Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Monsonto bullying tiny family dairy farm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:45 PM
Original message
Monsonto bullying tiny family dairy farm
http://www.workingforchange.com/activism/action.cfm?ItemId=15454&afccode=WFC004&CFID=9060746&CFTOKEN=52419532

Monsanto, Stop Bullying Tiny Dairy Over Growth Hormones

Contributed by Working Assets

In a move of Goliath attacking David, Monsanto, the multi-national agrichemical company, is suing a small, family-owned milk producer in Maine because they advertise that their farmers pledge not to use artificial growth hormones (also known as rBST) on the cows that produce their milk.

Oakhurst Dairy pays its suppliers a price premium not to use artificial growth hormones on their cows and they advertise this via a Farmer's Pledge emblem on their products. They do so in order to respond to consumer demand for dairy products produced by cows free of rBST. The dairy makes no health claim about the Farmer's Pledge, but Monsanto claims that even a factual assertion misleads consumers!

Although approved for use in the United States by the FDA, artificial growth hormone is already banned in the European Union and Canada, and Monsanto clearly fears that even informing consumers of its use will damage its sales. Monsanto's lawsuit demands that Oakhurst only be able to keep the Farmer's Pledge label if it adds information about FDA approval. Not surprisingly, Monsanto is not asking that the label include information about the European Union and Canadian bans.

Lawsuits such as this are shameless attempts to use the financial clout of a multi-billion monopolist to intimidate a tiny family-owned business. Consumers clearly want the information being provided to them, and Monsanto should get out of the way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. i've heard lots of horror stories of Monsanto
and their bullying of small companies and small nations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacefreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep
that's why I go out of my way to buy Oakhurst products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. If I were the Farmer I'd comply...
...just to avoid the cost of a lawsuit, then I'd also add the info on EU and Canadian bans. Then again I'm an asshole. REEEEEEEEaly hate getting pushed around, and since they won't let me shoot people for pissing me off.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. lol
now i read yours =)

i like how us evil DU'ers think alike ;->

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. they should submit
and include the info about it's banning in europe etc :evilgrin:

bet it would not only save them money but more IMPORTANTLY BOOST SALES :bounce:

then stick to their guns on the next law suit ;-)

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should replace their wording.
Replace it with articles on what a shitty company Monsanto is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another Monsanto litigation
There was a farmer in... Montana?... who planted corn from seed stock that wasn't Monsanto's and didn't have the genetic material from legumes that causes problems for people with peanut allergies. But when he harvested his crop and brought it to market, tests showed that the gene had gotten in there, presumably by natural cross-pollination by insects. So he couldn't sell his crop as untainted.

Monsanto's response was to sue the farmer for copyright infringement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC