Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what is the fundamental problem in spying?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:53 AM
Original message
So what is the fundamental problem in spying?
How do we solve the problem? Impeaching Bush? Throwing Rove in jail? Would that even be a good start?

The CIA, and other intelligence agencies, were created for the purpose of gathering intelligence on "foreign" countries and/or persons. If you have that as a foundation, what do you expect to happen?

Power expands, and that's all it does. Domestic spying has happened before, and it's still happening as we speak. Yes, "laws" were broken, but the people in power hardly care. I'm guessing they got more information in this round of spying, than they have in previous rounds. The next time they conduct such exercizes, and it will happen again(yeah, yeah, I know, laws...which stopped this administration from doing it this time), they'll get even deeper into total information awareness, with whatever new technology they dream up.

My solution to the problem would be to abolish the entire intelligence gathering(i.e. spy) infrastructure. Now I have no power, so I can say that. The people with actual power in Washington that could do that would never say such a thing. Therefore, the problem will not go away. As we should all know, in the past events of domestic spying, there was no Patriot Act, and there was no W, so those do not need to exist for spying on Americans to be conducted.

I hope everyone has time on their calendar for fighting this fight over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over again, like we do with every other problem. I know the American people are finally awake, but I'm sure they were awake the first time we found out about domestic spying years ago, or lying our country into war, or war profiteering, or hit sqauds in our sphere of influence, or this issue, and that issue, or blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. The real issue is not about spying.
This is about the President being above the law and ignoring our nations proud tradition of checks and balances for government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. TA DAAH!
That's it in a nutshell. ;)

But, I'd also include that, spying on the private lives of law-abiding American citizens by US Government employees is unconstitutional and fundamentally un-American.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nobody Is Above The Law. Nobody.
The Law Is The Same For All .Equals.

Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bow to King George
The royal pain in the ass.He should go to jail do not pass go do not collect 200,000 dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. All that Prez numb nuts had to do was show probable cause
Edited on Sun Dec-18-05 11:07 AM by rustydog
to a judge and a wiretap warrant would have been issued. Bush believes he is above the law. Fuck him.

The arguement is not spying, intelligence gathering or fighting terror. it is violating the Constitution that specifically bans spying on American citizens without following the due process of getting search warrants.
Only an incompetent who is completely unsure of his ability to succeed would want to change this good constitutional guarantee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tecelote Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Right.
He could not follow due process because that would mean he would have to divuldge the real reason for spying. Political gain. I doubt terrorists were the only targets.

That's why Congress is running scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You think that * has dirt on mbrs of Congress from this spying? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's a violation of the 4th admendment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC