Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Most Outrageous Word of the Year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:37 PM
Original message
Most Outrageous Word of the Year
From the American Dialect Society's annual awards for best and worst words of the year. This one was edited out of most papers.

The overall word of the year was red/blue/purple state.

Previous year's winners can be found hear:
http://www.americandialect.org/woty.html

http://slate.msn.com/id/2112150/

The Most Outrageous category is tricky; we never agree whether it's the word itself that's outrageous (typically for having some vulgar element, as in 2003's winner, cliterati, for "prominent feminists") or the concept (as with 2002's neuticles, "false testicles for neutered pets"). This year the strongest contender was santorum, defined (and heavily promoted) by sex writer Dan Savage—in a campaign to besmirch the name of right-wing Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum—as "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex." We dismissed one potential problem—that newspapers wouldn't print the term if it won—on the grounds that we shouldn't censor ourselves. And indeed, in the afternoon's voting, santorum did win, but many newspapers simply skipped this category in their coverage. So much for academic freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
progressiveBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who would have thought a word from Savage Love would become so popular
lovin it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cliterati?
Oh my.

Neuticles?


LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe next year
'slutticus' can be a contender. LOL

Just have to think up a good definition for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've made up one of my own!!! : FRISTING
Fristing: Engaging in an unsafe sexual act with a Republican senator.

Think we can get it nominated next year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wouldn't 'fristing'
involve unnatural acts with a cat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd like to nominate "intelligent" and "intelligence"
The first as in "Intelligent Design", the fun new name for Creationist pseudoscience;

The second for pre-war Iraq "intelligence". A contradiction in terms if every there was one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC