Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talking Points: More bad news for Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:11 PM
Original message
Talking Points: More bad news for Bush
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

"Some news the White House really didn't want to hear. According to a new Washington Post poll, 69% of Americans think a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the Wilson/Plame matter. How serious is it? A very serious matter (48%), somewhat serious (34%), not too serious (7%), not serious at all (9%). -- Josh Marshall "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
starscape Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. AMERICA IS WAKING UP
It's about damn time. Will the damn break before this regime leads our country straight down the crapper?

THanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Josh Marshall is all over this story
Can a blogger win a Pulitzer prize? I think we need a new category this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Link is Here
http://www.pollingreport.com/bush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now, now, calm down...
Edited on Wed Oct-01-03 05:33 PM by BeatleBoot
If this scandal were serious, then it would involve sex.

Do we really need a special counsel to investigate treason?

<sarcasm on>

on edit: to change the verb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-03 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ashcroft can't possibly investigate this
he's losing all credibility with his claims about wanting to push for strict convictions, while allowing right wing crimes to go unpunished, or at least minimally punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC