Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guess what Joe Wilson told me today (the yellow cake guy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:23 PM
Original message
Guess what Joe Wilson told me today (the yellow cake guy)

Well, me and about 2000 others. Jay Inslee put together a panel in his district to discuss Iraq and former ambassador Wilson was on it. Someone yelled out that they enjoyed him on the Daily Show -he said he had enjoyed doing it.

But my BIG news....One of the questions for him was about his wife and whether there is an investigation about that. He couched his answer in a hypothetical-

(I paraphrase until the last part)

"If that had happened and she isn't an agent, she would have much explaining to do to friends and business associates. It would be very inconvenient and could be seen as an intimidation of others who might speak in dissent toward the admin.

Were it true, lives could be put at risk. Were it true, there would be first an internal examination by the CIA- I assure you there are many professionals there that know what they are doing.

The FBI would then investigate- Even though Ashcroft is the AG, there are many professionals there as well. In that case, I would surely offer to be of any assistance to them that I could be.

Trust me when I say, nothing would please me more than seeing Karl Rove frog marched out of the White House in handcuffs -and when I use that name, I've measured my words"

The bold part is nearly verbatim -I wrote it down as soon as he said it. ROVE. :bounce:

TWO THOUSAND people. On a Thrusday. In the afternoon. In the suburbs. I am so impressed with my community.:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad you were there to
relay what you heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. wow!
:wow: Unfuckinbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. would it be Rove in trouble?
or would it be Novak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They both should be "in trouble" ...at either end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Novak didn't break any laws
Whoever was bound by oaths or no-tell rules or whatever- those in the govt- at the WH- they broke the laws. If Novak were in court and the judge told him to spill his source and he didn't, the judge could jail him on contempt.

Wilson didn't say this today- But I did read an article in which he said Novak hadn't broken the law. The other people, IF it happened, did. A ten year sentence, I think he wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. good fuckin deal..
Bring it on! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. AAAHHHhhh- That's what Jay said
You remind me- Inslee was answering a Q about the lazy media- he said "Rolling back the FCC regs is going to be a hot topic when Congress reconvenes. Bush said he'd veto, I say bring it on" Very cute, is Jay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
42. Both, but more so for Rove.
It sounds to me like Wilson has strong reason to suspect that it was Karl Rove who leaked the information to Nofacts. If so, Rove should be jailed, but nothing will come of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are fortunate to live in a "community" like that!
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 06:31 PM by zidzi
Thanks for reporting this so well, party_line!

Great line about rove! I saw Joe Wilson speak on c-span and I think he is a formidable foe for the ever, on going, sleezy bushes.

We have the best People on our side! :bounce:



edit; spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if he thinks that Rove
was one of the senior white house officials that novak mentions as his source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. that would be the implication he is trying to make
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. That's how I interpreted it
Purely hypothetical, mind you. That he was somehow involved or aware or something. I was surprised Wilson would say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Think ... NO the CIA knows who Novak talked to
Rove could be in jail.....

What am I saying this is a Bush run CIA/FBI/DOJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:44 PM
Original message
Nothing comes out from this WH without the knowledge and
support of KKKarl Rove. He runs the whole place. He is behind everything that the WH does, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. there's pretty much ample proof of that...
EVERYTHING this administration does is political. Even Alan Simpson was aghast to find out that they poll more than any administration he'd ever seen. They will jettison dearly held positions (like free trade to protect Pennsylvania steel) for the simple expediency of winning. It's all about control and power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. ROVE ! ! ! !
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. THAT is a SCOOP!
That is incredible! Oh my God how I would love to see Rove in handcuffs! Almost as much as Wilson would. This is the BEST news I've heard in a LONG time. Wilson is my HERO!

Something's happening here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. Yes--something's happening. Wilson has been very cool and
measured. And he was a diplomat after all. He wouldn't have said this without meaning to. I guess he's ramping up the pressure for a reason, and on purpose. Verrrry interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. A real American hero
Kudos to Ambassador Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You know, he kept saying
that he'd been in other countries where if someone spoke out they'd be jailed or killed and that this was no big deal. -That this is America and the Constitution guarantees us the right to speak out. I kept thinking to myself, So far, cross fingers.

He did say that John Dean had written that he should have secret service protection. -He didn't get it but he thinks the govt is really hoping he doesn't so much as stub a toe, so they don't get blamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. I want to see him frog marched too!
What is frog marched?

Thanks for your report, party-line!

I am so happy that Mr. Wilson is continuing to speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. ....
frogmarch

v 1: march a person against his will by any method 2: carry someone against his will upside down such that each limb is held by one person

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Can we put tar and feathers on him first?
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 07:05 PM by notadmblnd
can we, pretty please? can we? :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here's the process, according to David Corn
http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=888

<snip>So if a crime of this sort has been committed, where's the investigation? In a July 24 letter to FBI director Robert Mueller, Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, requested that the FBI "immediately launch an investigation to determine the source of this information and assess whether there is enough evidence to refer the matter for criminal prosecution." In a statement, Schumer noted that investigations into such leaks are not unusual. In June 2002, the FBI investigated the allegation that someone had leaked classified congressional testimony provided by Lt. General Michael Hayden, the head of the National Security Agency. The Bureau, according to Schumer, questioned 37 members of the House and Senate intelligence committees and about 60 staffmembers. Vice President Dick Cheney had been one of the instigators of that inquiry. "The current scandal," Schumer says, "is just as serious as the one from June 2002." He adds, "This is one of the most reckless and nasty things I've seen in all my years of government. Leaking the name of a CIA agent is tantamount to putting a gun to that agent's head. It compromises her safety and the safety of her loved ones, not to mention those in her network and other operatives she may have dealt with. On top of that, the officials who have done it may have also seriously jeopardized the national security of this nation." (Without knowing exactly what Wilson's wife did for the CIA, it is not possible to judge fully the consequences of this leak. But Schumer's melodramatic appraisal could well be justified.)

Is the FBI hot on the trail? Not exactly, not yet. And that's partly because the CIA gets to say whether there is a full-fledged criminal inquiry. In other words, the CIA will determine if the Justice Department and the FBI investigate Bush administration officials. According to several government sources familiar with leaks investigations, this is how it usually works: if the CIA learns of an authorized disclosure of classified information and wants to see the case pursued, it refers the allegation to the Justice Department. The DOJ then evaluates the legal issues and decides whether to have the FBI investigate. After Schumer made his formal request to Mueller, the FBI kicked the matter over to the CIA, according to a government source monitoring the case. Does the CIA want an investigation? Mark Mansfield, a spokesman for the CIA, declined to comment. And what about the congressional intelligence committees? A Senate intelligence committee source says that committee members have made inquiries but that nothing major is likely to happen until the CIA informs the Justice Department that it suspects the law was broken. <more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Hmmmmmm...so it's up to Tenent
Wonder if he's a real American or just, as I suspect, a careerist asskisser hellbent only on keeping his job. Probably he's using the spectre of putting Rove in the clink as an insurance policy. I'll be plenty surprised if this thing ever leaves the CIA's front door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. rove in handcuffs
be still my beating heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Karl Rove in handcuffs!!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That is my DREAM!
Can it be? Can we cuff Chimpy & Dick too, if they knew about it? OH pleasepleaseplease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. MUST READ! Lookee here, everyone!
:kick:

Incredible news! Joe Wilson, don't fly in small planes. Don't stand on bridges. Don't walk in the woods. Don't open envelopes. Don't drive your car in deserted suburbs late at night. Don't fly at all, Joe Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Just another story the media drops....for Taco Bell 'arnold' voting.......
this makes sense ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. cthru, the media hasn't got this story yet
This is a SCOOP by our own party_line, intrepid reporter. And if the FBI prosecutes Rove for this treasonous crime, I don't CARE whether the media covers it or not. But they WILL. It will be too delicious, they won't be able to resist. ROVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. They did say there was media there
I was with a few hundred in an overflow room (Inslee and Wilson came in to thank us and jawed for a few)

I don't know how the media could put it. As far as they could go would be to report "measured words" in a "hypothetical". Not really prime time news media ready- maybe only editorial stuff so far.

It's more a glimpse into what the possibilities could be- by someone involved, who covered his buns as best he could in saying what he did. But that sliver of hope? I'll take it and I knew it would do some of you all good, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. To me it doesn't sound like a hypothetical
Is that really what you got from it? That last sentence sounds to me as if he is clearly naming names in couched phrases, covering his ass but making the message very clear. Isn't that the intent you got?

"and when I use that name, I've measured my words"

I don't take that as a random hypothetical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't either, BUT
as I noted, his answer was couched as a hypothetical. He said that more than once.

It's ridiculous, of course, not to see through the hypothetical so I agree with you that he actually meant it. I just don't think the papers can print it as gospel if he actually said it was hypothetical.

And that quote you copied specifically, I asked the woman next to me if I had it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Well, there's no reason they can't quote him exactly
and let the world infer what they will. I think this is HUGE. I see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. AP was there--there's an article in today's P-I (different section--
national). I posted it in your other thread. BUT there was no mention of this. Oh, I WISH C-Span had been there! But then, if there'd been cameras, he might not have said it in just that way... Thanks so much for reporting it, party_line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. The advance coverage of this is not bad
Edited on Thu Aug-21-03 07:41 PM by Stephanie
Let's see how they do on the follow-up:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/136021_intelligence21.html

<snip>A week after Wilson went public, syndicated columnist Robert Novak quoted anonymous government sources as telling him that Wilson's wife was a CIA operative working on the issue of weapons of mass destruction.

Lawmakers from both parties have decried the report, saying the leak effectively "burned" the wife's cover -- if she were in fact a covert agent.

Inslee said yesterday that he had no idea whether Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. But he said the leak could be a violation of federal laws against naming a covert operative who has worked overseas in the past five years.

The questions Wilson raised point to the need for a full-scale congressional investigation of how the war was justified, Inslee said -- and whether the administration relied on faulty intelligence or even manipulated it to serve its own ends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. ROVE?----KKKARL the KLUCKER ROVE?
yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!yes!!!
yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!!yes!!!

yesssss.

This is still early initial reports, or unreports, but from bloggy seeds
and rumor do smoke and fires erupt. The language makes one think the number two felon is Rove's subordinate (or peer) among the half-dozenish available "senior White House" skunks.


'nothing would please me more than seeing Karl Rove frog marched'

Makes you think the accomplice would not be Unka Dick Chaney. Or, if it is, then perhaps he's got a note from the doctor, other priorities, something shielding him from prosecution.

Drat.


But Karl Stinking Rove! yes!!!yes!!!

link http://www.bop.gov/ipapg/ipamission.html

Wonder if there are any state charges possible? Wire? Conspiracy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Kick for ROVE in Handcuffs n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
38. Nothing on this in google or news.google today
How do we get this quote/story into the press?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Here are the locals that covered the meetings
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=Inslee%2C+Wilson&sa=N&tab=wn

But this mention of Rove, particularly interesting to me, was not an evidentiary kind of thing. It wasn't a direct accusation. It was part of an answer clearly defined as hypothetical. What would they write? A Democrat wants Rove to take some knocks? He may know something that led him to make that statement, and I suspect he does- but *nothing* factual was revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yeah, you're probably right.
It just isn't a "story" yet. But thanks for your original post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
41. That is such good news. Thanks
What a brave man he is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Andy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
43. Remember, misuse of the FBI & CIA was what did Nixon in!
Edited on Fri Aug-22-03 11:03 AM by Liberal_Andy
So they can frog march Chimpy & little Dick right behind KKKarl.

"Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be 'a high crime' under the Constitution's impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-consprircy statute, which renders it a felony 'to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.'" John Dean

http://writ.findlaw.com/dean/20030606.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
44. KKKick Karl.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Thank you for the post, it gave me hope that something is being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC