Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Right’s New Strategy: Anti-Alito = Anti-God

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:37 AM
Original message
The Right’s New Strategy: Anti-Alito = Anti-God
The Right’s New Strategy: Anti-Alito = Anti-God
This morning’s Washington Post previews the right-wing’s new counterattack against Alito opponents:

Several conservative groups, meanwhile, plan a major push beginning Monday to portray Alito’s opponents as anti-God. Talking points for the effort, which will involve ads and grass-roots organizations, were laid out in a strategy memo by Grassfire.org…

Here’s an excerpt from the memo:

First, let’s call out the groups that are attacking Judge Alito from behind their “independentcourt.org” moniker. Who do we find when we lift the veil? The ACLU, People for the American Way, NOW, NARAL, AFL-CIO, Human Rights Campaign, MoveOn.org, Americans United, NAACP, NARAL (see link at end for the full list). And what theme unites these groups? An agenda to purge any and all references to religion from our public lives.

But there a few members of the coalition that Grassfire doesn’t mention:

– The Interfaith Alliance (“A national grassroots organization of 150,000+ individuals of faith and goodwill drawn from more than 75 different religious traditions.)

– Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (“Representing Episcopal, Presbyterian, United Methodist, United Church of Christ, Unitarian, and Jewish national organizations.”)

– National Council of Jewish Women

– Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

The memo says that these groups, and all of the others in the coalition, oppose Alito because they are “radical secularists.” These kind of dishonest tactics suggests that Alito’s backers are worried.

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/03/anti-alito-anti-god/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well that's ok.
When it comes to implementing the christian god as law I am very anti-god, primarily because I am very pro Constitution. But don't expect the "faithful" to understand that view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a tacit admission
that Alito's qualifications are based purely on his religious extremism.

Unfortunately, the country doesn't seem to mind such extremism, as long as it's Christian and not based on any other religion.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. This post actually suggests a clever strategy for us.
As I was reading the part about "members of the coalition that Grassfire doesn't mention" it crossed my mind that we might be able to come up with an equally cynical response to these people. Call their bluff and lift the veil...

Run an ad with the theme: "Why Religious Organizations Oppose Alito":

Grainy, evil-looking picture of Alito. Slightly ominous voice over, explaining that religous organizations oppose Alito because he is opposed to the religious freedom guaranteed by the first amendment to the Constitution. Show long list of religious organizations that oppose the Alito nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arianrhod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not sure that would work,
but I'm absolutely in favor of trying it.

How do we go about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's real Christian to shoot an unarmed boy in the back for stealing $10
and cut every social program for poor children and poor women who soon will be forced to give birth to MORE poor children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And don't forget no condoms, no birth control..just abstinance...not
a very popular stance at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nitrogenica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let them try...... It will be the next Schavio...
The more they play to that base (less than 20%) the more the approval goes down. Thet's not be blind here there's a lot of bad things for Bush coming, a long dreary succession of problems with everything his administration has touched. They can't do anything right.

Like we're all just gonna downplay 10 dead troops, yeh right. People are not THAT stupid. In addition they're not stupid enough to buy that war on Christmas crap either. (ummm Holiday's means HOLY DAYS).

20% (or less) of our Country buys this crap, the rest of us don't.

Goodbye RepubliCAN'T'S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BjohnsonMN Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. So does that mean Alito=God?
We really are all going to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Save me a spot if you get there first n/t :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC