Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA Breaks Promises- Cities Stuck With Apt. Rental Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:06 PM
Original message
FEMA Breaks Promises- Cities Stuck With Apt. Rental Costs
The Philadelphia Inquirer ( www.phillynews.com/inquirer ) today had a front page article about how the City of Philadelphia may get stuck paying apartment rental costs for Katrina evacuees because FEMA is breaking an earlier promise to cities that they would reimburse one year of the cities' costs to rent apartments for evacuees.

The article said that the problem was much worse in Houston, which may get stuck paying for the remaining months on 24,000 apartment leases. I then found the following December 2, 2005 article about the problem in the Houston Chronicle.

Excerpt:

"FEMA squeezes city over apartment leases
The agency's demands could make Houston break promise to 100,000 exiles

Unless federal policy changes soon, Houston will find itself in an embarrassing position three months from today — breaking a key promise made to hurricane evacuees in their most desperate hour. Despite written statements to the contrary, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will cease honoring the 24,000 year-long leases, backed by the city, signed between hurricane evacuees and local apartment landlords.

As a result the city could fail to deliver on a promise made to nearly 100,000 storm-ravaged evacuees from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita — a safe roof over their heads for a year. Landlords, who are accepting tenants without a security deposit or credit checks, would be left with scores of families unable to pay their rent.

...The city paid the landlords directly, and then received reimbursement from FEMA....But then, last month FEMA announced a dramatic change — instead of reimbursing Houston for the 12-month leases, it would terminate the program on March 1."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Houston is a blue city..
Bill White is a Dem (who acts Independent, doing well).

Is the mayor of Philadelphia a Dem?

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Yes.
John Street, Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is Repulsive. FEMA is worthless. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. :Please stop saying that
That is exactly what the Republicans are counting on, people will blame bloated government agencies instead of Republican politicians. It is not FEMA, this never would have happened under a Democratic Administration's FEMA. This is Republicanism. And we need people in the south to draw that distinction most of all. If Democrats in red places don't start telling the truth to their friends and families, we'll be stuck with dumb ass Republicans forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Absolutely right - not FEMA, but Republican Government
Blame Grover Norquist for this, not the concept of FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. New Orleans is no longer a photo op. * will screw 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Could you please provide a direct link to the article? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The Houston Chronicle has the story here
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/3497624.html

FEMA squeezes city over apartment leases

Connected contractors get billions while everyone else gets screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. CNN said Fema billed Louisiana like 3 BILLION DOLLARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. They have no shame


Compassionate conservative -- The ultimate oxymoron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. The only plan was to get people out..and scatter them
The only way they could get cities to accept them was to promise them re-imbursement.. Once the people were relocated, the backpedaling began..

Anyone would be thankful to be saved, but once the initial fear has subsided, most people only want to reunite with family and friends, and find a way back home.. This will be denied them.. They have effectively been "relocated".

Surely there were some people in NOLA who were looking for a way out, and the relocation might have been a blessing in disguise for them, but most people are probably chomping at the bit to go home.. The rub is that the "new folks in charge", do not want them back.. For these people to return will be an exercise in futility..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC