Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:12 PM
Original message
February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment
February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment
During the debate today over the House Republicans' bill about the Exclusionary Rule, the House Black Caucus introduced an amendment to the bill that the Republicans promptly voted down. The amendment turned out to be the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, verbatim. The House Republicans were "chagrined." The vote was 303-121, meaning that a number of Democrats joined the Republicans.

Here's the Fourth Amendment:
Amendment Article 4
Right of Search and Seizure Regulated.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

http://webusers.physics.umn.edu/~duvernoi/dem.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. ROTFL!! They sure don't know their constitution, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeRQ4U Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. This isn't funny at all.
It's disheartening and scary. Our country's laws are being made by people who haven't read the most important document in the history of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is a more apt explanation
Hold it, explanation? Sorry I don't have time for that just give it to me short and sweet thank you

:eyes: ------ insert any number of emoticons----

You are right this is a clear example of the fact that they don't read what they are voting on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very clever of the CBC.
And very telling. What more proof do we need that our House is in possession of those who have something in mind other than upholding the constitution of this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC