Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a legal question regarding the recording of phone calls...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 02:42 PM
Original message
a legal question regarding the recording of phone calls...
If I call a company, and they start out with a message saying that this phone call "may be recorded...", if I want to record the call on my end, do I also have to advise the person who comes on the line at their end, or does that one recorded message on their part serve as proper notification to both parties that it might be being recorded...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd Think You'd Have to Tell Them...
...the employee consents to being recorded by his/her employer - they haven't given consent to being recorded by you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. The legal issue in terms of using it in court is whether a person KNOWS
they are being recorded, not who does the recording. So, if a company notifies you they are recording the same conversation, then no...there would be no duty on your part to tell them you are, likewise recording it although you have nothing to gain by concealing the point.


That is why if someone leaves a threat on your answering machine, it CAN BE admissible...they are OBVIOUSLY aware they are being recorded when leaving a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There is one reason to to gain by concealment:
Editorial rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Linda Tripp
Remembering Linda Tripp, I think this may be a State issue. Remember that she was supposed to be in soooo much trouble because the State she recorded Monica in has a law against it?

OTOH, when I call some company and they inform me that my call may be recorded for "quality control," I always say something like: I'm really sorry that you work for a company that is so unprofessional that they are compelled to intimidate their workers.... hehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It was in Maryland
Two things worked in Tripps favor.

The first was that the States Attorney in the specific jurisdiction was a Republican.

The States Attorney ruled that the Federal immunity granted to Tripp applied to state prosecution as well. Which confused the hell out of me since the Feds have no authority over the enforcement of state laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the reminder
Aren't we lucky to have Republican judges who are NOT "activists?"

Just like the SCOTUS deciding Florida voting laws!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Laws vary from state to state
In Oregon, one party to the conversation has to consent to its being recorded. So if you record your own conversation, it's okay. But other states require that both parties be notified that the conversation be recorded, and that's what got Linda Tripp in trouble, as I recall. In Maryland, where she initiated her call to her buddy Monica Lewinsky, both parties have to consent.

"Consent" can be a tricky proposition. If the message tells you the call "may" be recorded, do you consent to its being recorded if you continue with the call? What if the call is not discretionary, but mandatory (like a 9-1-1 call, or a call to your bank that your credit card has been stolen)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC