Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sadly, I have come to the VP conclusion that you might not want

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nimble_Idea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:06 PM
Original message
Sadly, I have come to the VP conclusion that you might not want
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 09:06 PM by Nimble_Idea
As I am still holding out hope that it will be Wes Clark....
It seems that the VP will indeed be Gep.

Some people still have dark-room-activity fantasies about
Edwards or McCain....but it won't happen.

I had been holding out hope and still do , that Kerry will come to his
senses and not be manipulated by the media's attempts to destroy his campaign.

Gep is the safe choice.....but I hope Kerry has the guts to give Clark the Nod.

I would say that I wouldn't vote for Kerry if he didn't choose Clark, or if he Chose McCain or Edwards....but I would just be saying it to get a few people riled up just for spite.

Truth is, whoever he picks, I will still cast the Vote for Kerry.
It's not like Kerry needs a puppet master whispering into his ear what he should say to the media. Nor does Kerry need someone to "help" him be president.....Maybe Kerry will just pick someone who is a friend he can trust to be the Prez in his stead......The pick , no matter who it is, will defintely say alot about Kerry.....but Probably not what the Media is going to sell the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Enjoy your sadness....
......none of us knows...no use fretting about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Right.
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 09:32 PM by Kahuna
Fretting about it is absolutely useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Kerry picks Gep....
then the only reason I'll even show up (and yes, hold my nose for the presidential vote) is the fact that I want to cast a vote for Barack Obama for Senator.

If Obama was not a Senatorial candidate on my ballot with a Kerry/Gephardt presidential ticket, I would not show up at the polls for the first election since my eighteenth birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bah yeah you would.
You were once the leader of the Nobody But Dean movement. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah I was
in direct response to the Anybody But Dean movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And if he chooses Gep...
...well, we already know, but take heart Kerry, you could mow down on a live seal and I'd likely STILL vote for you over Bush. But seriously, should that be a point of pride?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'd have no choice but to reconsider Nader
Not sayin' I'd vote for Nader, but if Gep is the choice, I'll be rethinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Nader recommended Kerry pick Gep a few weeks ago - do a google
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think Kerry is going to go the safe route....
he will choose Gep...

I have no problem with this...Gep needs to get his Daughters involved with Kerry's on the campaign trail. The man has a wonderful supportive family.

Problems I do have are that the guy like Kerry voted For the Iraq War....but his experience in congress and knowledge of foreign policy and domestic labor issues make him an asset.

In the rust belt areas like Penn. Mich. Ohio....and in the heartland of Miss., Ark. and Iowa...Gep just may be the one to swing it our way.

Kerry can still hint at or out-right announce during the convention key positions in his cabinet from candidates that he has vetted during the VP selection process. This would at least shake things up a little with what could be perceived as a boring Washington Insider Democratic Ticket.

If Kerry is comfortable with Gephardt then, guess what so am I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Putting the Rose Garden War Whore on the ballot
will alienate the anti-war vote who are currently ABB.

I guarantee it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Because they're not alienated already
or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Note the ABB qualifier
They are alienated currently, but are ABB.

The Rose Garden War Whore will drive a lot of them over the edge.

Putting Gephardt on the ticket could well be the kiss of death for the Kerry campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. If my calculations are correct, Walt
you have predicted approximately 37,213,998,104 moments where this or that might be the 'kiss of death' for the Kerry campaign.

Sorry, dude, but I'm sticking with the candidate's instincts. Excuse me, the nominee's instincts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I think your calculations are off
seeing as how I don't have that many posts.

We'll see, as I said, If he chooses Gep, I'm reconsidering Nader. I can't speak for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. When did you stop considering Nader?
I seem to recall a bunch of sig line trumpeting from you. 'Never again' and all that. Did you change your mind again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. When I started donating to Kerry
But that could come to a stop for me if I see Gep as the Veep.

Not saying definitely, but I'll be even more pissed by that choice than I was baout Gore's choice of Lieberman in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. OK
I'm behind the times these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I guess so
you must have missed the thread where I donated an extra $100 because somebody told the DNC to "shove off".

I think about another $1000 went to Kerry in that thread.

Gep is just so, boring, and Kerry's campaign is already boring enough, IMO. He needs a dynamic Veep to do anything.

Kerry/Gephardt V Bush/Cheney makes me want to go to sleep and go into a permanent "who gives a shit" mode over presidential politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Note the ABB qualifier
They are alienated currently, but are ABB.

The Rose Garden War Whore will drive a lot of them over the edge.

Putting Gephardt on the ticket could well be the kiss of death for the Kerry campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Better statement, "Because they're not alienated ENOUGH already"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. So both of them will continue to support the war in Iraq??
Gephardt was even more pro-war than just about any Democrat? Is that a problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yep, that and the fact he was pushing Lieberman out of the way
in the Rose Garden to get his whore shot with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. So was Edwards....
Gephardt at least has more experience....

I know....but when your given clay I guess you somehow make bricks...

I'm not jumping for joy right now either....believe me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I was really worried you were
going to say Lieberman.
:puke:

gephardt is marginally better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It's going to be Edwards, not Gep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. My guess is that Edwards is going to be cutting his teeth a few
more years as Attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Attorney General position is the kiss of death for a political career
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 09:36 PM by Walt Starr
Look at this, it's an entire list of those who have served as Attorney General:

ATTORNEYS GENERAL

Edmund Randolph 1789-1794 Washington
William Bradford 1794-1795 Washington
Charles Lee 1795-1801 Washington & John Adams
Levi Lincoln 1801-1805 Jefferson
John Breckenridge 1805-1806 Jefferson
Caesar A. Rodney 1807-1811 Jefferson & Madison
William Pinkney 1811-1814 Madison
Richard Rush 1814-1817 Madison
William Wirt 1817-1829 Monroe & John Q. Adams
John M. Berrien 1829-1831 Jackson
Roger B. Taney 1831-1833 Jackson
Benjamin F. Butler 1833-1838 Jackson & Van Buren
Felix Grundy 1838-1839 Van Buren
Henry D. Gilpin 1840-1841 Van Buren
John J. Crittenden 1841-1841 Harrison & Tyler
Hugh S. Legare 1841-1843 Tyler
John Nelson 1843-1845 Tyler
John Y. Mason 1845-1846 Polk
Nathan Clifford 1846-1848 Polk
Issac Toucey 1848-1849 Polk
Reverdy Johnson 1849-1850 Taylor
John J. Crittenden 1850-1853 Fillmore
Caleb Cushing 1853-1857 Pierce
Jeremiah S. Black 1857-1860 Buchanan
Edwin M. Stanton 1860-1861 Buchanan
Edward Bates 1861-1864 Lincoln
James Speed 1864-1866 Lincoln & Johnson
Henry Stanberry 1866-1868 Johnson
William M. Evarts 1868-1869 Johnson
Ebenzer R. Hoar 1869-1870 Grant
Amos T. Akerman 1870-1872 Grant
George H. Williams 1871-1875 Grant
Edwards Pierrepont 1875-1876 Grant
Alphonso Taft 1876-1877 Grant
Charles Devens 1877-1881 Hayes
Wayne MacVeagh 1881-1881 Garfield
Benjamin H. Brewster 1881-1885 Arthur
Augustus H. Garland 1885-1889 Cleveland
William H.H. Miller 1889-1893 Harrison
Richard Olney 1893-1895 Cleveland
Judson Harmon 1895-1897 Cleveland
Joseph McKenna 1897-1898 McKinley
John W. Griggs 1898-1901 McKinley
Philander C. Knox 1901-1904 McKinley
William H. Moody 1904-1906 Roosevelt
Charles J. Bonaparte 1906-1909 Roosevelt
George W. Wickersham 1909-1913 Taft
James C. McReynolds 1913-1914 Wilson
Thomas Watt Gregory 1914-1919 Wilson
A. Mitchell Palmer 1919-1921 Wilson
Harry M. Daugherty 1921-1924 Harding
Harlan Fiske Stone 1924-1925 Coolidge
John T. Sargent 1925-1929 Coolidge
William D. Mitchell 1929-1933 Hoover
Homer S. Cummings 1933-1939 Roosevelt
Frank Murphy 1939-1940 Roosevelt
Robert H. Jackson 1940-1941 Roosevelt
Francis Biddle 1941-1945 Roosevelt
Tom C. Clark 1945-1949 Truman
J. Howard McGrath 1949-1952 Truman
James P. McGranery 1952-1953 Truman
Herbert Brownell,Jr. 1953-1957 Eisenhower
William P. Rogers 1957-1961 Eisenhower
Robert F. Kennedy 1961-1964 Kennedy
Nicholas deB. Katzenbach 1965-1966 Johnson
Ramsey Clark 1967-1969 Johnson
John N. Mitchell 1969-1972 Nixon
Richard G. Kleindienst 1972-1973 Nixon
Elliot L. Richardson 1973-1973 Nixon
William B. Saxbe 1974-1975 Nixon
Edward H. Levi 1975-1977 Ford
Griffin B. Bell 1977-1979 Carter
Benjamin R. Civiletti 1979-1981 Carter
William French Smith 1981-1985 Reagan
Edwin Meese III 1985-1988 Reagan
Richard Thornburgh 1988-1991 Reagan & George Bush
William Barr 1991-1993 George Bush
Janet Reno 1993-2001 Clinton
John Ashcroft 2001- George W. Bush


Hmmmmmm, looks like a list of obscure politicians to me. Politicians who never made it any higher than Attorney General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taylor Mason Powell Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Harlan Fiske Stone
later became Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Not too shabby, if you ask me.

But that is interesting, how few if any of them ever went on to elected office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. And Robert Jackson was the Nuremberg prosecutor
and a SC Justice--which isn't too shabby. Bobby Kennedy would have been president.

But, a lot of real shitheads too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. it could be a lot worse
I don't understand, yes I understand the war vote but I know a lot of people here dont like free trade deals and stuff, Gephardt I think could get us on the right track with "fair trade" programs. He's not my pick, I want Edwards honestly but I like him,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigmansentme Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. what mccain?
look, i don't know anybody else, but from day one when this 'mccain for vp' rumor started i knew it was bullshit, that's clear to anybody who knows anything about politics or character of men involved, and after all this time you still 'hope' that kerry chooses mccain? just because of that idiocy you whole post loses its credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. Man I hope you're wrong!
That would be the world's most BORING ticket! Let's not forget about the IWR party in the Rose Garden with Gep standing right beside the chimp. Kerry doesn't do ANYTHING for me and if Gep is on the ticket....:boring: G-d I hope you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC