Finding NEW powers for Pres? Where r the STRICT CONSTRUCTIONISTS??

And where in the Constitution does it say the document must be interpreted via "strict construction"? The words "strict construction" are found nowhere in the Constitution, negating the strict constructionists at their own game! D'oh!

:applause:

when he talked about activist judges ... they were the FISA judges!

Genius observation.

The Executive power mentioned in Article II Section 1, only means the power to execute the laws that have been passed by Congress nothing more. The President has NO powers not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution. Every branch has powers which are specifically enumerated in the document and all powers that are not enumerated to the Government are reserved to the People, not the government as explicitly stated in the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution:

Amendment IX - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In fact you need to call any "conservative" that makes the argument that the President has "magic" unenumerated powers on this because they are the ones who claim to be for small government and states rights. Now they are changing their tune because George has gone and confessed to a felony.

The enumerated powers of the President are listed in Article 2 section 2 as follows:
"Sect. 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other offices of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law. But the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers as they think proper in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions, which shall expire at the end of their next session."

No where in Article 2 Section 2 does it grant the President the magical power to ignore the separation of powers or the 4th Amendment or the right to break or ignore the law (which would be a violation of the separation of powers as well as illegal.) In fact it is the President's duty to enforce and execute the law, hence the title Chief Executive.

These enumerated Executive powers are relatively weak compared to those granted to Congress which authored the Constitution. The Legislative body granted itself far more extensive powers and if you have read the Federalist papers (particularly #69,#70) you would know that they were very much afraid of the President becoming a King and made comparisons in Federalist #69, and #70 as to how the President was intended to be much weaker than a King.

Doug D.
Orlando, FL

good post.