Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Take a look at the cartoon that the Washington Post has censored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:25 PM
Original message
Take a look at the cartoon that the Washington Post has censored
The Post announced that it will not run the Boondocks comic strip this week. The strip will return on October 19. Here's the first day of this week's strip. See:

http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/10/14/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. WP propping up it's PNAC whores
Must use excuse that this is sexist rant. Yeah, that's it. It's sexist.

It's not cause we're trying to help SmirkCo and the M.E. conquest. It's sexist. That's the ticket.

Everyone will buy that one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Screw the Washington Post
Here in Philly the Philadelphia Inquirer ran it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, um, why....?
Is there a comment somewhere that explains what's so offensively unpublishable about that comic? Condi is above criticism? No jokes about senior administration officials' love-lives (or lack thereof)? What?

Seems pretty well within the normal range of political cartooning to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I like your tagline image - (heh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's surely no worse than Mallard Fillmore.
I can't believe the Post would ban it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. This may be the wrong strip
The online strip runs about a week behind the print edition. At least it seemed to me the "masturbation" online strip showed up a week after the print controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I can't wait for tomorrow's strip
Looking good, Aaron!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, I don't get it. Why censor this?
Nothing wrong with it.

The weirdness continues .......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IkeWarnedUs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe the problem is . . .
Condi doesn't want a boyfriend - she wants a girlfriend.

Maybe . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's been my theory since day one....
"Not that there's anything wrong with that!" - Seinfeld

It's just that the hypocrisy is so irksome, you want to make fun of her! If she is a lesbian, and I truly believe she is, then by all means have at it. But don't live a fucking lie just to kiss up to these RW scumbags who'd see homosexuals thrown into gulags before they give them anything remotely close to marriage (which I don't even understand why any homosexuals want any part of that institution anyway).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuckinFutz Donating Member (852 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. maybe...
Dubya's her boyfriend. They're made for each other, when you really think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Dub and Condi playing the black and white cookie...OMG...
That one actually made me laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw that this morning ...MoonAndSun posted it...didn't know
the washpost censored it, though, ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it IS sexist
I doubt Aaron would imply any guy needed a girlfriend/wife to prevent him from trashing the world. However, is this the reason the WP is censoring it? HELL F***ING NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. that's probably it
they probably have a policy against perpetuating stupid sexist ideas in their comics pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reachout Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. LOL
McGruder representing!

I even like this one better:


http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/10/04/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. How about this comic panel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC