Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

R Liberals vulnerable on the "wedge issue" separation of Church and State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:21 PM
Original message
R Liberals vulnerable on the "wedge issue" separation of Church and State
I think at least half of the GOP is not entusiastic about religion and especially about it getting mixed up in Government. I don't wish the government to be legislating on morality issues that originate from religion. I don't want religion taught in public schools or promoted in the public square. Religions are mostly very domineering and that goes against everything America stands for. Supposedly America stands for Freedom, personal freedom and not domination by some religious dogma. I think most Americans feel similar to me on this issue and we need to not back off it. It covers a lot of their supposed "wedge issues" as well. Their message of hating gays is based upon religion pretty much so is the abortion issue though not quite so much. We as a free people should not be dominated by religion and if that means attacking Christmas we should not run from it... I love Christmas but I don't want my government to force it upon people. I don't want my government forcing any religious idea or icon upon us. This is an important issue and they are pressing the envelope. Does anyone think we should and can push this successfully as a wedge issue? I have no concern with religion as a whole I just don't want it mixed up with government in any fashion....especially in establishing dogmatic laws..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not vulnerable at all, in my view. I think 'separation' is exactly...
Edited on Wed Dec-14-05 06:25 PM by Zenlitened
... how we ought to be framing the issue, in order win back control of the debate.

I hope most Americans would agree that they don't want to live under a kind of Taliban, no matter what religion the "god police" happen to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. liberals aren't vulnerable on any issue -- it's about
how we fight.

the language we use.

our authenticity in the eye and mind of the public.

we need{always} to do our marketing homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cite the constitution
and stand your ground I say. Vulnerability occurs only when ones tries to waffle or play both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think those who BELIEVE church and state
should NOT be separate would be very upset if it ever really happened. Unless THEIR version of religion dictated the rules, they would then be crying for separation!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. if you passed a law that REALLY separate church and state
in the US, like in some European countries, you'll probably have a civil war. Americans aren't ready for that. Besides the actual supreme court judges would probably find it "unconstitutional".

I just saw a movie on French TV about the 100 years anniversary of the French separation of Church and State (1905). It showed how divisive the question was and how extremists from both sides tried to use the situation to their advantage. The use of force was frequent, because the Church refused to be taxed. Fundies occupated churches and schools, attacking soldiers to become "martyrs". Things settled down, mostly because of WWI. But many European countries had to wait to 1946 for a FORMAL acceptance from the Vatican.

The only thing that can be done is a PROGRESSIVE removal of religious influence in ALL state affairs. For example removal of all indications towards religion, like the Presidential oath. Let the President swear on the constitution.

it's gona take 100 years and many, many Democrat presidents. Unless the fundies revolt and are suppressed by force. Europe was "dechristianised" by force to become democratic, remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC