CNN: Judy acknowledging "Neocons" and world domination

Must_B_Free

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:10 AM
Original message

CNN: Judy acknowledging "Neocons" and world domination

Edited on Sat Jan-22-05 01:11 AM by Must_B_Free

That's what I saw. "Spreading freedom around the globe" "Who to attack next?" They are now openly talking about the agenda and pinning it to its owners. And I got the idea that the media sees it as preposterous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

liberalhistorian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message

1. One can only

hope and desperately wish that that is what's finally happening!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LostInAnomie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message

2. *'s speech couldn't have set a clearer agenda of imperialism.

I have been amazed at the number of people who couldn't see through his code words of "freedom", "liberty", "tyranny", etc. They all point to the fact that he plans on forcing our way of life on others, especially those who suit our economic interest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

NeoTraitors

(351 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2

5. If you have read about PNAC

and heard the speech yesterday, then you know that it is time to stop these fascists before they get us all killed.

Why would we expect countries on *'s shitlist to shrug their shoulders and do nothing? I'm thinking they will try to pre-emt the pre-emter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Clark2008

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #5

8. Some of us have known about the PNAC since 1998

But, I was married to an Arab, so it was BIG outrage in that circle.

I cannot, for the life of me, understand why they think this is big conspiracy shit? The paper was mailed to Clinton. The goals are online. It's not hidden. And their sigs are there.

Or do reporters just not know how to investigate anything anymore?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Stevepol

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8

11. Investigate? What does that mean? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BiggJawn

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #11

12. Investigate? does that involve a Teleprompter?

They now tie Prompters to computer networks, so THEORETICALLY, Karl Rove himslef could enter the stories from his Ratcave.

They're pretty blatant. Now re-elevtion possible, seems they're not afraid of Impeachment, so now they let the real story of what "Pax Amerikanner" is slip out...

And Judy Woodward is a "Journalist" like I'm an Enterologist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Jawja

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12

18. Not that they're

not afraid of impeachment, but they believe that the 'Murkin People gave them the "go ahead" in November by so called "re-electing" them to four more years.

They are not only NOT afraid of impeachment, they are NOT afraid of the ballot box. They are in until the 'Murkin People rise up and throw them out. It will have to get much worse for that to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

w4rma

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8

19. Few believed Hitler's Mein Kampf, until he was well into implementing it.

Deja vu?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

flordehinojos

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message

3. oh, so the media is going to act SHOCKED now... they knew it all along,

but as long as it was bush's covert mandate they went along with the thing .... now that he is overtly exposing his dictatorial soul, they are going to act shocked ...... tsk, tsk, tsk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Swamp Rat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message

4. The media AND individuals like Judy are accomplices to genocide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

For PaisAn

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #4

7. Let's take it a step further

Anyone who supports Bush & Co. are complicit in their crimes against humanity. I'm not buying the ignorance excuse anymore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

laura888

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7

21. agreed! they cannot have it both ways

worshipful coverage of Bush one day (including soft-focus camera)

and

incredulous indignation next?

nah - doesn't fly....the worshipful coverage is probably THE reason he was re-elected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Deja Q

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:39 AM
Response to Original message

6. Give the media enough $$$ and they'll shovel it out equally too.

They've been that way already.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

JohnOneillsMemory

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 01:55 AM
Response to Original message

9. The media are giving the current cover story a bad review. Rewrites coming

This is all the MSM do when public outrage at their bullshit erodes their viewership. They offer tepid criticism to keep their own ratings from disappearing.

This happened at the time of the 'press conference' where the Emperor said he couldn't think of a mistake. The MSM took one step back from his newly brown-stained pants.

"Oooh. Go change your pants, sir. We'll be here when you come back in a new suit."

A brief tsk tsk period and they will be applauding a new fiction once it is written and sent to them to market at us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

shadowknows69

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 02:11 AM
Response to Original message

10. they'll comdemn it out of one side of their mouths

and drool out of the other side as they're deploying the iranian war imbed reporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DemExpat

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #10

17. Yeah, that is my vision of the media too...

DemEx

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pdxmom

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:34 AM
Response to Original message

13. I'm an optimist and hope that the media will soon wake

to the knowledge that they have been used and abused by this administration. What Bush talks about does not bode well for the press and they may actually realize it before it's too late. If you take all of it together, you soon see that one of their goals is to control what the press says and can do. Access is administered based on who sucks up the most. And the media is being played for the fools that they are. Maybe their enlightenment is coming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

justiceischeap

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #13

20. I too am an optimist

I also understand that if journalists speak out too loudly against any administration, they are sent to Siberia (poor Helen!). However, the media, right around the time the Repugs came to power in the Senate during Clinton's administration have been accessories to dumbing down the majority of people in this nation. They throw out scraps every now and again, like the horse and the carrot but until these media outlets are owned by more than 3 companies, they will never report with accuracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Prisoner_Number_Six

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #13

23. I'm a realist and believe it's too late by far to

have a chance in hell of bringing these people under any sort of control.

We're screwed, and we're gonna stay screwed for a LOOOOOOOONG time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kahuna

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message

14. Bush said he was going to spread freedom around the world during..

the debates. Weren't they listening??? And just what did they think he meant?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

cthrumatrix

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #14

16. exactly.... we knew it...they knew it and are "enablers"

we don't have an informative media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Mika

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message

15. So many "Green Zones", so little time. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

leesa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-22-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message

22. That's right Judi....war crimes time! I hope to see you on the dock.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue May 14th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.