Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's it called when you know a crime is going on and ignore it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:28 PM
Original message
What's it called when you know a crime is going on and ignore it?
Is there a law against not reporting a crime? Is there a case to be made against the NYT for holding this information for a year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Accessory n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conspiracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Willful compliance.
Actually, I believe "accessory" is the legal term.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Accomplice. Like B* and Dickface are (or worse) in the Plame Case,
among others. Interesting question about the NYT's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Accomplice is if you are involved, Accessory is if you allow/do nothing nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Freedom.
It has never been a part of our legal system that you are obligated to report people.

As a civil libertarian I dislike the idea that there should be any such obligation.

It amounts to deputizing the populace against their will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sort of
If they can prove you actually enabled it, then you get charged with Accessory.
If you merely witness it, you are right - no crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yup, accessory must have specific intent to aid and abet.
Mere failure to report is not a crime. Though old detective movies and cop movies all show the cop threatening to charge someone just for failing to squeal, thats not the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. How about "sociopathic?"
I do assume if you heard a woman scream "RAPE!" outside your apartment, you would not just turn up the television? You WOULD phone the police?

I would hate to think you capable of that level of indifference for a principle. We have agreed in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. "GOP business as usual". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Misprison Of A Felony, Sir
Misprison of Felony
In In re: Rafael Espinoza-Gonzalez, Int. Dec. 3402 (June 1999), the Board found "misprison of a felony" is not an offense relating to obstruction of justice. Pursuant to 18 USC § 4, misprison of a felony is defined as follows:

"Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civic or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years or both."

Elements of the crime of misprison of a felony are that the principal committed and completed the felony alleged and that the defendant, having full knowledge of that fact, failed to notify that authority and took an affirmative step to conceal the crime. The BIA noted its decision in Matter of Batista-Hernandez where it held that a conviction under 18 USC § 3 (accessory after the fact) constitutes a conviction for an aggravated felony because that section criminalizes actions knowingly taken to "hinder or prevent apprehension, trial or punishment." The BIA distinguished the two decisions, finding the federal crime of accessory after the fact in 18 USC § 3 requires an affirmative action knowingly undertaken to hinder or prevent another's apprehension, trial or punishment, and noting that nothing in section 4 references the specific purpose for which the concealment must be undertaken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. The House of Representatives? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't think one can bring charges against a governmental entity
The NYT, however, is not one. Just sayin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Only the leaders of each party in each chamber was notified
Pelosi, Delay, Reid, and Frist. The rest of the members were not notified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Oh, I was going for the laugh.
I was referring to the republican majority that rules the House these days. Hopefully not for long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Accesory after the fact. Aiding and abetting.
Lots of that going around these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovelaureng Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. A willing participant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Technically, it's known as misprision of felony
Section 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony
cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not
as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other
person in civil or military authority under the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both.


http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/1/sections/section_4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dereliction- not only a 'duty' of military or police-
but of the human-race.

From Mirrium Webster dictionary:

der·e·lic·tion ('der-ə-`lik-shən)
n.

1.
1. An intentional abandonment
2. A state of being abandoned
2. A recession of water leaving permanently dry land
3. An intentional or conscious neglect (dereliction of duty)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC