Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do Communists and Republicans hate unions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:35 AM
Original message
Why do Communists and Republicans hate unions?
"The worldwide modern union movement was started in America by Americans. Unions are based on the American ideal of democracy, one person one vote, and economic democracy.

The first thing the Communists did when they took over a country was to make all independent unions illegal. Republicans, like Communists, hate unions, and try to destroy them whevener they can. That's why Republicans love Communist China so much, and want to send our jobs there. In fact, Lenin and Stalin, like Republicans, constantly attacked strikers and warned of 'leftists' and 'liberals' that were 'destroying the country.'"

A post from another forum ... what do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny, then, how many commies got beaten, maimed, and killed
fighting for the American worker's right to organise.

Quite a lot -I'd guess a large majority- of American commies were like Italian commies: real commies. I.e., on the side of the people. That stands in contrast to the Bolsheviki and similar, who were common-or-garden-variety psychopathic totalitarians exploiting the people under an attractive rubric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Leninists and Maoists are *not* communists
Communism is a state-less form that society can take, that has absolutely nothing to do with the totalitarian regimes of these countries. They are more accurately described as totalitarian socialist states.

For more information go right to the source, the Communist Manifesto.

Marx and Engels described a situation where there was a worker revolt against ownership and government. The natural evolution of this was a utopian state where government was not needed and where all production was held by the public at large and the spoils of labor was shared equally.

(Obviously a pipe-dream that assumes that the "worker" is by nature unselfish and that the owner is by nature "selfish").

Under a totalitarian state any form of organized resistance to the status-quo (which is pretty much the definition of a union :) is something to be feared and suppressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think you need to get your facts right in the first place
the unions in America were gutted from within by anti-socialist reactionaries during the 1940s and 1950s. Taft-Hartley was the other nail in the coffin of the labor movement.

American unions have been in a straight-jacket for decades!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. because they can't control them
pretty simple, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Huh?
Edited on Tue Oct-14-03 11:57 AM by FDRrocks
The soviets under Lenin did have a big say in things. My little toe has more socialism in it than Stalin could ever claim. Examples from this guy? I dunno.

Heres a pertinent quote from a man named 'Pen'

"The American workers are very combative -- as we have seen during the strikes. They have had the most rebellious strikes in the world. What the American worker misses is a spirit of generalization, or analysis, of his class position in society as a whole. This lack of social thinking has its origin in the country's whole history"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Lenin was the first to fire on strikers
Lenin called the dock workers "counter-revolutionary" and ordered the army to fire on them - at the same time he was ending democracy in the Red Army. Lenin constantly railed against "liberals" and "left communism" - by which he meant direct worker control of factories, independent labor unions, and civil rights.

Lenin could have been a Rockefeller Republican, instead of corporations he favored centralized "ministries". The Communists became huge fans of US-style Taylorism, which dehumanized workers and co-opted their skills.

While Marx's analysis of class was useful, his cure was worse than the disease. The beauracracy became the new ruling class and the beauracrats became the new rulers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. The idea of a soviet, or workers council is an furtherance of a union
it is what happens when the union gets rid of the management across the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. they hate them for different reasons
Republicans hate them because they think they stand in the way of unfettered capitalism and the "free" market. Read that "social darwinism". Remember that hard rightists are social darwinists at the core and see nothing wrong with "worker exploitation" as it is the natural order of things for the weaker to be exploited by the stronger.

Communists don't like unions because, in an idealistic communist society, they wouldn't be needed. Communism preaches the ultimate "dictatorship of the proletariat", making unions unnecessary.

In reality, unions are a part of a capitalist society, a working check on the excesses of capitalism. A very american thing, if you ask me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC