Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should 18 year old women have to register for the draft too?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:31 PM
Original message
Should 18 year old women have to register for the draft too?
We have had a long fight for equal pay, voting rights and against exclusive clubs and glass ceilings.

Is it time to demand equality in the draft?

Do you think it would be fair to draft only men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Which question are you answering?
Women should have to register for the draft. After all, they are in the military now. Whether or not they should be put in combat is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Sorry, I wasn't clear
I meant no, women should not be drafted. But your question was should they have to register for the draft. My mistake.

In fairness, I guess I don't see any reason why women couldn't be required to register. I wouldn't agree to put them in combat. But I don't know that it would be necessary to draft women for support services - I think their are enough who volunteer to fill those positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Your reason being???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrdinaryTa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Male-Only Draft Has Never Been Fair
The male-only draft has never been fair. But don't hold your breath waiting for anybody to do anything about it. There will never be conscription of females. It won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes
Where there are equal rights of citizenship there must be equal responsibilities.

But the religious right will never allow their president to support it. They still idealize this fantasy world from the 1940's where "our boys" go off to war and the ladies stay home and kiss them goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure what the hell ...
In all fairness, they should.
In all reality, no they should not.

I have three daughters, one of which would have to register should (god forbid) AWOL get his "Four More Wars".

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Even if you object to women in combat,
shouldn't they be liable for the draft too, even if they serve in other capacities? Nurses have always been a necessary part of the military especially in combat and many have lost their lives doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I enlisted when I was 17 and served four years
but until women are represented equally in CONGRESS I don't think they should be drafted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
48. That doesn't matter
Women have ALL the rights of citizenship, they should have all the responsibilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. you need to wake up son
women do not have all the rights of citizenship. Even so I do believe women should be subject to the draft so don't bother trying to pick an imaginary fight with feminists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Doesn't mean they are treated equally
They have all the rights. Blacks, we have the all the rights too, but the same applies and black males are all forced to sign up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
71. Excellent point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. I should add that I have three sons and I know I don't want to lose them
any more than someone with daughters. I believe that it would be a moot point if someone won a case for equal draft rights for women. I don't believe they would bring the draft back period.

I don't understand why the ACLU hasn't fought a case against the fact that only males are required to register at 18. I think that is fundamentally wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Women should be drafted but not assigned to combat units. Women performed
heroically in every military engagement. In WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, they were viewed by out enemies as quasi or true noncombatants like medical corps personnel. Assignment to combat units however, blurs their military role and if captured, encourages abuse and degradation. I’m not ready for that and I believe most Americans share my view.

As regards the draft, a more important question is why don’t we draft corporations? SCOTUS is systematically giving corporations the same freedoms and rights as humans, so draft the corporations for the duration of the War on Terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aaron Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Interesting idea
If Corporations want to be people, then perhaps they should be allowed the resnponsibilities as well as the benefits - I think I like it :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Drafted? Yes. Combat? No
Would you want a bunch of women running around with M-4s and grenades?? Just kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I Think Women Toting Guns Are Very Sexy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. So do I. But there are not many of them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. no
no one should register. Selective Service should be abolished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Assuming we must have a standing military, why should the poor die for
the rich?

If all men and women are equal, shouldn't dying be spread uniformly across all social levels?

I know AWOL and his chicken-hawk cronies will answer NO, because they've already voted, but what about you? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. Follow Major General Butler's rule: draft the ruling class first
Put them in infantry units, and watch how quickly the reasons for war go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colin Ex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. You beat me to it.
Nobody should HAVE to register. Regardless of gender.


-C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. How would you reply to my #13 above? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. fights not over
E.R.A. not ratified.

http://www.now.org/issues/economic/cea/who.html
Who Needs An Equal Rights Amendment? You Do!

After more than 200 years of living under the United States Constitution and despite all of the progress we have made, women continue to suffer discrimination in employment, insurance, health care, education, the criminal justice system, social security and pensions, and just about any other area you can name. </snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
79. i don't understand that...
there are more women than men, yet there isn't a equal rights amendment. what is wrong with this picture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, women should be drafted.
Yes it IS time to demand equality in the draft IF it is going to be instituted again, though I don't believe it ever should be brought back.

As a military spouse, I have no doubt about my ability to watch another's back, to fight as much for my unit-mates as for myself. I've told my husband that I'd feel a lot safer if I was beside him in a foxhole rather than some jerk who could just as well wish him dead as anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samurai_jack Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes
It's an issue of fundamental fairness. The selective service law as currently written is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. What draft?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes
For the current selective service

Yes, in the very unlikely bizzaro world of a revived draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. No. Nobody should have to be drafted.
But, if there is a blatant draft, women should be drafted as well. I just hate the idea that the terror of the draft should be forced upon anyone.

However, I say that the real draft is economic and that already includes women. People that are forced into military service due to poor opportunities and lack of Poppy Bushes are already facing a draft of the working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iluvleiberman Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. If there is a WW II type situation I would support a draft
There might be one to fight North Korea (which I would not support even though we have to help SK)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. might make the politicos take this war shit
more seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. The selective service should be manditory for all
that said, I have to justify this. And admit problems with selective service. Couple of notes:

1) To get federal financial aid for college, men must register with Selective Serv. Not women. Not fair.

2) I feel we are all equal as humans, and if there is a just war, we should be willing to serve as our beleifs allow.

3) The poster who made the note that women are unfairly represented in government pointed out an important fact. How can we draft women without their being properly represented in their government?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeniB Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Maybe if they did more of the tough stuff like joining in the draft
the guys would take them more seriously and vote them in. Besides, I think women are pretty much represented as much as they want to be in government. You have to look at how many women are trying to get these jobs as opposed to men. It may be that the same percentage that try for the offices of each sex get appointed or voted in or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeniB Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes
I have an 18 year old son and I think it would be even easier for his friends that are girls to be drafted than the boys. Girls have an easier time getting acqainted and feeling at home than boys do. It's also a different world. I think girls would do well and I don't think it would be fair to send all of the guys off to war and leave the girls behind to take all of the good jobs because they don't have to go. It's not like the old days when they gave the jobs back after the war. It would give them a leg up in their careers.

I really think they could be in combat too. I think a lot of them would want to. But I wouldn't push that. At least if they took the non combat jobs, that would be less guys needed in total anyway. So maybe there would be a chance that every son wouldn't have to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignoranceisstrength Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. draft women too
As an eighteen year old male, almost nineteen, I have not yet signed for the draft, and refuse to do so until women are required to as well.
Not just women, though. I want to see the sons and daughters of the wealthy go to war beside, since it's their daddies that are benefiting from the slaughter, not mine. None of this AWOL from a fucking national guard unit...
Even then, I'm still not signing up until the Chickenhawk-in-Chief is out of office and the War Against Iraqi's ends. No matter who is required to sign up, I refuse to die for Haliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. You are in the perfect position to sue the government for equal
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 10:27 PM by brigadoon
rights within the selective service system. Call the ACLU and ask them if they would be interested in representing this. I think this is the time to fight this injustice.

On edit: I also think it would bring people into real life when they have to face the havoc that this war may bring to their children.

I picket once a week against this war and I often wonder how many of those representing the other side have no children or just female children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. Hi ignoranceisstrength!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
74. I want to see those pampered lovlies of bush march off to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
32. Everyone should be eligible for the draft, and just to
make things fair, if a person is not fit for military service they should have to do community service at the same rate of pay for the same amount of time.
With the obesity problem, in this country most folks would not be taken into the service.

However, 18 year old with a child/ren, need to automatically get community service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
33. 13th Amendment
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 10:24 PM by Ein
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. f

No one should be drafted, if we would start and partake in only just wars, the draft would not be needed. There is no draft to demand equality in. That said, many service age women were not required to register with selective services, so it would be a big hassle to make it equal.

The real question is not should women be drafted, but is why the hell would anyone let themselves be drafted.

(The constitution doesn't seem to matter in these times) :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. For some reason I've never heard that mentioned
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 11:11 PM by Hippo_Tron
That's a great point against the draft, the only problem is that if somebody were to bring that up the supreme court would overturn it. Nowhere in the constitution does it mention that free speech does not protect obscenity, yet we all know the outcome of the Roth case. BTW the whole concept of a draft seems stupid to me, if Americans aren't willing to step up and fight a war then we don't have a war, it's that simple. Why would you put troops on a battlefield who are there against their will, how do you know they won't sabatoge the mission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. My point is
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 11:18 PM by Ein
It's all bullshit. As far as my knowledge dictates the Constitution has been ignored and ripped apart since the Alien and Sedition acts. It's now being ripped apart by the breakup of peaceful assemblys (i.e. protests), and the suspensions of habeus corpus among other things in the Patriot Act.

I read Zinn's "A Peoples History of the United States", found many parts regarding the revolutionary period as very cynical (and from an obviously biased Marxist viewpoint), but the more I see throughout history in instances where the Constitution was blatantly violated (many a times in the case of the clause thats states we must abide by treaties we sign), I fear Zinn might be right: The constitution used liberal rhetoric to set the middle class in line (the middle class being a buffer), further the interests of the elite at the time (by shaking off the people who capitalized off of them), and nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. I agree with you completely
But I can tell you right now that if you debated this argument with any conservative he/she would tell you...

"Well if we're breaking the constitution by violating the Bill of Rights then you liberals break the constitution all the time with your federal government social programs that the constitution doesn't give you them the authority to do."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #33
49. Service is NOT servitude
I like the community service option. Give everyone who signs up the option of choice -- military or community service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
36. It might help to make people less likely to enter needless war after
needless war. Maybe they would think a little harder about the committment of troops and war would become the extremely rare defensive event it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
38. Not really
I just really see no reason to change the system. Besides women are still discriminated in several instances even though it is against the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. yes...
if men have to register...so should women.

Of course I believe nobody should have to register for the draft, if you can't get the volunteers..either they are being underpayed or badly used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fescue4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. All or none IMO
Its sexist to only allow men the privledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkgrl Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
43. Isn't the real issue about men being distracted
by women during combat? Thats also why women are not allowed in submarines, last I checked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
44. Absofuckinglutely.
If I'm gonna die in anyone's war, there better be my sister right by my side.

Or are you girls/gals/women/womyn for equality when it only benifits you?

Can't have it both ways. Either you're for equal rights, and all the COSTS as well as the benifits, or you're an opportunistic hypocrit.

I'm for total equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SyracuseDemocrat Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
45. The decision should be up to them
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 01:06 AM by SyracuseDemocrat
They should have to or not have to. But if they want the right, they should not have the choice. Selective service registration should be MANDATORY, just like it is for guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
46. Of course.
If the draft is reinstated and I hope to hell that it's not, both women and men should be drafted.
It's not fair that only men should go. Then on the other hand, until women get total equality, I don't think it's fair to draft them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
47. Fairness
We have not redefined effectively what our military is as of yet though obviously the face and function of it has changed dramaticaly in recent times.

When I was in high school we all took the asvab. I scored an 92% in the mechanical aptitude and 97% in the spatial quality catagories overall. As a female my scores were in the 100th percentile. The Marines had a hard on for me for 2 years.

Even then the military was moving away from brute to brains. There are many reasons for needing a physicaly strong person in the military but increasingly it is about balance. You must be smart and strong.

I have only one child, my genetic eggs lie in one basket alone. She is 15 years old right now. We are closer than many teen/parent pairs. She will still hold my hand at the mall and kiss me in public. Would I bite my nails to the wrist if she were required to register ---- OF COURSE! But if she were my son instead of my daughter would that make her less valuable or vulnerable? No.

The draft should be based on the ability to serve - - - ONLY. Not race, gender, not college status, not rich daddy status, not having "other priorities". If you are a true contientious objector you should have to prove that status by some battery and then serve in a humanitarian role.

I do believe if the nations daughters and mothers were put in peril it would be more difficult for politicians to treat war so lightly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
50. yes of course
so if you are looking to find a double standard amoung feminists here, I think you will be disapointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusk2003 Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
53. NO Here Is Why
Becasue that will give the wrong message to politicans that society finds the draft accpetable instead of repulsive. Instead the ONLY time their should ever be a draft is if America gets invaded like a foreign country is trying to take over. Which would make millions sign up and fight or stand on their rooftop and fight along with their neighboors. A draft has never been for the right reasons vietnam,Korea,and civil war, etc. So I think it is evil and should be abolished. The current bill to reinsate the draft inroduced last year by the Congressman from Newyork includs women which is not proberly not likely to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Never?
You mean that draft during WWII wasn't appropriate? Didn't we also draft in WWI? Were you opposed to that? How about the Civil War?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mushroom Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. repulsive is right
Yup, I totally agree. I don't see how drafting women because men would be drafted has anything to do with sending the message NO WAR, NO DRAFT. It wouldn't be about equality (of all places, the military?) because the women would be drafted for fairness to understandably frightened men and their parents, not for their country. It really just smacks of "an eye for an eye" and I don't think women should fall for such silliness to prove their worth as women and feminists. The games people play.

Mushroom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
55. Yes, equal treatment
Women combat units in israel have proven VERY effective, so i see no reason why not to have women in all areas similarly to men provided the physical strength is there.

A women holds the world record for free diving, deeper than any man... methinks its about time we force the equality issue across the board and remove sexism from the common.

The old fashioned view that women should not fight serves only to undermine women in a social quest for justice. Perhaps if your dear little daughter will be drafted and die in the next imperial adventure, you'll not be so inclined to vote in a war-fucker.

The draft is unequal as it stands. It should be a lottery of social security numbers... unbiased in all ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
56. Yes.
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 07:29 AM by DarkPhenyx
Absolutely!

Are not women the equal of men? Are they not as equally capable of filling slots in the military? Are they not deserving of equal oppertunities adn protection under the law?

With all of that equality come responsibility. Can't have it both ways. To demand such is to be...well...hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garage Queen Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
57. Yes, we should.
However there should still be a high "physical fitness" requirement for those serving in combat. If a woman can measure up to the physical standards of combat, she should be in combat. If not, she can be in a support position, like Jessica Lynch (driving a truck, being a mechanic, etc.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
59. Nobody should have to register for the draft...
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
60. YES
I may be a woman but that doesn't mean I shouldn't serve my country.

Better to be a soldier than a victim...I think that all women in combat zones (military or civilian) should be armed to the teeth... I bet rapes would plummet in the war zones if that were the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
64. Yes, all men and women without exemptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
65. I remember a young woman in the armed forces
during bush war I being interviewed on the tube about the role of women in the military. She replied, "If it is wrong for your daughters to kill and be killed in combat, why is it not wrong for your sons?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
66. ABSOLUTELY! It's the only fair and balanced way...
...to approach the situation. And, while we are at it, let's take away ANY AND ALL deferments or special interest packages. If one of-age citizen of the US has to register for the draft, then they all should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuck Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
67. yes. women are ideal for combat. here's why....
women handle pain much better ... think childbirth

women are better at endurance activities than men of similar health ..... marching, carryin' shit, etc.

women are more likely to think before they do something violent

women need less food/water than men

besides, if this were a policy (not that i am for the draft, i think the concept is unamerican), then maybe -- just maybe -- young women would be more encouraged to keep up with physical activity through adolescence, and athletic women would not be stigmatized (come on, you know it happens.

seems to work okay in israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slappypan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
68. countries that draft women
Teens and War

"The following countries will draft women; Angola, Chile, Israel, Libyan Arab Jamahirya, and Paraguay. The following countries will draft women as non-combatants (support, humanitarian and medical roles) on an as needed basis; Croatia, Yugoslavia, and Switzerland. "


I say, why not, maybe if women were drafted there woud be fewer bloodthirsty Peggy Noonans and Ann Coulters running around exhorting the men to go off and kill people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
69. I think it will further the feminist cause
There are men out there who will not support the ERA and other equal rights legislation until women become equals with men in that they might be required to serve their country in war. There are men that say that women want all of the benefits and none of the responsibilities of being male. We should prove them wrong every chance we get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
70. Of course...AND assigned to combat units
I'm for full equality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
72. Yes ! I say this as a woman
It wouldn't be fair to only take the boys .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
73. They should have to register. It is right and it might make people
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 06:32 PM by efhmc
think much longer and harder about starting wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
75. yes
I don't think there should be a draft, but if it comes to that, I think women should be drafted too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
76. Yes
Its a hi tech army, lots of jobs for women. If women want equal pay and opportunity they have to share the same social responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarbyUSMC Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
77. Yes or better yet, it wouldn't be a bad idea for able bodied
boys and girls to serve a two year enlistment after high school. The benefits, including tuition, room and board in a four year state college would be:

1. Not going to college when not knowing what major they want.

2. After the military they are more likely to stick to one college rather than college hopping.

3. They wouldn't be going out on their own with no experience in the work force.

4. They would experience:

A. working as a team.

B. working at something that may translate to a good job in the civilian world.

C. possibly seeing something of our world before being too committed to job and area.

D. Opportunity, if disciplined, to save money for two years.

E. Definitely a help to the country but mainly they will come out of the service with maturity and still be under 21.

What convinces me that this isn't a bad idea is the videos I see of Spring Break. Spring Break in Florida or another sunny place vs. kids volunteering to do something worthwhile and humanitarian during their break. Maturity might change the choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
78. absolutely, women should register
there either IS equality, or there ISN'T equality. no qualifiers needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike_from_NoVa Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. Yes women should register
I am one of the minority who support mandatory national service for all 18-20 year-olds regardless of class, religion, or gender. Here's my reason:

American society has a huge problem. Most of our young people are not invested in America or American Society. They couldn't care less. Sure there are anti-globalization activists (and junior dems - and I'm sorry to make it sound like you don't count - because i really think you do) representing a small to moderate percentage of all young people. This percentage is no bigger than the percentage of young adults in the military (and any halfwit junoir rethugs out there), but it is dwarfed by the majority percentage of young people who don't watch or read the news, don't vote, probably don't have jobs, are even often in jail, but still don't really give a shit one way or the other.

Only 50% of voting age Americans vote. 'CAUSE PEOPLE DON'T CARE. I want people to start caring again.

If we want a society that fosters civic responsibility, engagement and pride, we are going to have to make the youth of America get off their obese Play Station asses and get involved. Otherwise we are going to continue to have what we've got today - and it ain't pretty as far as I'm concerned.

Furthermore, if everybody were required to do mandatory national service, with the majority being in the military, we will see a lot more diversity in the political makeup of the military, and, more importantly, in the PARENTS of the kids in the military. This would lead directly to more congressional interest in taking their constitutionally mandated war-declaration responsibilities seriously and likely lead to a much more sober and serious foreign policy.

I think those who are knee-jerk opposed to the draft and madatory national service should seriously consider the small-d democratic benefits to our society that would accrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC