Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what is the difference between neo-liberalism and paleo-conservatism?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:09 PM
Original message
what is the difference between neo-liberalism and paleo-conservatism?
I am serious, before the rise of this current type of evil neo-conservative I would seldom been in agreement with the likes of Pat Buchannan on some issues.

What does it mean when something that looked bad before now doesn't look that different from your own views?


Agreement

Iraq/unjust wars = bad
balanced budgets = good
social issues = libertarian-conservatives agree with liberals/greens


Disagreement

immigration
domestic spending priorties
tax structure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. neoliberalism is more free market and global.
while also being somewhat liberal on social issues or issues of personal conduct. I would say someone like George Soros is a neoliberal.

Paleoconservatives, tho free marketeers, are also nationalists/isolationist and conservative/traditionalist on social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Many Kucinich supporters here
call for the outright destruction of NAFTA and an isolationist policy geared to maintaining high-paying jobs in the US.

Is this any different from conservative isolationism, or is that only in matters of foreign policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Its just an economic reason.
The conservatives are isolationist/nationalist on principle, while the Kucinich folks oppose this more because of the effects on US workers....more for economic/populist reasons.

For example I bet the Kucinich folks would not be opposed to a free trade agreement w., say, Canada, if benefits and wages where equalized between US and Canadian workers. Paleocons would be opposed to this on principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaverickX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I oppose NAFTA too but I still...
Think we need to trade with other nations. Just not the so-called free trade we have now. Globalization as we know it is too anarchist and unlike conservative opponents of globalization I want some kind of global governing body to regulate it. That's far from isolation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudeboy666 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. paleos
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 04:26 PM by rudeboy666
"Paleoconservatives, tho free marketeers..."___yes and no.

The reason that I also put a 'no' is because a lot of paleo-conservatives are very critical of the free market. They are very likely to support protectionism and strongly oppose global free trade. Moreover, they fear the forces of an unchecked free market i.e. cheap consumerism, porn, etc,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Generally the true conservatives
are essentially isolationist, while the progressives are internationalist and multilateral.
Both want balanced budgets.
Both oppose free trade and multinationals.
Both oppose military adventurism.
Generally the Conservatives want less spending and less taxes across the board---Progressives want more progressive taxes, more wealth distribution and more social spending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think you mean traditional liberalism and paleoconservatives
neoliberals favor nafta.

The difference is in the reasoning. The Paleocons do it to protect native industries, and the traditional liberals do it to protect union labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC