Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How satisfied are you with the candidates we have?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: How satisfied are you with the candidates we have?
There is still alot of talk of Wes Clark, Hillary Clinton, and even Al Gore getting into the race. How satisfied are you with the current field we have?
Dean
Edwards
Kerry
Kucinich
Mosley Braun
Sharpton
Lieberman
Gephardt
Graham
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TSElliott Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Won’t be satisfied till...
Clark throws his hat into the ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. You could drop 8 and still have an excellent field
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well Said!
Dennis for President!


Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez and Dennis Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budmo Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Drop 8 is right!


GO DEAN!!!:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think that they are pretty good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Should only be Gore, Graham, Dean. Maybe Kerry, Clark, Gephardt.
That's it.

Should have been Gore/Edwards 2000, or Gore/Edwards 2004.

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Loaded question - Dean is the only one worth a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That isn't true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsteinVeblen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary will not, not not run in 2004. She is content to wait until 2012 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Very satisfied and very unsatisfied
have been neck and neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Very satisfied here (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Anyone would be better than Bush but
I would prefer to have President Gore run for re-election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stilpist Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. IMO, each of the nine has strengths
and weaknesses. Ditto the possible additions.

I will support the Democratic nominee as vigorously as I am able, no matter who is nominated. Sharpton to Lieberman. Ralph Nader. (Iknow, I know, he's not in the running; I'm just making a point.)

BUT! I want the pretender gone SOOOOOO MUCH that I long for a Supercandidate. Someone so obviously right for the job that they'd be an obvious 65-35 shoo-in. Someone like Al Gore with Bill Clinton's charisma. Maybe there never is or was such a one. Maybe one of the current crop will prove me wrong and blossom. But it's tough to beat an incumbent, even an unelected one.

I'm hopeful, but I'd like to be cocksure. Then I'd be satisfied.

- stil



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jagguy Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. the field is lack lustre but Edwards is terrific !
no offense, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-28-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. This poll is proof...
...of how many trolls are at DU.

That many Unsatisfied? Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC