Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would have happened if RFK lived?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:01 AM
Original message
What would have happened if RFK lived?
What would a timeline with RFK alive have been like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LastKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. more civil rights legislation faster? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it was more of a definitive crossroads for the U.S.
...than JFK's assassination.

The country grows in an entirely different direction after RFK wins the '68 election...

Especially coming right after the, um, "lone nuts" killed King, too... That kind of finished off the idea of America being able to heal itself in any meaningful way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Fewer heads cracked open
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 03:17 AM by gauguin57
at the '68 convention. RFK in office from 1969-76. The whole country would look different. We'd probably have gotten out of Vietnam earlier. Fewer names on the wall. Peace and prosperity.

No Watergate, so Woodward and Bernstein would be just another couple of reporters. Henry Kissinger would have been just a WANNABE war criminal instead of a real one. Who knows who might have run in 1976, on either side of the aisle.

And maybe Teddy would have had to watch his behavior more closely, being the brother of the president again. Mary Jo Kopechne might still be alive, and maybe so would Teddy's presidential hopes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. everything would have been different
RFK would have surely won the election, resulting in Nixon's leaving politics (losing to two different Kennedys in one decade is a bit much!); we would have left Vietnam much earlier. The Civil Rights Act would still have been passed. The Liberal and Progressive ideal would've been kept alive through the years. I would even wager that, barring any scandal under RFK, we wouldn't have even gotten Reagan ten years later.

The day RFK was shot was a day where everything really did change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. It reminds me of the old saying
that if one thing was different, everything would be different. To start with, the Chicago convention would not have occured in the violent manner it did -- it is hard to accurately determine how much damage that did to the party, and to America. One can only speculate who he would have selected as his VP, and the consequences of that choice in 1976, (assuming RFK was re-elected in '72). He would have negotiated a settlement in Vietnam by 1970.

RFK had a strained relationship with LBJ, yet there is no question that the great Society would have benefitted from the end of the war, and the change of investment of national resources. His personal relationship with MKL had some past strains, yet he shared the same dream and goals. RFK also had had his eyes opened by some of the traditional Native American leaders.

Our relationship with Central America would have been another important focus. If you take his growing awareness of Indian "issues" in our country, and look at Central America, you can see what direction he would have taken us there.

Many people say that the 11-22-63 killing of JFK was a coup. It really wasn't. The "system" merely got back on track, having rid itself of the problem that threatened it. JFK being elected had actually been the "coup." Malcolm going to the UN represented a similar threat; he was removed. No one in real power gave a shit if MKL sat next to a white man in a coffee shop or public toilet; when he threatened the economic system, he was removed. RFK was, in my opinion, the face that represented the combined threat of these three. If he hadn't been killed in CA, it would have happened the next week, or a few days later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC