Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems seek inquiry into whether oil executives lied to Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:08 PM
Original message
Dems seek inquiry into whether oil executives lied to Congress
Democratic senator calls on Senate leaders to seek inquiry into whether oil executives lied to Congress
RAW STORY

Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) called on both Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) and Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) Thursday to join him in pressing the Attorney General for an investigation into whether top oil executives made false statements during a recent Senate hearing when they said they did not meet with Vice President Dick Cheney about energy policy. His call was subsequently joined by Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid (D-NV).

During a joint hearing of the Commerce and Energy Committees on Nov. 9, senators heard testimony from the CEOs of the nation’s largest oil companies. When Lautenberg asked these witnesses whether their companies had participated in Vice President Cheney’s energy taskforce in 2001, they denied -- answers that were later contradicted by a report in the Washington Post. Cheney has refused to disclose who he met with at those meetings, citing executive privilege.

“If witnesses believe that the laws requiring truthful testimony before the Senate will not be enforced, our hearings will lose their usefulness and the Senate’s oversight abilities will cease,” Lautenberg wrote in his letter to Senators Frist (R-TN) and Reid (D-NV).

Reid concurred.

“I find it deeply disturbing that energy company CEOs may have made false statements before Congress about their involvement in the secretive Cheney energy task force," Reid said in a statement to RAW STORY. "Despite the Vice President’s active efforts to thwart open and transparent government, Congress has the right and the responsibility to seek and obtain information from witnesses that is honest and complete. When evidence arises that some of the statements made to Congress may be false, it calls into question a witness’s entire testimony and undermines Congress’s constitutional role."
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Democratic_senator_calls_on_Senate_leaders_1201.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HillDem Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad they weren't sworn in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lying to congress is a crime regardless.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Insist they testify again under oath
Catch 22 - tell the truth and verify your previous lies. Lies again and be prosecuted. Oil Executives can thank that wonderful statesman, Ted Stevens of Alaska for not requiring you to be under oath the first time you lied. And a very warm and cordial fuck you to ted stevens from all the wonderful people of New Orleans who don't give a fuck what you think about what should be rebuilt and where. Let me refer you to the rebuilding of Anchorage, on a fault line, with federal dollars - asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Stevens was an asshole that day!
He needs an intervention by an Alzheimer professional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the Dems take back the house in 2006
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 04:15 PM by Lannes
It will happen but I doubt anything will come of it before then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dem's seek?
Why shouldn't each party have subpoena power, shouldn't matter if they're in the majority or not. Say your congressperson is in the minority that takes away their effectiveness, and doesn't let them represent the district that elected them.

I watched the big oil guys on CSpan the other day, and couldn't believe my ears when the Dem's were shouted down by the Repub's and allowed big oil to testify without being under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. That will NEVER be investigated. That's why they weren't sworn in.
The repukes knew this was coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC