Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since "under God" was added in '54 in reaction to godless communism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
homelandpunk Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:46 PM
Original message
Since "under God" was added in '54 in reaction to godless communism
which was the big enemy at that time, I propose we add further to the pledge in reaction to Jesus-less militant Islam, the big enemy at this time.
"One nation, under God, not Allah, indivisible"...etc.
Or if that is considered too broad, we can clarify:
"One nation, under God, not Wahabiist Islam's Allah, indivisible..."

If the pledge needed to be updated to make a religous point during the Red Scare, now it is even more important to make sure the God part is interpreted correctly as a Judaeo-Christian God and not the God of enemies of the US.

Don't you agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, can't agree with it.
There is only one God, not one for Muslims, one for Jews and one for Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
homelandpunk Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wow, and I thought I wrote with obvious tongue in cheek.
Oh well.
Never claimed to be a skilled writer. Still, I have to kick myself for not nailing it like I thought I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Or none, or many.
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."

--Stephen Roberts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I get your sarcasm.
There were a lot of people who didn't like the "under god" addition to the pledge even back then in the fifties, but they didn't really speak up as a unified block of citizens, so now this has bubbled up fifty years later. I think cherrypicking issues like this only wins battles not the war. We need to go after the whole issue of separation of Church and State and make it stick this time. Religious people have to understand this protects their rights too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. "One nation, under Christ
with individual redemption for the saved"


If you are going to express the sectarian push behind this "under god" nonsense, you may as well go all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Pledge should go back to the way it was originally written in the 20's
By a Socialist nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. None of this addresses the idiocy of the Pledge in the first place.
Think about it. Pledging allegiance to a. . . flag?!? What's that about. The flag is a symbol, a piece of cloth. A powerful symbol, but not itself what this country is about. I'll pledge allegiance to our Constitution, but not the flag.

Which is really getting me odd looks these days, especially when I'll stand quietly, but not pledge at some kind of political gathering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I missed the sarcasm..sorry
but I've seen similar posts that weren't sarcasm, such as someone's God being better than another persons.
I remember the pledge without the "under God" and was surprised when I heard it in there for the first time. Thought maybe I remembered it wrong or something.
I'm not a flag-waver and when I see a whole bunch of flag waving like after 9/11, all I could think was..oh oh, there's some more bad stuff coming down the pike..and there was.
Two things make me nervous. Flag waving and God spouting rhetoric. Neither one is conducive to a peaceful situation for very long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC