Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forget the pipe dreams about impeachment.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:31 AM
Original message
Forget the pipe dreams about impeachment.
I know it is fun to dream about * being thrown out on his ass. To think the American people will rise up in opposition to the GOP coup. But it ain't going to happen. The NSA crap has not made a difference in the polls. *'s numbers are creeping up after his Iraq speeches and the election. The Repugs still control the Government and will do so until at least '08.
I know we see a criminal organization running the country. Just don't expect enough of our fellow citizens to agree. It is too frightening for them to overturn a ruler like that. Even with a false war and a Pres. who has assumed dictatorial powers, they would rather avoid the turmoil an impeachment would bring.
Not only that, but I haven't noticed any big outcry from the Right. (Specter wants to have hearings, BFD!)
Remember this, they will hold onto power no matter what, and the people will let them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's the spirit!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Have some optimism, at least a little
Nixon's fall began with Congressional hearings, and they weren't impeachment hearings, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Nixon had a hostile DEMOCRATIC congress.
W had a friendly Republican congress. I hope you can understand the difference between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. I do understand the difference
And I can even use sharp instruments w/o hurting myself. :wtf:

I also understand that Congressional Repiglicans know they don't have any coattails from Bush at this point. He can't help them in '06. As such, they have to show some independence. I expect Arlen Specter's hearings to be quite interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
32. Optimism is a fine thing.
It should be well-tempered with realism, however.

One step at a time. Congress first. And we won't get it if we run on a platform of 'impeach the President'. Sounds to much like sore losers, or something, to the American voter. At least, this is my opinion of what will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. grrrrr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Until they are indicted
Fitzgerald. And besides, impeachment isn't based on polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Actually, you're wrong.
Impeachment is not a criminal justice matter, but a political one, entirely. but in order for the politics to work out, there has to be some type of criminal activity or gross incompetence.

No matter what Bush has done, or failed to do, he won't be impeached unless the political winds are blowing that way. Even then, it is doubtful that he will be convicted and removed from office. And, IMO anyway, it is also doubtful that he will ever face criminal charges, certainly not in the Hague. No President could afford to let such a precedent be set. And probably not in the American justice system, either. The powerful protect each other, even Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. How am I wrong?
An indictment will LEAD to an impeachment. I know it's political, but there has to be a crime. That's what I was getting at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burning Water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Impeachment will
not occur until the polls show that the public wants him impeached. This may be caused by an indictment, but something else might cause it, too. But even if indicted, he will not be impeached if the voters think he was justified in whatever way in his lawbreaking. That's why you can certainly expect to hear a ot about the national security in coming days. As someone once said, and as many Americans believe, "the Constitution is not a mutual suicide pact". So let them make a case for a compelling need that the sheeple will buy, and no impeachment, no matter how many righteous prosecutors look into indictable offenses. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. No, I won't forget it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. So you believe that the Congress won't be won by Dems in '06?
Because I do. I'm sorry you are so negative. People out here in the real world are getting pissed off and may just vote Democratic candidates in both the House and Senate this time around, thereby negating bush's power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Impossible for us to get a 2/3 Senate majority in 06.
And it takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate to vote for an impeachment conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. If They Still Control The Government Until '08 They Will Control.....
it afterwards into the next 8 years as well. This will happen because we didn't stop them now by '08 they will have changed everything in their favor and control the voting as well. We got to stop them by taking back the House, the Senate or both in '06. If that doesn't happen - it's all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. I so strongly disagree with your submission. If you have the ...
mistaken belief that cynicism is strength then enjoy a country where you can feel smug and have no democracy. Not for me brother, no way. Use this list to demand immediate impeachment proceedings. I will not lie down and cower. I will fight for the promise of my Democracy.


White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500
COMMENTS:202-456-1111 SWITCHBOARD:202-456-1414 FAX: 202-456-2461
http://www.whitehouse.gov /

President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov

Vice President Richard Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov

White House e-mail system becomes less user-friendly- CNN article, July18
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/07/18/nyt.markoff /


U.S. House of Representatives Home Page
http://www.house.gov /

U.S. House of Representatives - Other Government Sites
http://www.house.gov/govsites.html

Office of the Speaker
http://speakernews.house.gov /

Office of the Majority Leader
http://freedom.house.gov /

Office of the Minority Leader
http://democraticleader.house.gov /

House Majority Whip
http://majoritywhip.house.gov /

Democratic Whip
http://democraticwhip.house.gov /

House Republican Conference
http://hillsource.house.gov /

House Policy Committee
http://policy.house.gov /

House Select Committee on Homeland Defense
http://hsc.house.gov /

House Committee on Appropriations
http://www.house.gov/appropriations /

House Committee on Armed Services
http://www.house.gov/hasc /

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
http://intelligence.house.gov /

Home Page of the Senate of the United States
http://www.senate.gov /

Majority Leader Bill Frist
http://frist.senate.gov /

Assistant Majority Leader (Majority Whip), Mitch McConnell
http://mcconnell.senate.gov /

Minority Leader Tom Daschle
http://daschle.senate.gov /

Assistant Minority Leader Harry Reid
http://reid.senate.gov /

Democratic Policy Committee
http://www.senate.gov/~dpc /

Democratic Policy Committee Chairman, Thomas Daschle
http://www.senate.gov/~daschle /

Senate Republican Conference
http://www.senate.gov/~src /

Republican Policy Committee
http://www.senate.gov/~rpc /

Republican Policy Committee Chairman, Jon Kyl
http://kyl.senate.gov /

Richard B. Cheney (Vice President of the United States), President of the Senate
http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident /

Ted Stevens, President Pro Tempore
http://stevens.senate.gov /

~Write Your Representative
http://www.house.gov/writerep /

~Common Cause-fax your Congress
http://causenet.commoncause.org/afr/dbq/officials /

~D.C. Offices for Members of Congress, By State
http://www.failureisimpossible.com/contactcongress /

~Congressional Glossary
http://www.c-span.org/guide/congress/glossary/alphalist ...

~Congressional Record
http://thomas.loc.gov /

~Daily Digest
http://thomas.loc.gov /

~Roll Call Votes
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/v ... ....

~View the Active Legislation list
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/b_three_se ... ...

~Last Major Actions
http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bssQuery?&Db=108&stepID ... *&stepD=o&stepD1=20030521

~Bills Introduced
@eq+20030521" target="_blank">http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d108:FLD010 @eq+20030521

~This week in the House
http://www.majoritywhip.house.gov/whipnotice.asp

~Current House floor proceedings
http://clerkweb.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.php3

~Senate Calander of Buisness
http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/browse-sc.html

~Senate Priorities
http://democraticleader.house.gov /

~White House Press Briefings
http://www.usnewswire.com/search.html

~White House Gateway to Government
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/index.html

~Links to State Legislatures
http://www.fvap.gov

~State and Local Government Organizations
http://www.fvap.gov

~State by State Voting Instructions
http://www.fvap.gov

~Department of Navy Voting Page
http://www.persnet.navy.mil/nvap /

~Department of Air Force Voting Page
https://www.afpc.randolph.af.mil/votefund /

~U.S. Marine Corps Voting Page
https://lnweb1.manpower.usmc.mil/manpower/mi/mra_ofct.n ... ...

~DemocracyNet
http://www.dnet.org /

~Democratic National Committee
http://www.democrats.org /

~The League of Women Voters
http://www.lwv.org /

~Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.fvap.gov

~US Government
http://www.firstgov.gov /

~Thomas Government Info CenterThe Best source of government info
http://thomas.loc.gov /

~The Library of Congress
http://lcweb.loc.gov/homepage/lchp.html

~governmentguide.com
http://www.governmentguide.com /

~Federal Information Center
http://fic.info.gov /

~FedWorld
http://www.fedworld.gov /

~GPO Access
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/index.html

~Where to register to vote
http://www.rockthevote.org /

~Project Vote Smart
http://www.vote-smart.org /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peppin Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm with you Brother!!!
"I will not lie down and cower"

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. DUPE
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 10:37 AM by bpilgrim
do we need a new DU group :evilgrin:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, we should at least try to get rid of these criminals...
It could happen.

I watched Watergate closely and lived in DC at the time. It was great!

Sometimes these things get legs like you wouldn't believe.

I think the chimp has crossed the line with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. It was a different time for Nixon.
And a different Repug. Party. There are no independent Repugs in leadership positions. The hearings that took place under Nixon were in a Dem Congress.
I'm not trying to be pessimistic, just realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. How is what you are spouting real? re:realistic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Because I just don't see
mainstream America rallying against *. With all the talk here about impeachment and taking back the country you would think *'s poll numbers have plummeted below 30% after the NSA revelations. They haven't, he's back over 40%. And while most Americans don't agree with the non warranted wiretaps, they still buy into the "He's keeping us safe crap.
I think talk of impeachment, while fun, is unrealistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't expect impeachment soon--but I won't shut up.
Just getting out the news that Bush has committed impeachable offenses is lots of fun. And it might encourage the "frightened majority" to think for themselves. I'm sure the very idea unsettles his puppet-masters.

Of course, we can't do it until we have a Democratic majority in Congress. Let's remind people as the 2006 elections come up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. I feel your pain . . .
However, we cannot roll over now. What makes us who we are is that we believe in our country and that we will eventually prevail. No one thought that Nixon would be out on his ass either. What needs to happen now is that we keep the pressure on our representatives to REPRESENT US. Don't allow them to silence you, we need your voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Same pessimism was expressed about Watergate and Nixon
The public doesn't care, it isn't that big a deal, blah, blah, blah.

Two years later Nixon was gone.

Give it time friend, give it time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. isn't it the Dems DUTY to raise the issue of impeachment?
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 10:48 AM by Strawman
when the President is caught red handed illegally spying on Americans and breaking the law? The last president was impeached over a fucking lie in court about a blow job for Christ sakes!

Is this bizarro world?! We're supposed to forget about impeachment when this guy is illegally spying on anyone in this country that's to the left of Attila the Hun. The rule of law means nothing if this is just allowed to pass.

There are things that you do because you think they will be successful and there are things that you do out of obligation, just because they are right. This falls under the latter category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. I don't know where you come from
that you got this attitude. I live in a red state, but I keep on fighting, and will continue. I've called my congresspeople, and I'm ready to march, leaflet, and do whatever it takes to keep my country. I won't let the blood of my ancestors, who have fought for this country since the American Revolution, have been shed in vain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. Okay, I should explain,
I am not saying for us to shut up. I am not saying that we should not offer a strong and vigorous opposition. Hell, I'm not even saying we shouldn't call for impeachment. I am just saying that to really expect it to happen is a pipe dream.
I do think there needs to be voices to speak truth to power. The pendulum will swing back (unless they continue to steal elections!) But a I don't see America rising up to turn them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I am responding to the recent posts here
which say that now that we have clear evidence of criminal behavior (he even admitted it) when will impeachment begin? It won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. Oh BULLSHIT!
You piss the American people off enough and you're out on your ass! We've had it with Bush. Every Republican I know was sick of his crap, because of Iraq, BEFORE they heard about this latest fiasco. That disapproval has now turned to anger.

I, for one, am not going to throw my hands up in despair, and just give up. I'm going to fight. At least, that way, even if we don't win, we know we at least tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
26. I would do it just to take up Bush's time.
And that of his new Chief Justice. To get all testimony on the record. To put the President on notice. To form the basis of a possible prosecution in '09.

There are all kinds of reasons to pass articles of impeachment that have nothing to do with actually removing the President from office. House GoOPers knew that in '98. What goes around comes around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. I will tell you what I told the last poster who said the same thing...
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 11:08 AM by Heaven and Earth
The question is not "Can he be impeached", it's "SHOULD he be impeached?" If the answer is yes, then working for impeachment is the right thing to do.

If the laws of this country mean anything other than whatever is politically expedient at the moment, then working for impeachment is the right thing to do. If the common man is suspected of murder or embezzlement or stalking or whatever, there is no need of a political movement to have him arrested, it just happens. The same rules ought to apply to the government, but they don't. So we work to enforce them.

Also, who said anything about "dreaming of impeachment"? We are talking about WORKING for impeachment. It would be good if you worked with us, if you haven't already written to the editor and called your congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
28. And just to illustrate my point,
read the letters in the NYT about the NSA wiretaps.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/opinion/l20spy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. I saw two that supported the wiretapping
the rest did not. Hardly a clear indication that the american people are ready to accept a king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
29. Should we just "Get over it" as well?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
30. The 'pipe dream' should be inspiration to get more democrats elected
It's my rallying cry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
34. Nixon was impeached for exactly the same things this guy's done
And Bush has even admitted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. That's completely true.
It's not a question of whether he should be impeached. it's a realistic look at the chances of that happening. It is such a different environment today from that of Nixon. The GOP simply won't allow it to go forward.
I want to remind everyone of their overblown optimism last year when Kerry trounced Junior in three debates. Surely the American people saw we were being lead by a moron. It didn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. one word
DIEBOLD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. What kind of odds do you think MLK Jr. was up against?


What kind of odds do you think MLK was up against?

It is a good thing for humanity he didn't listen to people telling him, "it will never happen".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. Will Pitt said the same thing
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 02:27 PM by BelgianMadCow
I didn't agree with it either. I believe in the power of people, and people in action. I have seldom seen DU so energized in the past 4 years. When the silent majority finds their voice, the political players will have to listen. They will maybe only do it to protect theri position, but they will listen.

And I think the psyche of the average American is in a dire enough strait to make for a very fertile ground for revolution. The subcutaneous anger only needs to be channeled.

The dems and DU can do that.

There is a marked difference in the tone of responses to your post and Will's though.



edit for typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC