Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good Morning America really smacking First Energy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DEMActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:04 AM
Original message
Good Morning America really smacking First Energy
Every 30 minutes - lead story.

Brian Ross reporting that the blackout started at First Energy in Cincinnati and they donated $400,000.00 to republicans only last year.

That's basically the entire story being repeated every half hour!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent!
Especially with Bush having already come out trying to use this as an excuse to give his shit energy bill passed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, thats a start
Why not mention the lawsuit that hurt First Energy and favored New York, New Jersey and Michigan? (no link, Will Pitt had it posted the other day)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DEMActivist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Better than a start
The first half hour, they had a clip of Dennis Kucinich discussing exactly that in another piece. I haven't seen that repeat yet.

They also had Richardson on repeating that it was the engery companies' fault for not investing in transmission.

Give them credit - they are covering it and none of the republicans look good here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. FE must be doing a "WTF?" right about now
Anyone of these Utilities could have
taken the same Hit.

They all qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know what I saw on c-span before I shut if off? Some repuglican
energy honcho in the bush cabinet that said bush proposed a mandate two years ago to have new energy guidelines put into place. Right away I knew he was lying because I read on DU that they wouldn't pass something like that two years ago. Trying to rewrite history again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You should tune back in...
...this guy is getting smacked HARD...

Actually, it's been pretty nice. Lots of anti-Bush callers. Smackdown again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. "Not about Good Guys and Bad Guys"-McSlarrow
When these guys start saying the above
and talking "Bipartisan Efforts"
you know their "buts are in a sling"

This is when the moles like
Daschle, Biden, and Lieberman, Gephardt,
have to be brought in for
damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kbowe Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is it time for "profit controls?"
The neocon-ultra-RW- are opposed to any kind of regulation--hence the massive deregulation of all things in the public interest (energy, air lines, water, etc.) Since there seems to be no place for the government to regulate the distribution of these utilities, is it time for emergency "PROFIT" controls? We can't get "PRICE" controls because of that would be "unAmerican" according to the anti-government RW. Well, what about emergency profit controls that allow all public utilities to make at the maximum of 90% profit instead of the 600% return it is said that the oil and other energy industries made over the past 3 years.
What about limits on CEO pay and limits on the amount of costs that get passed on to the consumer. If we are truly a capitalistic society then the risk of doing business and the cost of doing business should be the responsibility of the folks in the business otherwise all business enterprise is merely a guaranteed profit and success no matter how badly the business is run. Our big corporations already get huge tax breaks and what is not given to them in tax breaks they achieve by taking their business out of the country for cheap labor, they can raise prices to cover any increases and safety requirements imposed by the meager laws on the books...in short, US big business are simply RISK FREE! Does this sound like capitalism to you? Have we really been using a socialistic system for big business while decrying anything that smacks of social programs for PEOPLE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Welcome
Interesting analysis.
But I think I have been up too long with too odd of hours to reply eloquently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hi Kbowe!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. ok, here's where you go wrong
If we are truly a capitalistic society then the risk of doing business and the cost of doing business should be the responsibility of the folks in the business.....

That's the thing, we are actually under a fascist regime. It is way beyond capitalism. We won't feed hungry kids but we'll fill the coffers of R donors with tax-payer funds.....

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Tony Alexander is a Bu$h pioneer
Alexander is the CEO of First Energy and was also on Cheney's Energy Task Force.

He also runs a nuke plant in Ohio that has very serious problems with its containment unit and came close to melting down last year.

If these slimballs didn't spend so much time and money on supporting Bu$h and enriching themselves, maybe they would have had enough money to keep these utilities in good condition. That's the least the public should expect in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I believe you but
how do we know he was on the task force, I thought the list was secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Alexander was on the Bush Energy Transition Team
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 09:00 AM by Snellius
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. FirstEnergy

FirstEnergy was a contributor to Energy secretary Spencer Abraham's failed campaign in the tune of $2000. Not much, but it's worth exploring the relationship between FirstEnergy and Abraham.

$825,000 from electric utilities to the Bush campaign by their own accounting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC