Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Clark win Arkansas?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:31 PM
Original message
Could Clark win Arkansas?
If General Wesley Clark were nominated to be the Democratic presidential candidate, does anyone believe he could beat Bush without Florida? He would have to win all the Gore states + his home state of Arkansas, correct? Furthermore, I believe Clark could put Florida into play regardless. I believe the senior citizens who live in the southern portion of the state would really go for him. A Clark-Dean ticket could shore up the Gore states + Arkansas IMO, which = victory. But a Clark-Graham ticket could leave some areas of the NE vulnerable, while putting Florida into play. It is a double-edged sword. Which do you see as the best strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I could be wrong here...
but don't we need the Gore states +2? Because of the 2000 census, "blue states" lost a total of 7 electoral votes and obviously the "red states" gained 7. So, I think we need more than 1 state, of course, this also all depends on the state we add...

Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clark-Dean = Gore states + Arkansas & NH?
Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sounds doable to me...
I'd much prefer Clark/Graham however...

Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 270 EV...
it's a little too close for comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree, you never know how
states like NM or PA will go. It's too risky to totally count on Gore's states. btw, did Gore win Maine? If not, I would think Dean could definitely put that into play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Gore won...
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 02:56 PM by mcd1982
Wash.
Ore.
Ca.
NM.
Minn.
Iowa
Wisc.
Ill.
Mich.
D.C.
Penn.
Del.
NJ
NY
Ver.
Mass.
R.I.
Maine
Conn.

Oops...and Hawaii!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. nevermind
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 02:45 PM by Proletariat
Im blind :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Gore won Connecticut...
although it went from 8 to 7 EV due to reapportionment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I made a mistake...
Gore got Conn. and Hawaii but not NH.

Sorry!

Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. It's important to remember that Maine splits its EV by cong. dists.
After redistricting...
Maine At Large (2 EV): Gore, 49%-44%
Maine CD 1 (1 EV): Gore, 51%-43%
Maine CD 2 (1 EV): Gore, 47%-46%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here's the 2004 Gore totals...
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 02:57 PM by mcd1982
Corrected...

Wash. - 11
Ore. - 7
Ca. - 55
N.M. - 5
Minn. - 10
Iowa - 7
Wisc. - 10
Ill. - 21
Mich. - 17
D.C. - 3
Maryland - 10
Del. - 3
N.J. - 15
Penn. - 21
Conn. - 7
RI - 4
NY - 31
Mass. - 12
Vermont - 3
Maine - 4
Hawaii - 4

Total of Gore states in 2004: 260


Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yes...you forgot Vermont
VT-3...for a total of 260 EV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. For some reason....
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 03:08 PM by mcd1982
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Bush 2004 total...
is 279.

Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. Didn't Maine have a 6% Green vote in 2000?
Gore and Bush were practically in a dead heat. I have no idea how Maine will go in 2004 hopefully all those Green votes will go for the as yet unnamed democratic canidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gore + Arkansas only gives 266 EV
I think Clark would make a strong candidate because he would have a really good shot at carrying AR (6), FL (27), and TN (11).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clark and Graham and Dean
What a list of candidates! We need a Southerner for sure. When Clinton and Gore ran, we had two Southerners. I'm for whoever can beat Shrub. Everyone of the dems is so superior to Bush, but not all of them can beat him. I will vote for anyone or anything against that no-brain loser, but we need someone who will tell it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HerbieHeadhunter Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Easily, speaking as an Arkansan....
He has a lot of respect state wide and Arkansas as whole is still a Democratic state...and he has the luck already being criticized by the AR Democrat-Gazette editorial page, quite possibly the worst and the most conservative editorial page in the country. Clinton lived nine political lives based on having wack-job enemies on that editorial page. If I'm running for office, I know that I want that editorial page against me.

Clark would easily take the east, south and central (Little Rock) area of the state. The northwest section of the state is heavily Republican, but has been put into play by Democrats recently by Sen. Pryor who damn near beat Tim Hutchinson in the 3rd Congressional District
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariat Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sounds promising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clark Could Help in Arkansas, Yes
If he's the nominee, VP nominee, or future senior cabinet official, I hope he worships Arkansas and stumps for the Democratic ticket. Arkansas is definitely winnable in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Wesley grew up here ...
and still lives here.

In Arkansas, that goes a loooooong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. I bet he takes Florida
This is anecdotal, but the older relatives have been complaining about the direction of the Medicare system under Bush since last year. I also suspect that Clark might neutralize some of the Republican military communities in the state. If he were the nominee and I were his campaign manager I would visit that state often and have a meticulously organized get-out-the-vote and vote monitoring brigade.

I have a gut feeling that other red states might be winnable for him, mainly West Virginia and Ohio. Is any of the Souros funding going into either of these states?

I hope he enters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Clark could win in Florida
If they count all the votes this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think Clark gets Gore states plus a few more
All of the cliffhangers and "should be Dem" states would go to Clark. I really think he is that strong. He transcends his state of origin by being a national figure. I'm personally hoping for a Clark/Edwards ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Sounds pretty good.
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 03:26 PM by tjdee
I am a pretty strong Edwards supporter right now, but if Clark lives up to his hype I am extremely comfortable with either combination of the two. I very much like the direction of Edwards' campaign and I wonder where Clark will fall in.

*shallow alert*
And they'd be the best looking ticket in history. Creepy, small eyed Bush and Cheney would look very bad in comparison--before the talking even started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. The best looking ticket in history
will be Clark/Granholm, '08, after the Hatch constitutional amendment goes through and Vice President Lautenberg announces his retirement.

Hey, we need something for both the guys and the girls, right?

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. She is gorgeous, got that right.
I'd be up for a lady on the ticket too. Equal opportunity drooling and all that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Hee
"Equal opportunity drooling." I'm all for that!

(along with equal opportunity in general, of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Central Red States
bushco has been very poor on agricultural policy. Add to that a personal friendship that Clark has with Lugar and iirc Hegel. While they may not campaign for him, considering that both of these guys have been openly critical of bush, they will be very hard pressed to campaign against him.

Florida is very doable for Clark. The military vote extends beyond the immediate families, and will at least split 50-50 or lean Clark. Clark is known in the ranks as one of the brass who made it a point to address the rank and file issues. Plus, he remembers the names of anyone who has ever served with him.

I was just in West Va and hanging with some repubs., who are very unhappy about mountain top removal. Clark was an easy sell; these are professionals_lawyers and doctors_who are ready to jump the kingboys ship. They just need they right candidate. The most reluctant was a liberal Dem who was hesitant because of the military connection. I assured him that I am still the flaming liberal I've always been, and I am ready to rock the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Hey DZ,
where ya been? I guess you saw that letters are flooding the draft sites after the Wolf show? If not, check the link in the other Clark thread. Extremely impressive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Where have I been?
I went camping...or one might think of it as: voluntarily living without power.

Great about the letters. I'm really worried about begging Clark to enter this fray. The first thing Rove will do will be to belittle Clark's accomplishments. Next they will try to degrade his record. No one who has taken four bullets while serving his country should have to put up with the chickenshits' lies. Clark sense of honor might prove his weakness. Does he know how criminal his opposition will be? Slobby doesn't hold a candle to our current regime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. Clark would be competetive in the Border South...WVA, KY, MO..
...perhaps in Arkansas. I think Clark would be very competetive in West Virginia and Kentucky. He might even be competive in Ohio as he is sort of a
John Glenn type of figure...moderate career military guy who is also a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Arkansas, Bigguy, is far more than a 'perhaps'
My God .. Wesley is from here, grew up here, graduated from little rock hall high and got his west point nomination from an arkansas congressman. And, of course, he lives here now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. "favorite son candidacy".....and look at the Cliton vote...
....I can see Clark reassembling the Clinton electoral votes ...picking up the states Clinton won. Its do-able.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Ohio
I was also traveling in Ohio. Of all the states I spent time in, nothing felt more red than Ohio. Gore didn't carry the state, and I'm not sure the chances are good for anyone in 2004. It was always strange...a labor state that voted repub. Go figure.

No, PA felt red too. Although I spent most of my time in the northern and rural part of state. Gore did carry PA, so that one worries me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. this is why I want clark on the ticket.
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 04:19 PM by tedoll78
It's become pretty obvious that Graham won't deliver Florida, as his poll #'s have plummeted.

So my preference for a Dean VP became Clark.
They'd deliver Gore's + New Hampshire + Arkansas = 270EVs exactly.

I also wouldn't mind a Clark-Dean ticket.

edit: also keep in mind that Clark can campaign with Clinton on Arkansas.. something Al Gore was more wary of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. If I were Clark
And if I won the nomination, I would target Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee and Florida. I would test the waters in Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia, and let Bush have the rest of the South ('Bama, Miss., SC and Texas).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC