Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Karl Rove be indicted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:18 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will Karl Rove be indicted?
More at: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_seen_to_press_for_Rove_1213.html

Fitzgerald still looking to indict Rove

Short of a last minute intervention by Rove’s attorney, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is expected to ask a grand jury investigating the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson to indict Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove for making false statements to the FBI and Justice Department investigators in October 2003, lawyers close to the case say.

Rove failed to tell investigators at the time that he had spoken about Plame to Time Magazine reporter Matthew Cooper and conservative columnist Robert Novak, both of whom later cooperated in the case. Novak outed Plame in a July 14, 2003 column.

The Chicago prosecutor briefed the second grand jury investigating the outing last week for more than three hours. During that time, he brought them up to speed on the latest developments involving Rove and at least one other White House official, the sources said. The attorneys refused to identify the second person.

As of Monday, neither Rove nor his attorney Robert Luskin has explained Rove’s misstatements to Fitzgerald’s satisfaction, those familiar with the case said. Eleventh-hour testimony from Time Magazine reporter Viveca Novak—who Rove’s attorney Robert Luskin fingered as a crucial witness in keeping his client out of court—does not appear to have been helpful in dodging an indictment, they added.

More at:

More at: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_seen_to_press_for_Rove_1213.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. A recent R*ve photo
showed him walking with Chimpy. Everyone was laughing because he was kind of bent forward. Well, it looked a lot like he was having back problems. We all know what back problems are a frequent "go-with." Yup. Stress. Maybe the old puff adder is a lot more uptight about his situation than BushCo would like to admit. Heh! Heh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm vaguely pessimistic about Rove.
I'd be delighted if he was indicted, but...

There's too much BS, unreliable characters and lack of interest in the media. And the media is the story here.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If Rove gets indicted, the media will be all over this.
At least for a day or two. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope---this story and case is dying,slowly,but it is dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't be so grumpy, Greg. It ain't dying yet. Watergate took a
big ol' pause until the trial got underway. Then it REALLY got good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike_The_Computer Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. No doubt they've already concocted a rationale for eventual full pardons.
Bush will never, ever let harm come to his co-conspirator and keeper of his secrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think a Rove indictment was just postponed.
by fancy, last-minute lawyering.

Now, I hope he's been practicing not to drop the soap cuz he's going go be squealing like a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree with your assessment
Fitzgerald is a straight shooter and felt he had to give them a chance to show their hand. If he didn't then they would scream that he was not fair. This way Fitz can say he looked at everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Still time to play the Rove Political Death Watch game.
go to this site
http://tomjoad.org/rovedeathwatch.htm

and submit your best guess as to when this quarter-ton of corrupt lard will be finished, politically speaking.

Amaze your friends with the power to predict the future.

Winner to be announced on DU.

I will probably have two winners: One being the person who guesses among all entrants, the second who came closest to guessing the correct date, and was submitted before October 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. They posted an update
Fitzgerald to brief grand jury Wednesday

Jason Leopold



Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald will present additional evidence to a grand jury Wednesday morning in the CIA leak case that could result in an indictment being handed up against White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, sources close to the investigation told RAW STORY.

Although the grand jury’s term expires in 18 months, Fitzgerald is expected to wrap up the case as it relates to Rove before the end of the year, the sources said.

Fitzgerald intends to present the grand jury with the sworn testimony from Rove’s attorney Robert Luskin, and Time magazine reporter Viveca Novak. The sources close to the case said Fitzgerald is still intent on seeking an indictment against Rove on at least one count of making false statements to FBI and Justice Department investigators when he was first interviewed in early October 2003 about his role in the leak.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_to_present_more_information_to_1213.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC