Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rhandi talking about air marshals now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 03:18 PM
Original message
Rhandi talking about air marshals now
Wow, it's scary. She's telling how they hire people who have trouble backgrounds such as violence and drinking etc. 104 prison guards turned air marshals were found in 155 incidents while on their prison guard: falling asleep on duty, physical abuse of inmates, inappropriate relationship with inmates wives, misuse of government property, treating female inmates horribly etc. This was in 2004. Only caught 32% of violated reports. Only contacted once about these conducts. This is very scary. :\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's Randi
Yea scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Thank you!
I see a lot of people spelling it "Rhandi". It's becoming a pet peeve. Back in the Clark-Dean rivalry days a lot of people spelled Gen. Clark's name "Clarke", and it really bugged me!


I guess i have an anal-retentive streak.

But seriously, who the hell spells Randi with an h?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Protect people from what?
Edited on Fri Dec-09-05 04:54 PM by K-W
Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Guaranteed in 30 minutes or less?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. hehehhe
buh bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. They had a split second to make a choice
Why did they have to make a choice? What made them believe this man posed an imminent threat? What did they base their choice on? I believe there ought to be some minimum criteria to justify the police shooting someone. I'd like to know how this man's actions satisfied that criteria.

From what I am reading now, the man never claimed to have a bomb. The marshalls say he was "acting like" he had a bomb. What the hell does that mean? If we grant police broad powers to shoot suspicious people, we will wind up more endangered by the police than by any terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Wow, An RFA. . .shoot first, ask questions later, then cover up!?!
Enjoy your time here, moonbat. . .you won't be here long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. MOONBAT556?
You have GOT to be kidding me!!!

I Hope you enjoyed your stay.... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankybubba Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is supposed to be while they
were prison guards right?? not as air marshals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. right EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankybubba Donating Member (818 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. thanks just making sure i read it right...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well I feel safer now! NOT! What a joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC