Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA .......we were sold out.........plain and simple.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:05 AM
Original message
NAFTA .......we were sold out.........plain and simple.
NAFTA verdict undeniable

http://pages.zdnet.com/sartre65/wrack/id38.html

snip....
The surrender of manufacturing employment as a sacrifice to the Free Traders, has forced this mass exodus of layed-off Americans - our own displaced persons. If you believe this is an intrinsic result, inevitable and unalterable; your confidence in political elites and their distortion of economic self-interest must mean you only buy Chinese. National suicide is not natural. But for the Free Trader mesmerized by visions of bountiful prosperity, produced under the illusion of backwater cheap labor, just what happens when the cash runs out because jobs left for overseas?

The big picture is confirmed by Pat Choate and cited by Mr Buchanan in his flagship magazine: “In the 1970s, mounted a decades-long deficit of $75 billion. . . . In the 1980s, the deficit soared to $843 billion as Japan began to take away our industries. . . . In the 1990s, that trade deficit doubled to $1.7 trillion. . . . At this pace, we’re probably going to have a $6 trillion cumulative deficit in this decade - and that’s probably an understated number given the pace we are losing our manufacturing base.”

NAFTA is the conveyance upon which the outflow hits home in the most visible way. The virtual bankruptcy of California has a fundamental linkage to the damage done by NAFTA. The best test of loyalty to real Americans is demonstrated by one’s attitude about the Free Trade rip-off. Politicians need to follow the wisdom of the economic miracle that built our country. SELF Interest in national economic independence and self sufficiency. If you want solutions, stop the outflow, rebuild U.S. industry and create domestic jobs.

snip

Where are the supporters now...? You know it sucks when you even have Pat Buchanan sounding off.

"Sure, NAFTA was really a wonderful deal for America. Two years after we negotiated and signed it, our trade surplus is gone, we've got a $15 billion trade deficit with Mexico, 300,000 jobs have gone south, the Florida winter tomato industry is on its back, illegal immigration is soaring into this country, Mexico is the prime source of narcotics and drugs, and my good friend Sen. Dole negotiated a $50 billion bailout with Bill Clinton for the regime that brought this all about. "

Pat Buchanan


And now we have CAFTA being cooked up...when will this crap stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paulsbc Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. so
Perot was correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. as
was Nader, but what do you mean by "so"? That makes it sound like a small thing. IT'S NOT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsbc Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. just wondering
I actually voted for Perot, and many ridiculed me for it. I bought what he said about NAFTA, and again was scorned. Turns out he, and I, were correct. You know, sort of feels good to be right once in a while, to bad I had hoped to be wrong given the people out of work because of it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yes, that "giant sucking sound" is real, Perot was right!
However, the CEO's who moved the jobs to the "cheap labor" locations have been paid plenty of money and they're very well-off, thank you very much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. this is corporatism 101...writing our laws to favor them....screwing us
I don't know how in the heck you can look at this any different.

It's not a single party...they "own" both parties when it comes to votes of treaties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. What really is mucked up about this ...........
is the fact that many of the countries with which we have a trade deficit.....their economies are dependent on the strength of the dollar. So............ we go down the tubes...so do they. No one wins at the end of this ponzi scheme. Granted, the EC will no doubt come to their rescue.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Serious questions...do employees of American corporations
who are Indian or Irish pay American taxes? Seriously...

If our jobs went overseas to people who earn about 1/4 or 1/3 of what we made, do they pay taxes on what they earn or what we would have earned?

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. as a US ex-pat working overseas...you pay taxes there/here
The people working on visa's in this country pay taxes...pay social security etc....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Is he talking about expats or citizens of other countries?
Edited on Wed Aug-13-03 12:27 AM by Democat
If they are American citizens, that's a different issue.

Most of the people working overseas are not Americans. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. They pay taxes according to the laws of their country
Do Nissan employees in the U.S. pay taxes to the Japanese government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Citizens of those countries pay no U.S. taxes if they're working
in that country, even if the company they work for is ultimately a U.S. company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's the same for U.S. citizens working for foreign companies in the U.S.
Imagine if all U.S. employees of non U.S. companies had to pay taxes to two governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. No doubt.
And Big Dog Clinton FOUGHT for NAFTA, unlike anything else of meaning he passed. Sell .... Out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. I am being facetious
We were the employees of the corporations.

We paid taxes.

Many of our jobs have gone overseas.

Those new employees in India, Ireland, Malta or wherever - are NOT paying taxes to the United States.

Or are they?

Doubtful.

Who pays for our country?

The bigger the corporation, the fewere taxes they pay? Wasn't one of Enron's tax breaks (refund?) larger than what they made in a comparable period?

I guess Lotto winners, the two bottom levels of wage earners, and the stars are paying for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. This question is not about ex-pats.
and it's not about what people in other countries pay to their own country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. jobs gone overseas = no taxes paid in US = higher burden on you/me
this is the problem....the corporations make out like bandits and the workers get screwed...unless your the new hire in India earning $12,000 for the $70,000 white collar US job you just took.

So ...no taxes collected for education...roads...etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. They pay taxes that go to education and roads in their country
It's just like when someone in America works for Nissan or Daimler Chrysler. Those Americans pay taxes to the American system, not to the country where the company is based.

Do you think that Americans should pay taxes to foreign governments when they work for a company that isn't American?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Just remembered!
I was tryng to get assistance with MSN, but since I have dial-up, I would try what each Tech offered and it took 10 techs located in a callcenter in INDIA before I finally, just by sheer accident I guess, got an American who gave me one simple thing which would have solved everything from the beginning and all was well.

Please don't think I have anything against Indians or any other workers of the world.

I'm just saying that a callcenter for MSN located out of the USA is absolutely ridiculous along with absolutely WRONG. But, what the heck, gives Gates a few extra bucks, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConservativeDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. You actually believe Pat Buchanan?
The man is a certified racist, economic idiot, and bush supporter.

He predicted NAFTA would send the U.S. down in flames by 1998. Instead, because we had Democrats in office, the economy did fine. Now we have Bush and suddenly it isn't huge tax breaks to the wealthy, laying to get us into wars, and piling on enormous deficits, that got us in trouble. No. It's NAFTA.

Look people. There are certainly real problems with completely unrestricted trade, but NAFTA isn't even that. I wouldn't go jumping in bed with a guy who opposed workers right to strike, who gloated about Ronald Reagan's firing of the Air Traffic Controllers, and has ties with anti-Mexican hate groups. Nearly every economist says his nostrums are bunk. Maybe you should believe them.

- C.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. No..I believe facts...and the facts are US jobs are leaving.
We can pull data all night to show the numbers...and they don't lie. NAFTA or no treaty...corporations are outsourcing jobs overseas and/or simply closing down manufacturing plants in search of cheaper labor.

What was made in Mexico is now threatened by rates in China. As long corporations make more $$$ they can give a crap about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-13-03 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. you said it, pal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC