Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"THE FUCKING SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS IMPORTANT"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:19 AM
Original message
"THE FUCKING SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS IMPORTANT"
Rummy Dum Dum


I don't know what's more disturbing - that Rumsfeld is lying when he claims that he doesn't know of anybody who made cost, casualty, and length predictions about the war or that THE FUCKING SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DIDN'T THINK IT WAS IMPORTANT TO MAKE COST, CASUALTY, AND LENGTH PREDICTIONS ABOUT THE WAR. That isn't to say those predictions would have to be perfect, but at least you would, you know, make them for planning purposes.

War, you betcha. Let's do it! We'll worry about the details later. SHOCK AND AWE BABY!
http://atrios.blogspot.com/

Rumsfeld Lies About Pre-War Predictions: “You Can Take That To The Bank”
Yesterday on PBS’ Newshour, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said no administration official made any predictions about the length or cost of the war in Iraq:

I was very careful. I never predicted any number of deaths or the cost or the length because I’ve looked at a lot of wars, and anyone who tries to do that is going to find themselves wrong, flat wrong…I don’t know anybody who had any reasonable expectations about the number or the length of the war or the cost of the war. I just don’t — no one I know went out and said these are how those three metrics ought to be considered. And you can take it to the bank.

The truth is, Rumsfeld and other top administration officials made predictions on all three metrics. You can take that to the bank –

with examples of lies & more at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/12/09/rumsfeld-predictions/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Incompetence at the highest levels
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think it's called "conflict of interest".
They're quite competent in seeing to their interests, regardless of any conflicts wrt other interests they're supposed to be looking after.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Planning is hard
So we don't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. He's moving closer to RumsFLED every day!
I just hope to God the rumors about Lieberman getting tapped for the post aren't true...or if they are, he has the good sense to say, "NO THANKS".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. eh. Jomentum going to this thankless post isn't the worst outcome
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 11:43 AM by bunkerbuster1
Puts a Reep-apointed cannon fodder in his place to finish out his term. Opens up his seat to a real CT democrat to be elected in '06, potentially. And as long as Joe is no longer an "elected Democratic official" we'll have fun pissing on him as he fumbles one impossible Bush edict after another.

Just looking on the bright side, is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. And than they'll blame him
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 12:57 PM by FreedomAngel82
If they are thinking about replacing Rumsfeld it's so they can blame him and the rightwingers will all jump on it too hoping Rumsfeld will get away. Whoever remembers Wolfowitz now days and how wrong he was about everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. They didn't need predictions. God told bush there'd be no casualties.
And Heaven knows, God only speaks truth to bush. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. At one time
the Department of Defense was known as the Department of War. Rumsfeld would have been the Secretary of War.

A much better title for him I think.

I do not think Liberman has the proper nature required for this position.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. FUckjaws (*) told Reverend Pat three'd be "NO CASUALTIES". Hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, I remember it clearly.
They said it would not be a long engagement. Two years tops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't he say it'd be six weeks tops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."
Feb. 7, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, to U.S. troops in Aviano, Italy: "It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-03-31-then-and-now-usat_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. + 3/27/03 Wolfowitz
http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/iraqquotes_web.htm

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz: “There’s a lot of money to pay for this that doesn’t have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people…and on a rough recollection, the oil revenues of that country could bring between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years…We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. So where is all that money going?
My guess is all those private Bush friendly contractors like Halliburton. While we're going in debt they're going up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's a dangerous old fool. He should have been dumped long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's a dangerous old fool. He should have been dumped long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's a dangerous old fool. He should have been dumped long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. You can say that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. LOL...good one...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. He means to say that he never gave Dick Cheney predictions.
It doesn't matter what he says to the rest of us, that's just PR anyway.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. HA! I can't remember his name but they fired a guy
for claiming that the war would cost over 200 billion dollars. They also fired Shinzeki for saying they would need 500,000 troops to get the job done right. When Bush had the nerve to claim in a press conference that he would make no decisions on his own, that he would listen to his Generals I wanted to dive through the TV and punch his lights out. This administration and all the people who support it remind me of my first wife. Just couldn't stand to be wrong. Will say anything and do anything to be "right". You could not possibly win an argument with her/them because when you use the facts and debate them into a corner they will just pull some shit out of thin air to make themselves right. I wish I could divorce the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. On September 15th 2002, White House economic advisor Lawrence Lindsay ...
http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/iraqquotes_web.htm

On September 15th 2002, White House economic advisor Lawrence Lindsay estimated the high limit on the cost to be 1-2% of GNP, or about $100-$200 billion. Mitch Daniels, Director of the Office of Management and Budget subsequently discounted this estimate as “very, very high” and stated that the costs would be between $50-$60 billion


Paul O'Neill, Lawrence Lindsey Fired

Aired December 6, 2002 - 18:00 ET

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0212/06/mlld.00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks pants.. sometimes I should just get off my lazy ass
and look shit up when I am going to make a post like that.... :toast: These assholes fired everybody who was right about the war. How sad is that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. And don't forget all those generals who told him he was wrong
about WMD's. Even the most decorated general told Bush he was wrong and they didn't even listen to him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. I would be willing to bet,
that when Rumsfield offered his resignation to Bush twice, as he stated, he did it with the same sincerity that Cheney had when he was hired by Bush to look the nation over for the best Vice-Presidential candidate in the land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. I don't think so
I don't think so with that. I think Rummy just told that for the press. Iraq is one of his babies. Go to pbs.org and try to find the film "Rumsfeld's War." In this film it lays out how involved Rummy is and how he told Bush not to worry about anything with the "war" but to let him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I agree with you, Iraq is Rummy's war. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. I remember a good while back
listening to Bernie Ward's show and he had the guy on there who wrote the book "Losing Iraq" and this guy was apart of all the pre-war intelligence planning and everything. He said that Colin Powell wrote a 1,000 page document on EVERYTHING that could happen and they ignored it and probably him. Powell predicted everything that is happening now back than before they started going public with the war. And remember Rumsfeld went on "Meet the Press" and said they knew EXACTLY where those WMD's were. In Baghdad. And Poppy Bush told that taking Baghdad was key to bringing down Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. War without end courtesy of PNAC nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC