Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The women were leftie sluts, they deserved it,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:46 PM
Original message
"The women were leftie sluts, they deserved it,"
See, according to the Freepers, if you are a leftie, you deserve to get groped by Arnold. And you don't deserve for it to count. Gee - what does he get to go to women who actually dare to vote? Pus their face in the commode?

"To: republicanwizard

Let me guess, it was on a rowdy movie set, it doesn't count. The women were leftie sluts, they deserved it, he's such a wonderful guy to admit it, show he has great character, it was in the past.


4 posted on 10/02/2003 9:58 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obviously the lobotomy took.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. What gets me is that all they think this requires is an apology!
Isn't groping people a bit more than an accident or breech of etiquette?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. These guys idea of foreplay would be saying "git in the truck bitch" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I thought it was "Hump or Dump"
What "Morans"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. it definitely is MORE than a breech of etiquette
it's a pattern that's indicative of his over-blown sense of privilege. i hope the nexxt woman drop-kicks his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like I said- send this to the Fresno City Atty-
They need stuff like this to help make the just label of 'Hate Group' stick to FreaKKK RepubliKKK. Do your part- future litigators will need this ammo to bring them down for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not to defend the Freepers, but...
I think that particular post was obviously being sarcastic about the lengths to which Arnold supporters would go in order to dismiss the damning evidence. That's why they started with the snide "let me guess" comment.

I actually assumed it was a DU mole calling the idiots on their shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Freepers do truely act like DUers being sarcastic.
Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 01:00 PM by w4rma
That's why, on DU, one should always note that you're being sarcastic. It is very hard to tell sometimes.

Don't automatically assume that the Freeper is being sarcastic. Most likely that Freeper is exactly serious.

Note, the "Let me guess," part makes me wonder if the Freeper is sarcastic also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I completely disagree with your assessment.
Edited on Thu Oct-02-03 01:08 PM by Melinda
I think it's the original assumption that's in error. The post at freeperville is obvious sarcasm which, as we all know, requires that one possess a certain amount of "wit" - and in this case "wit" + "freeper" = one hell of an oxymoron.

And then there is context in regard the original "assumption", but I digress.

Yes, that post was much more likely the result of an infiltration OR it came from the actual conservative side of that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yep - it positively drips sarcasm = obviously NOT a freeper post
To accuse the person who posted that of being a "freeper" is intellectually dishonest at best.

DUers can do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:53 PM
Original message
Jesus Christ these people are fucking monsters
Be ready. During the reign of Emperor Jeb, they will be coming for us...and everyone who disagree with the Emperor/Fuehrer..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. This "freeper" post...
...actually sounds more like a lefty infiltrator to me. I sense a lot of sarcasm in the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curlyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Sarcasm is right
I read the whole thread over there, and it was definitelya sarcastic remark.

I take great delight in making fun of freepers and their stupid remarks, but this wasn't one. There are plenty of other serious remarks over there that are fair game if you can get through without a DNS error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Or the McClintock faction
The post is clearly sarcastic, attacking the Arnold apologists.

However, if you read the whole thread, you should note deep divisions within FR about the Schwartzenegger candidacy - one post accuses the moderators of moving the thread from "Breaking news" because of support for Arnold.

A little reading nuance is useful here. This particular poster is anti-Arnold, but may not be a leftist infiltrator for all that. McClintock still gets 15% in the polls. I think the FR set is the majority of that 15%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. And I'm sure if he took it even farther
and raped them, I'm sure they deserved it as well. :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:

If these neanderthals have girlfriends or wives, what do you think the chances are that they beat them?!?! I'm sure it would be justified because they made them do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. these people are spawned....
they can't possibly have mothers, sisters, daughters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. The comment was sarcastic, and an attack on the pro-Arnold faction
You are reading it incorrectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. The behavioral pattern is what's most disturbing...
This is consistent behavior over the span of three decades. An established pattern that suggests a genuine sensitivity problem.

In its most basic concept, Arnold's history of inappropriate contact is no different from any habitual sex offender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC