PNAC wanted a "9/11" - Cheney/Rumsfeld put plan into action

Enough is enough.

The administration had AMPLE chance to warn the nation that some kind of attack was imminent after August 2001 and they LET IT HAPPEN.

Their shock, in my opinion, was that the attack was as massive as it was. I personally believe that Rice, Rumsfeld and Cheney secretly figured the attack would be more like a "traditional hijacking" resulting in death that would anger the nation in order to begin the PNAC Middle East "reformation" and oil grab.

Wesley Clark has made it clear that the administration and their neocon allies started making the case to invade Iraq shortly after 9/11 and their actions since then have mirrored PNAC plans.

WHEN will the protests begin? One man or woman with a sign does little.

A MILLION people surrounding the White House would send a different message to the PNAC cabal and the criminals in office.

WHEN IS ENOUGH ENOUGH??

IT IS NEVER ENOUGH! I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK DAMN IT!

As THE authors of US policy over the last 2 years.

WHY?

might be since he worked on the board of the company that provided security to the world trade center AND security for United up until 'the day the towers fell down'. And it's funny Bush apparently never disclosed this bit of information.

note knowing the terrorists would fly planes into those towers? I can't help thinking that it sounds an awful lot like April Glaspie saying that they didn't know Hussein would take all of Kuwait.

June 28, 2001
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice receives a CIA intelligence summary warning a significant al Qaeda attack in the near future is "highly likely."

May 2002

Rice: "I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center ... All of this reporting about hijacking was about traditional hijacking."

July 2002
Rice: "Now on August 6, the President received a Presidential daily briefing, which was not a warning briefing but an analytic report. This analytic report, which didn't have warning information in it of the kind that said, they are talking about an attack against so forth or so on, it was an analytic report that talked about UBL's methods of operation, talked about what he had done historically in 1997, in 1998.

It mentioned hijacking, but hijacking in the traditional sense, and in a sense said that the most important and most likely thing was that they would take over an airliner holding passengers and demand the release of one of their operatives."

LIAR LIAR!

July '01 anti-aircraft missiles were deployed in Genova Italy

to protect W* from a threat to crash planes into the buildings

where they were meeting

according to CNN.

* Who requested the plan?
* Timing, anyone?

A big list of 9/11 warnings:

http://www.newwartimes.com/warnings.html