Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So we impeach and he refuses to resign. What happens next?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:01 PM
Original message
So we impeach and he refuses to resign. What happens next?
Clinton did not resign. How can we make him and Cheney leave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. impeachment and removal from office are two different things..
the house impeaches (indicts)
the senate removes from office (convicts)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. While DC is ignoring the rule of law
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 09:07 PM by C_U_L8R
why don't we just skip forward a few steps...
to the conviction and removal from office part.

kidding.... i wouldn't miss Bush's trial for anything !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't know what you're talking about. Clinton wasn't succesfully impeached
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 09:09 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
He was found not guilty in the Senate.

On Edit: To all those so petty to miss the point, blah blah yes, he was impeached in the house blah blah, but the second step of that process, the senate conviction, failed. The impeachment failed. Don't bore with with petty details when the context in relation to the OP is the same. It wasn't a choice by Clinton to not step down. The overall impeachment process failed and that is why. If the senate convicts they are gone, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He was impeached by the House, but not removed by the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Same Difference, and Part of the Overall Entire Impeachment Process
It was an unsuccessful impeachment. Not a choice by Clinton. You know what I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. No, I am NOT required to read minds. You need to be precise.
By you standards, then an indictment, even if found not guilty at trial, and a conviction are the same. They aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Sorry, But I Think That Is A Poor Analogy.
Though similar, the law does not deem that a trial has to occur no matter what.

Impeachment is a two step process, period. Yes, after the house is successful the person is considered "impeached", but to be a successful impeachment the second step of the "Impeachment Process" has to be successful.

To me it was petty semantics. My point was valid though maybe not as explicit as it should've been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. really? under what circumstances
does an indictment not lead to some sort of court action? Sure, the Prosecutor can refuse to bring the charges to court, but then the Senate can refuse to hold the trial, there is nothing in the Constitution mandating that it happen that way.

I suppose a court can throw out an indictment, and not an impeachment, but then that involves a mini trial, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InsanityInc Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #21
44. Bush will start a nuclear war before ever resigning
or being impeached, he cannot stand to lose and he cannot stand to be proven wrong. He will push the button before that ever happens !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes, he WAS impeached. You need to learn the definations.
Impeachment means the House finds reason for the Senate to try a POTUS. It has happen twice in US history. Both times the Senate failed to convict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Correct, he was impeached
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Only due to the sex stuff, not the investment deals
http://www.eagleton.rutgers.edu/e-gov/e-politicalarchive-Clintonimpeach.htm

Not guilty on the investment deals, which imho were far worse. He was actually impreached for lying about the sex deals. So, how many lies has Chimpy McPinoccio told?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. He will leave on Jan 20, 2009. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you convict them in the Senate, they must leave by law.
If they do not leave then, we are faced with the greatest constitutional crisis in modern times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justsayin Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton was impeach by the house
but not the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Only the House can impeach
Then it goes to trial in the Senate, and if they convict, the President can be removed. Clinton actually was impeached but was acquitted by the Senate which is why he finished out his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Nixon did not make it to the final stage because he resigned. Is
that correct? I was only a young pup back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. nixon was not impeached nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Nixon resigned before he got impeached
He would have been impeached and convicted most likely (as well as you can predict these things) if he had not resigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Yep.
He was persuaded to resign because the House would have proceeded with impeachment had he not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oingecat Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
43. Nixon
Why did Nixon leave, then? Was he convicted in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Think of Impeachment like a Grand Jury handing up an indictment
Only the House of Representatives plays the role of the Grand Jury. Instead of "indicting" they either "impeach" or not.

The 'trial' is held in the Senate. Think of the Senators as members of a regular jury in a criminal trial. They hear the evidence and decide whether or not the evidence warrants conviction of the crimes the president was impeached (think 'indicted') for.

Clinton was indeed impeached. The House found reason to believe a crime had been committed. The Senate held a trial on the charges in the impeachment and found the evidence lacking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawgHouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Wow, that's a really helpful explanation. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for all the info. I need to brush up on this stuff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bush_is_wacko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. See if you can get a copy of "Without Honor"...
The Impeachment of President Nixon and The Crimes of Camelot by Jerry Zeifman. It is out of print but sometimes you run across one on Amazon or even through used books at Barnes and Noble or Borders. It will take you through the whole mess.

Clinton was indeed impeached but since he was NOT convicted he didn't have to leave office. Nixon resigned before the impeachment process. He and his advisor's, who, I think, MADE him resign because of what they considered the fragile state of the American public at the time (an excuse not to let the public EVER know the extent of what he had done) knew he couldn't escape impeachment, conviction, and removal from office.

Removing Bush from office IMO is just impossible but convicting him of his crimes, also IMO is NOT impossible, after he leaves office and the Dem's take back OUR government.

I just don't think the Bush loyal family will EVER actually vote for impeachment, ergo no vote for conviction while Chimpy holds the crown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clinton was acquitted
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 09:11 PM by goodhue
Senate voted against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. "We" do not impeach.
At least not any "We" that I'm part of. Nor, as far as I know, any other member of DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. God I wish! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. sorry--i was erroneously referring to our elected officials. I need
to remove these g.d. rose colored glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe I'm reading more into this than you intend
but are you asking, what if he is impeached by the House and removed by the Senate and still refuses to leave? Because I've wondered that myself. He has already started building a mercenary army, loyal to him, and he has boodles of financial backing from corrupt corporations who would rather see him stay right where he is. Exactly who would walk in to the Oval office and grab him by the collar and remove him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. It is a scary thought. I never dreamed anyone would so blatently
make up the law like he does, so I don't know what to think anymore. Originally my question was regarding the actual process that happens after impeachment, but I also half wonder if he would try something like you described. I think in the end it would only happen if a powerful enough group of rich folks choose for it to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Several retired Generals might offer to do it
And a few veterans of various ages might be willing to follow their lead. With continued benefit cuts, too many have nothing to lose.

The neocons have NOT been good to the military. They have used (and spent) them as decoys while raiding the US Treasury for the corporate masters they serve. They attach legislation to military spending bills to force Congress to approve them or be attacked for 'starving the military' and being 'soft on defense'.

The neocons serve their corporate masters. Hell, I would help evict any neocon squatter who tried to stay after being impeached and convicted by the US Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. I would
If the Secret Service, the DC cops, and whoever the hell else is protecting him let me, I would go right in and tell Mr. *, to get the Hell Outta The People's House!

That is, of course, after he is impeached by both houses of congress and the cops wouldn't kick his ass out. I think the SS will get to him first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. If * is impeached and doesn't vacate, the GOP will be there to escort
his ass out. The GOP will not allow him to take down the entire party like that. Vacating isn't the problem. It's getting to impeachment hearings. I have no doubt if we get hearings, his ass is fried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
32. Lots of Marines with guns, pepper spray, and handcuffs.
This might be fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. Handcuffs dear, handcuffs
I'd love to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. Oh he will resign
...If it reaches the point where he loses the confidence of his own party and he is impeached by a large majority he's going to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. First the articles need to be brought up
and voted up.... then they get delivered to teh Senate where a trial is held... which incidentally found Clinton NOT Guilty, that is why he remained in power. If Bush if found guilty and he refuses to step down, we enter territory this nation has never been at... period. He is found guilty and steps down, it will still be unprecedented.

Read the Constitution, the legal map is there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I don't know...so many footprints on that "old piece of paper"
as of today...might be hard to read. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Then Cheney does not become pres. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. THROW THEM OUT ON THE LAWN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Bush is a coward. He will resign if he's scared.
They should try it. I don't know about Cheney, but he's rather ill and maybe won't fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. That old man would pound in your skull with a golf club
if you turned your back on him. Don't let that ill act fool you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC