Particularly after they served us so poorly in the theft of the election by bush both in 2000 (Florida) and in 2004 (Ohio).
Regarding the writing at the above sites, here is what is said at The Longtail, a blog by the managing editor of Wired Magazine:
The folly of zero-sum thinking
Rich Karlgaard, one of my favorite writers, now has a blog. Here he explains why zero-sum thinking is the "world's worst disease". Excerpt: "Meanwhile, the most energetic, original and positive writing has been migrating to the Web and to blogs. No surprise here. Anybody who creates a blog is: (a) an entrepreneur and thus probably NOT a zero-sum thinker; (b) a producer first and a consumer second. These two attributes alone guarantee that the blogger probably has a more accurate view of the world, and how it really works, than does the zero-sum thinker toiling away at his Mainstream Media position." Here, for those who enjoy watching them fall, are a few links to blogs that are tracking the fall in their stock prices. This is also from The Longtail:
Stock performance over the past 12 months:
* Belo (BLC): -11.6%
* Emmis (EMS): +8.7%
* Fisher (FSCI): -3.1%
* Gannett (GCI): -24.2%
* Gray (GTN): -38%
* Hearst-Argyle (HTV): -6.9%
* Media General (MEG): -17%
* Meredith (MDP): -2.4%
* New York Times (NYT): -30.7%
* Sinclair (SBGI): +29.1%
* Tribune (TRB): -24.8%
* Young (YBTVA): -80.2%
-------------------------------
Average: -16.8%
Dow: +4%
See that blog at:
http://www.thelongtail.com/the_long_tail/For those of you who like stock charts, you will see the above companies in chart form here:
http://donatacom.com/archives/00001125.htmCher
p.s. note that Sinclair bucks the trend. Those who have been around DU for a year will recall that last year, Sinclair was hitting a low. They had been downtrending for quite some time. They hit their low at the time they broadcast the anti-Kerry program right before the elections. My point is that they may appear to be bucking the trend but they really are not since they are coming back from a low.