Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Donor Network Right to Refuse Organs from Homosexual, Says Christian Doc

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:08 PM
Original message
Donor Network Right to Refuse Organs from Homosexual, Says Christian Doc
Edited on Wed Dec-07-05 11:20 PM by jefferson_dem
Granted...this story comes from a hardcore fundie news source but still...it's a harsh reminder of just how fucked up some people and things really are :mad: -->

(AgapePress) - Friends and family of a Tucson man are crying discrimination after the homosexual man's organs were rejected by the Donor Network of Arizona. However, a Kansas surgeon who works in organ transplantation says the decision was a good one.

Albert Soto, 51, intended to donate his eyes and other tissues after death, but a spokesman from the Network says the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta has established guidelines allowing centers to reject donations from men who have had sex with men in the last five years. Dr. David Pauls, a spokesman for the Christian Medical Association, says those guidelines are needed regardless -- even if the donor is HIV negative, as in Soto's case.

"Number one, HIV in early stages cannot be detected on testing; it takes a little bit there," Pauls explains. "But even if he's HIV negative, there's other infectious diseases that are fairly common within the homosexual population -- particularly hepatitis, which can be a very deadly complication in somebody who receives a transplant, and that sometimes also can be missed by screening."

Pauls says the organ donation and transplant business is heavily reliant on trust. "Trust is probably one of the most valuable commodities we have," he says. "If I ... as a physician am going to be doing a transplant, I'm want to do everything I can to make sure that the organs or the tissue that I'm transplanting is safe and is not going to cause other problems or other diseases in that patient."

<SNIP>

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/12/72005g.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gay = Diseased?
This country is getting taken over by Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm. That's a very difficult situation.
It is NOT gay bashing at all, but transplants have sooo many problems already, if there's any question at all of adding additional problems, I sure can understand the medical reasoning.

I very close friend had a pancreas transplant 5 years ago, and I really do understand most of the risks. They have to try to have everything as close to perfect as they can get just for survival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do these morans think they'll turn gay
just because they receive an organ transplant from a gay guy?

This is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. The blood donor center at the school I went to
(very much not Red Cross, but they probably have similar standards) routinely asked if I had sex with men in the last so many years. I forget how many. Maybe 5. Maybe fewer.

"Yes" meant "we'll take your blood and throw it away, untested". They'd test for HIV anyway. They also asked if I had visited prostitutes or used needles, or had sex or certain kinds of contact with HIV-positive individuals. If I had, my blood would been pitched. All were risk factors for HIV and other viruses, some difficult to detect.

(I was even CMT negative, which meant they liked my blood: it could be given safely to AIDS patients and other immune-system compromised patients.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-07-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think that the Red Cross asks if SINCE 1977

though it's been a while since I last gave blood so it may have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC