Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Ritter: Iraq war ‘deliberate deception'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:21 PM
Original message
Scott Ritter: Iraq war ‘deliberate deception'

http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/652/652p7b.htm

Many pro-war politicians attribute the failure to locate weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to mistakes made by Western intelligence agencies. For Scott Ritter, former chief United Nations weapon inspector in Iraq between 1991-98, it was “deliberate deception” designed to force regime change.

...

Ritter said that after President Bush Snr laid waste to Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War, his government voted for UN economic sanctions on Iraq while disarming the country. Comprehensive weapons inspections by the UN Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) virtually eliminated Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons capability by 1998, a fact the CIA also recognised, Ritter said. Despite this, the primary reason Washington gave for the 2003 invasion was Iraq’s supposed stockpile of WMDs.

“These were politicised intelligence reports designed to sustain a policy of regime change, as opposed to being a genuine effort to disarm Iraq. We had fundamentally disarmed Iraq; we had accounted for 90-95% of their WMDs.” The primary motivating factor for Washington’s disarmament policy, Ritter said, was “to provide justification for initiating actions that would terminate the regime of Saddam Hussein”.

Asked about recent revelations surrounding the US military’s use of white phosphorous and depleted uranium munitions in Iraq, Ritter replied that the main issue remained the illegal nature of the invasion — the ultimate war crime. “The crime isn’t the use of white phosphorous; the crime is American troops in Iraq pummeling Falluja in violation of international law. When we set the military loose they’re gonna do their job, they’re gonna terminate life.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's right.........
As usual. Moreover, the need to take saddam out didn't really encompass "régime change". That implies taking out the entire government apparatus, which wasn't necessarily the aim. The real aim was to get rid of Saddam and leave a régime friendly to the US intact.

You can't have it all ways, however. If Saddam goes, the Ba'athists go. If he stays, he remains a sort-off ally, but is not a controllable asset.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC