Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lockheed Martin to Pay $38 Million for Overbilling Air Force

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:21 PM
Original message
Lockheed Martin to Pay $38 Million for Overbilling Air Force

http://www.spacewar.com/2003/030827213051.yuysn61a.html

Lockheed Martin will pay the US government 37.9 million dollars to settle accusations that it inflated the cost of contracts for the US Air Force, the justice department said.

However, the company was awarded $17 billion in defense contracts in 2002, up from $14.7 billion in 2001. And another $4 billion multi-year contract with the U.S. Air Force and the Marine Corps for the Hercules Aircraft for 2003.

In 2003 they got a $106.6 million contract for Paveway II GBU-12 and –16 Laser Guided Bomb (LGB) kits, as part of a $281 million contract.

And they benefited from the $1 billion in contracts that the Pentagon transferred to Lockheed after the Boeing spy flap.

The government had also accused Lockheed Martin of purposely inflating a contract proposal for a foreign military sales contract under the Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) programme. The US government had hoped to sell the equipment to Saudi Arabia, Greece and Bahrain as a means of offsetting a cost over-run on another Air Force contract.

In announcing the settlement, Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler warned that Lockheed should be an 'example' to other companies that try to overcharge government agencies.

Example:
$17 billion defense contracts
$14.7 billion defense contracts
$4 billion defense contracts
$106.6 million defense contracts
$1 billion = $37 billion+

Sweet. Immunity from government penalties for abuse, as long as we keep them on the dole...

I know. Those are old contracts. But the year’s not over yet.
The company reports 80% of its business is with the U.S. Defense and federal government. And Boeing, their main competetor is banned from future rocket contracts...

What did we pay to prosecute these guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eablair3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's some example
"In announcing the settlement, Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler warned that Lockheed should be an 'example' to other companies that try to overcharge government agencies. "

yeah, ... what an "example" ... overbill supposedly on purpose, ... maybe get caught (how many other times have they done this and not got caught?), ...and at worst pay a small fine,.... and then get awraded hundreds of millions or billions in more contracts. yes, some "example."

when are they going to start revoking corporate charters? and holding individuals criminally responsible? and, maybe not allowing those that engaged in such activity to work in a corporation again. Aren't these people that do this a "threat to national security"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hear! Hear!
when are they going to start revoking corporate charters?

this is imperative if we're going to create positive change

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-03 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. more
How do they get these contracts?

Peter Teets, the former president and chief operating officer of Lockheed Martin who retired from the company in late 1999,
presently serves as the director of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), undersecretary of the Air Force, and chief procurement officer for all of military space, controlling a budget in excess of $65 billion, a figure that includes $8 billion a year for missile defense and $7 billion annually for NRO spying.

To date, it is believed that the NRO has provided slightly more than $500 million each to Lockheed Martin and Boeing.
http://www.webnetarts.com/socialjustice/laertes.html

Former Lockheed Martin Vice-President Bruce Jackson was a finance chair for the Bush for President campaign; Vice-Presidential spouse Lynne Cheney is a former board member of Lockheed Martin, and used to receive $120,000 per year from the company for attending a handful of semi-annual board meetings.

Chris Williams, lobbyist for Johnston & Associates, is one of nine members of the Defense Policy Board to have ties to defense companies. His firms represent Lockheed Martin, Boeing, TRW and Northrop Grumman.


Does this threaten national security?

Lockheed faces China trade charges: The US State Department accuses Lockheed Martin of giving sensitive rocket technology to China in breach of US export control- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/704327.stm


The strange bedfellows of China
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16340


'China acquiring missiles at faster rate'
http://www.bday.co.za/bday/content/direct/1,3523,1401369-6079-0,00.html

Lockheed has been named in at least 33 cases concerning overcharges on govt. contracts, improper technology transfers to China, falsifying results on nuclear saftey tests, job discrimination, pollution, and more.
http://www.the-catbird-seat.net/LockheedMartin.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC