Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why did * originally skimp on foreign aid?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:31 AM
Original message
Poll question: So why did * originally skimp on foreign aid?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I vote other because I think Bush truly does not give a fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm with you. I think he probably wasn't aware or if he was
he didn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Oh I think he was more then aware. Do you understand what you are saying
if you believe for an instant he wasn't aware that a crisis of this magnitude had happen in plain sight of all the billion dollars worth of shit we got in the sky and ground? That is some scary shit. If you want to say he didn't understand. I can buy that. But wasn't aware my God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Agree...malignant narcissism eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smbolisnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Ditto! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Other: the zealots he follows didn't ask him to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Honestly, I don't think he thought he was skimping...I could picture him
saying....while waving his hand like it's nothing...
"We'll send'em 100 grand. That'll be good enough, now watch me clear this brush."

I'm sure he'd been brieft to his satisfaction but he didn't care to know the scope, watch the news or anything. I'm sure he didnt' want to be bothered @ first.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. because he wants us liberals to be blamed for spending $$$
I'm sure his advisors knew that concerned Americans would be crying out for more aid to be sent and in this way he can put the blame for the price of the aid squarely on the American people. So when we are suffering from our own disasters, he can just shrug and say, too bad the money is not there, it was your choice to send it to a foreign land.

This is just the way they think. It also gets him points with his hate-filled extremist "base" who believe no aid should go to anyone at any time anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Except * spent it this time. Just to save face from the rest of the world.
And if the Dems don't stress that little point, then I actually would consider voting for Jeb in 2008. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. They want privatized charity
The bush nazi's don't belive in public charity, as it strikes them
as "welfare" and transfers, all of which are taboo to this lot of
corporate welfare queens in the white house.

I guess he presumed that america's churches would fill the gap left
by his stingy miserly inaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Even though they support massive subsidies to giant corporations.
Robin Hood in Reverse: Hood Robin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rush told him to
Apparently Rush has been jibber-jabbering for the last several days bashing the tsunami victims.

In his drug-addled brain, he thinks the number of victims is being over-inflated by the countries and aid agencies in order to get more financial aid. Seriously. He thinks they're lying about the amount of destruction. Just like the Holocaust.

Apparently, Bush agreed with him. Nice to know our leader is following the advice of a bigoted drug addict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Other because he is far removed from reality... Similar trait found in
Hitler. Human compassion not dignified with his seal of approval. Cut some more brush wannabee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. bush did not change his mind and up the amount of foreign aid to an
impressive one until his darling brother JOHN the hypocryte ELLIS BUSH
joined the departing COLON who can still believe in me POWELL. BUSH could not send his brother looking empty handed so he sent him with a promise of 350 MILLIONS ... but, do not forget, the bushes like to promise but seldom do they deliver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. When I first glanced at the headline you posted, I read it as...
Why did Bush skim off foreign aid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. He doesn't give a shit so
he figured no one else did either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. It was Christmas holiday time, and he got caught with his pants down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodriguez94 Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. typical Republican
Most repubs I know are selfish and don't care about other people to begin with...only Dems are compassionate and you know it...he knew about...he just didn't care enough to interrupt his vacation...sort of like he didn't care enough about threats of terrorism to interrupt his vacation of August 2001!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Where did I say anything in my post about compassion...or lack therof?...
...And at the risk of being flamed (I'm sure I will) I will disagree that ONLY Dems are compassionate, which implies not one single Republican is compassionate. We can argue about levels of compassion (and I will agree that Dems are generally much more compassionate than Repubs), and targets of that compassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodriguez94 Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. compassion
you are correct...those repubs are still in the closet...they are DEMS and don't know it yet..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC