Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Depleted Uranium Killing Vets faster Than Bush Gets Troops Killed In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:06 AM
Original message
Depleted Uranium Killing Vets faster Than Bush Gets Troops Killed In Iraq
Edited on Wed Aug-27-03 11:07 AM by protect freedom impe
Depleted Uranium Killing Vets faster Than Bush Gets Troops
Killed In Iraq

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268636.shtml

author: Yes Magazine
Depleted uranium exposure from the first gulf war is killing American veterans faster than Bush's war on Iraq is killing troops every day. Ten times as much depleted uranium munitions has been used in the second war on Iraq. The Pentagon continues to ignore the health effects of depleted uranium on its troops and war victims. Its suggestion? Duct tape. The Bush death legacy continues.


- - -]

The War Against Ourselves

An Interview with Major Doug Rokke



Doug Rokke has a PhD in health physics and was originally trained as a forensic scientist. When the Gulf War started, he was assigned to prepare soldiers to respond to nuclear, biological, and chemical warfare, and sent to the Gulf. What he experienced has made him a passionate voice for peace, traveling the country to speak out. The following interview was conducted by the director of the Traprock Peace Center, Sunny Miller, supplemented with questions from YES! editors.

QUESTION: Any viewer who saw the war on television had the impression this was an easy war, fought from a distance and soldiers coming back relatively unharmed. Is this an accurate picture?

ROKKE: At the completion of the Gulf War, when we came back to the United States in the fall of 1991, we had a total casualty count of 760: 294 dead, a little over 400 wounded or ill. But the casualty rate now for Gulf War veterans is approximately 30 percent. Of those stationed in the theater, including after the conflict, 221,000 have been awarded disability, according to a Veterans Affairs (VA) report issued September 10, 2002.

Many of the US casualties died as a direct result of uranium munitions friendly fire. US forces killed and wounded US forces.
We recommended care for anybody downwind of any uranium dust, anybody working in and around uranium contamination, and anyone within a vehicle, structure, or building that’s struck with uranium munitions. That’s thousands upon thousands of individuals, but not only US troops. You should provide medical care not only for the enemy soldiers but for the Iraqi women and children affected, and clean up all of the contamination in Iraq.
And it’s not just children in Iraq. It’s children born to soldiers after they came back home. The military admitted that they were finding uranium excreted in the semen of the soldiers. If you’ve got uranium in the semen, the genetics are messed up. So when the children were conceived—the alpha particles cause such tremendous cell damage and genetics damage that everything goes bad. Studies have found that male soldiers who served in the Gulf War were almost twice as likely to have a child with a birth defect and female soldiers almost three times as likely.


more..................


Originally published at:
http://www.yesmagazine.org/25environmentandhealth/rokke.htm

homepage: http://www.votetoimpeach.org/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. why aren't bush's daughters over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The aristocracy need not mix with commoners.
God said so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perish the thought!
Why they don't even expose themselves to "contamination" from anyone outside their exclusive circle. Wonder where they got that trait?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheRedMan Donating Member (588 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually
the US has been working feverishly to replace DU in munitions. The problem is that DU makes an outstanding penetrator, because it is EXTREMELY dense, hard, and has unique self-sharpening behavior on impact. Oh, and it is cheap as all hell. Modern armor tends to make less potent slugs ineffective. But the problem of DU dust's asbestos-like properties are well-known and there has been much work in the field of metallurgy to find a replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect freedom impeach bush now Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. sure <sarcasm>
sure <sarcasm>

thats why the US has used 10x the amount of Depleted
Uranium in the Bush Family's 2nd Iraq Oil War Grab than
was used in the first Bush Family Iraq Oil Grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC