Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

4 yrs. later & bush STILL hasn't gotten bin Laden...what a WIMP!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:47 PM
Original message
4 yrs. later & bush STILL hasn't gotten bin Laden...what a WIMP!
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 04:57 PM by mopaul
the failure to find or kill or bring to justice the man who 'supposedly' attacked us simply means bush has failed us all utterly, and his war is all the more pointless.

where the fuck is the man who attacked us, killed 3,000 and got away with it scott free? it's like he never existed, and like bush never said he'd get him, dead or alive.

how can bush's supporters brag about the man who LET OSAMA GET AWAY and is unable to find him for four fucking years? oh if it had been Clinton, you bet they'd have held his balls to the fire.

just like they called his daddy..a WIMP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. the man who attacked us, killed 3,000 lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is not important and Bush and Co knows that
I do think the zealots have taking over the terrorist movement. It is world wide now with Bush and Osama's aid. I think the time to get him was right after 911 and now he does not even have to turn up to be the push for these people.If Osama did not get it world wide the Bush group did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir_Snooze Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. We know why.
It's because the US troops didn't actually land in Afghanistan until 2 months after war was declared. That gives Osama plenty of time to escape.

Besides, Afghanistan was merely a ploy. They needed to look serious about getting him, but really they didn't care. Besides, a republican (Reagan) taught Osama and co. how to fight. They even gave the Taliban money to fight the "reds".

The real goal was Iraq; always was, always will be. That's why you're "staying the course", or whatever, and not doing the logical thing by escaping while there's hope.

Who's fault is it? The republicans on two fronts; teaching the Taliban to fight (1982) and by letting their leader escape (2002). Al Bush wanted was to help Halliburton along in it's quest for profit. And that quest lead the cowboys straight into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, Bush has made the world safer!




...for Osama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. a home run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. If it was Clinton that had let Osama run free for 4 years+
Every night, Fox News' 6:00pm broadcast would lead off with, "Good evening, I'm Brit Hume. It's been 1,500 days, 4 hours and 2 minutes since Bill Clinton said he would get Osama bin Laden dead or alive. Bin Laden is still free. And, in other stories..."

And, the crawl on the bottom of the screen would run the count every cycle as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC