Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something doesn't make sense about the NSA revelation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:18 PM
Original message
Something doesn't make sense about the NSA revelation.
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 03:26 PM by Jara sang
As per the UKUSA agreement the United States farms out it's signals intelligence gathering to other UKUSA countries, like Canada, Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand. It is illegal for U.S. intelligence organizations to spy on U.S. citizens but they were getting around that by getting other countries to do it for them then trading information. Why all of a sudden have the NSA do it directly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same reason NSA, and not FBI, did it?
Because it's a black op that in fact, didn't involve international communications and couldn't be entrusted to actual law enforcement agencies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obviously, because the targets were NOT people
covered by ECHELON, people who might actually be involved with terrorism or even organized crime. It's abundantly clear that Stupid insisted on bypassing ECHELON and a rubber stamp court because he wanted to spy on American citizens who had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or crime, like members of Congress, judges, Democratic party officials, and businessmen who had contributed to Democratic candidates, not to mention antiwar activists. This was one gigantic fishing expedition trying to dig up personal dirt on innocent people to use to blackmail them into silence.

How do I know this? Remember, I'm OLD. I lived through Nixon, and he did the same damned thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Parallels to Nixon are astounding, aren't they. Why didn't they learn? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because Nixon skated
They put a few easily ignored reforms into place then neglected to do anything that would enforce those reforms. All they needed was an arrogant and paranoid SOB in office who thinks he's above the law.

This time, we have to make sure the consequences are fully faced. A pardon after an impeachment or resignation won't do it. We've been paying the price of Nixon's pardon for many years now, and may continue to do so for many years in the future unless the primacy of law is reasserted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They did learn!!! Where do you think the likes of KKKRove were
trained?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Warpy gets a star! A golden star on this post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schmuls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Are you saying that if some info is gathered on someone, say by
their phone conversation, and the company had been outsourced, that the government could turn around and say it wasn't actually done by the U.S., kind of like the twisted logic that if we brought detainees overseas to have others do the torture, then it wasn't really done by us either?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is Negroponte still in charge? .... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. You expanded UKUSA out too much
The UKUSA Agreement is only between the US and Great Britain. The Brits have the exact same regulations we do under this Agreement, which means they have a law prohibiting spying on your allies.

Canada, Australia and New Zealand are in the Five Powers Agreement. This Agreement also requires regulations paralleling ours.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, the countries I mentioned are all part of the agreement.
The "A" in UKUSA stands for Australia, not "America".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. I love the line about how wiretapping could have prevented 9-11. But as I
recall, Bush picked up all his Bin Laden buddies and Saudi friends and flew them out of the country. That's a far cry from trying to listen in on their phone calls legally or illegally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC