Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Putting it all in perspective --> PNAC 101 - RISE OF THE NEOCONS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:16 PM
Original message
Putting it all in perspective --> PNAC 101 - RISE OF THE NEOCONS
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 02:17 PM by LunaC

It's time again to bring the lurkers and newbies up to speed and put recent events in their proper perspective.



George W. Bush constantly reminds the nation about the threat of terrorism that began with 911 but he leaves out a few important details that you should know.........

June 1997 - The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) was born. Populated by influential Movers of industry and Shakers of public opinion, the PNAC is an organization united in the vision for a global U.S. empire - "Pax Americana" - through coercion and military domination. Their philosophy can be simply summarized:

  • There are countries to plunder and fortunes to be made. You have it, we want it. Do as we say or suffer the consequences.

  • The U.S. already has a powerful military but we plan to nurture and grow it until it's massive and we are indominable. Resistance is futile. We are.......


Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Steve Forbes, William J. Bennett, Frank Gaffney, and I. Lewis ("Scooter") Libby, signator's - among others - of the PNAC's "Statement of Principles".

"We need to...challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values."

"We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future."

"It is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge."
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm


JANUARY 1998 - The PNAC knew that he who owns the oil also owns the world so they sent a letter to President Clinton urging him to attack Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power since he put "a significant portion of the world's supply of oil at hazard". Clinton didn't grant them their wish and the PNAC was disheartened that they couldn't manipulate the military while outside of the White House power structure.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm


MARCH - APRIL 1999 - In an effort to capture and control the castle and all its warriors and weapons, the PNAC offered up members Steve Forbes, Dan Quayle and Gary Bauer to run as Republican candidates in the upcoming Presidential election.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/election/profile.htm


JUNE 1999 - Ever persistent and determined to maximize their potential for success in the Presidential campaign, the PNAC exercised their power of nepotism and member-Jeb Bush's brother George stepped up to the plate to join the race.


SPRING 2000 - The PNAC may have felt confident with their candidate's chances for winning the White House but they were absolutely smug over what they saw as a possible Fallback Plan...electronic voting machines with severe security flaws that included hidden backdoors, erasable audit trails and multiple vote totals with the potential to propel vote tampering to new heights through the magic of remote access.

How To Rig An Election In The United States
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0307/S00065.htm

Can the votes be changed?
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/access-diebold.htm

GAO Report Finds Flaws in Electronic Voting
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/102105Q.shtml

Bettter yet, Chuck Hagel - a fellow Republican loyalist - owned the ES&S voting machine company that counted 60% of all U.S. votes. He had already won one election and was part of the U.S. Senate power team in Washington.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0301/S00166.htm

Assured that the White House would soon be theirs, the PNAC debuted their 76-page blueprint to achieve world domination. "Rebuilding America's Defenses" became the PNAC's manifesto, detailing the ideal level of military power to specifically eliminate the hostile regimes of Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea and it endorsed pre-emptive strikes against them, tradition be damned. Iraq was given star billing as Control Central for their Mideast base of operations.

"At present the United States faces no global rival. America’s grand strategy should aim to preserve and extend this advantageous position as far into the future as possible."

"American landpower is the essential link in the chain that translates U.S. military supremacy into American geopolitical preeminence.

"We cannot allow North Korea, Iran, Iraq or similar states to undermine American leadership."

"While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

What is particularly foreboding and chilling in view of events to later unfold, is this statement bemoaning the lengthy process of rebuilding the existing U.S. military according to the heightened standards and specifications the PNAC aspired to.

"...the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."
http://cryptome.org/rad.htm


NOVEMBER 2000 - Saddam may have sensed an ill wind in the air when he made the first strike, turned his back on the U.S. Dollar and accepted only Euros as payment for his oil. This had the potential of seriously destabilizing the U.S. economy and the PNAC considered this an hostile act of aggression towards their personal and business interests. The heat was on for them to make their first move.

http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2000/11/01112000160846.asp


DECEMBER 2000 - In a highly contentious Presidential vote battle on the home turf of PNAC-Jeb Bush, the Supreme Court decided that George Bush was the new President.

Bush now had the green light to seamlessly merge members of the PNAC into his Administration with no one the wiser. PNAC members elevated to the Bush hierarchy include, among others:


  • Donald Rumsfeld - Secretary of Defense

  • Paul Wolfowitz - Deputy Secretary of Defense

  • Elliott Abrams - Member of the National Security Council

  • John Bolton - Undersecretary for Arms Control and InternationalSecurity

  • Richard Perle - Chairman of the advisory Defense Policy Board

  • Richard Armitage - Deputy Secretary of State

  • John Bolton - Undersecretary of State for Disarmament

  • Zalmay Khalilzad - White House liaison to the Iraqi opposition


An Honorable Mention was awarded to Condoleezza Rice - National Security Advisor - who is a former oil-company consultant having been on the board of directors of Chevron as its main expert on Kazakhstan.

The PNAC agenda had now passed "Go". The most powerful military machine in the world stood at their ready and Saddam was in the crosshair.

Wasting no time, Cheney secretly assembled an advisory panel of oil and gas executives from Enron, Dynergy, Shell Oil, Chevron/Texaco and British Petroleum under the direction of James Baker (former Secretary of State under George Bush Sr.) to help shape our national energy policy and justify the PNAC's anticipated war with Iraq.

Contributing substantially to the task force discussions and recommendations was a shadowy group of unidentified observers who still remain unknown. Sheikh Saud Al Nasser Al Sabah, the former Kuwaiti oil minister, also made a contribution to the group's final report which was funded through Khalid Al-Turki (a Saudi Arabian oil and gas enterprise) and the Arthur Ross Foundation (a non-profit organization that - on the surface - appears to be a supporter of the Arts.)

http://www.yuricareport.com/PoliticalAnalysis/FraudinWhiteHouse.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111501842.html


MARCH 2001 - Cheney closely guarded the details surrounding his energy task force but documents released through the Freedom of Information Act reveal a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as 2 charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml

As one internet poster pointed out:

"The Iraq map is not a map, it's a plan

"There are several areas marked 'earmarked for production sharing' (look at the map legend), which means privatized oil fields. Iraq did not have privatized oil fields and production sharing agreements before the US took it over.

"There are also parcels marked on the Iraq oil field and exploration map (numbered 'Block 1' through '9'). Iraq did not have an active, privatized oil exploration program going on before it was conquered by the US.

"If you read the footnotes and entire contents of the other documents, there is a heavy emphasis on business concerns, such as contracts and vendors over items one might think would be more important in a government discussion, such as capacity, long term reserves, etc.

"One footnote (in UAEOilProj.pdf) even contains investment advice for the participants at the meeting, suggesting opportunities in downstream projects, such as power desalination and pipeline projects.

"These are not 'just maps'. Read them."

It can be argued that the spoils of war were being doled out two years before Iraq once again became a household word. Perhaps this explains why Cheney worked so hard and so long to keep this information suppressed until Iraq was under U.S. military control...by then it would be too late for the public to object to the invasion.

Not by coincidence, the United States Agency for International Development (USAid) began coordinating infrastructure and engineering contracts to rebuild post-war Iraq. Halliburton, where Cheney formerly served as chief executive, acquired the contract to oversee firefighting operations at Iraqi oilfields.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2837657.stm


Iraq, circa March 2001, painted a completely different picture than the Evil Empire the Bush Administrations tried to portray in their determined rush to war.

"Iraq was one of the more progressive Islamic countries in the region. It provided full rights for women and public education for its citizens who enjoyed a decent standard of living."

"Despite the years of bombings and the even greater toll on human life taken by the sanctions, visitors to Baghdad don't see a city in ruins. Much of the wreckage has been cleared away, much has been repaired.

"In our hotel, there's running water throughout the day, hot water in the morning. Various streets in Baghdad are lined with little stores, surprisingly well-stocked with household appliances, hardware goods, furniture, and clothes (much of which has a second-hand look).

"We see no derelicts or homeless people on the streets, no prostitutes or ragged bands of abandoned children, though there are occasional youngsters eager to shine shoes or solicit spare change. But even they seem to be well-fed and decently clothed. ......large swaths of the city used to be shrouded in complete darkness; today, there are lights just about everywhere.

"People used to feel hopelessly isolated and now there seems to be more hope and better morale.


Sadly though, "more and more children are turning up with leukemia" (a result of the tons of depleted uranium the U.S. military used and left behind after Gulf War I.)

"The Iraqi leadership could turn US policy completely around by uttering just two magic words: "free market." All they have to do is invite the international Monetary Fund and World Bank into Iraq, eliminate free education and free medical care, abolish the minimal food ration that goes to every Iraqi, abolish the housing and transportation subsidies, and hand over the country's oil industry to the corporate cartels. To lift the sanctions, Iraq must surrender to the tender mercies of the free-market paradise....

"Until then, Iraq will continue to be designated a "rogue nation" by those policy makers in Washington who themselves are the meanest profit-driven, power-mongering rogues on earth."
http://www.michaelparenti.org/DefyingSanctions.html

The issue of trade sanctions against Iraq put the Bush Administration in a bind - the sanctions had been designed to punish Saddam for not conceding to U.S. demands but it ended up handicapping U.S. corporations and undermining the PNAC's drive for U.S. economic supremacy. The Bush Administration was on a tight four year schedule to oust Saddam and launch the PNAC's Grand Plan for World Domination but they still didn't have a viable script to sell to the public. Yet.

"It is important to shape circumstances...... ." - PNAC Statement of Principles

May 2001 - The U.S. State Department met with Iran, German and Italian officials to discuss Afghanistan. It was decided that the ruling Taliban would be toppled and a "broad-based government" would control the country so a gas pipeline could be built there.

http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/7969.pdf.
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex20867.htm


Even as plans were being made to remove the Taliban rulers from power, Colin Powell announced a $43 million "gift" to Afghanistan.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-091701scheer.column
http://www.cato.org/dailys/08-02-02.html


Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in the UAE received a call that Bin Laden supporters were in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives. It was rumored that Bin Laden was interested in hijacking U.S. aircraft.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/images/04/10/whitehouse.pdf


June 2001 The decades-old procedure for a quick response by the nation’s air defense was changed. NORAD’s military commanders could no longer issue the command to launch fighter jets because approval had to be sought from the civilian Defense Secretary and PNAC-member, Donald Rumsfeld.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing7/for_the_record_ashley.pdf


July 2001 The private plot formulated in May for toppling the Taliban was divulged during the G8 summit in Genoa, Italy. Immediately after the conference, American, Russian, German and Pakistani officials secretly met in Berlin to finalize the strategy for military strikes against the Taliban, scheduled to begin before mid-October 2001.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1550366.stm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,556254,00.html
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex20867.htm


September 2001 - The "catastrophic and catalyzing" modern-day Pearl Harbor envisioned years earlier by the PNAC came to pass when the WTC and Pentagon were attacked as Rumsfeld sat passive and unresponsive. The finger of blame was pointed at Osama bin Laden, a former CIA operative with ties to Afghanistan. Suddenly, the U.S. "gift" of $43 million to the Taliban in May was cast in a new light. Coincidentally, Pakistan had participated in the plan to attack Afghanistan and the chief of Pakistan's Inter Service Intelligence (ISI) agency was later linked to a 911 hijacker after wiring him $100,00 just days before the WTC fell. Pakistan's ISI also had a long-standing working relationship with the CIA.

http://cryptome.org/rad.htm
http://www.observer.com/pages/story.asp?ID=8830
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=1454238160
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1266317,00.html

The PNAC had scored a home run with the bases loaded with the 911 event: shock, horror and fear gripped the nation, the war on "terrorism" had been established in no uncertain terms, attacking Afghanistan with public approval was a foregone conclusion and the stage was set for building a public case against Saddam.

Not one to let a good attack go to waste, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld sprung into action.


  • He told his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq, even though Saddam wasn't linked to the attacks.

  • PNAC-James Woolsey, former CIA director, was dispatched to London to look for and 'firm up' evidence of Iraqi involvement in the 911 attacks.

  • PNAC-member and Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz was authorized to create the Office of Special Plans.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/04/september11/main520830.shtml


"It is important to shape circumstances..........."- PNAC Statement of Principles

The Office of Special Plans (OSP) was a secret group of analysts and policy advisors with no status in the intelligence community. Nevertheless they reported directly to the White House and National Security office with cherry-picked intelligence from questionable sources to support the case for invading Iraq. The OSP circumvented formal, well-established oversight procedures, ignored intelligence that didn't further their agenda, expanded the intelligence on weapons beyond what was justified and over-emphasized the national security risk. They became more influential than the C.I.A. or the Defense Intelligence Agency who didn't even know the ultra-secret OSP existed for at least a year.

Because they were based in the Pentagon, it was assumed that the OSP was an intelligence-gathering agency that was second-guessing the C.I.A. but in actuality it was the White House Military Marketing Machine charged with the task of writing the PNAC's "Get Saddam" sales pitch for the public. Shading and bending reality to suit their own purpose, it wasn't important for the OSP's stories about Saddam to be factual, only that the average American believed them to be - in true Hollywood fashion.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030512fa_fact

While the nation was stripped to the emotional bone and painfully vulnerable, the White House capitalized on the opportunity to reshape public perceptions and responses to conform with the PNAC's new American agenda. Rather than buoy the "can do" American spirit with optimism and hope for the future as Presidents before him had done in times of crisis, Bush spoke with an alarmist and pessimistic tone that served to perpetuate the high anxiety, excitability and fear in the populace.

To hear him speak, the world was a dark, evil and dangerous place....terrorism was here to stay....it would be a long struggle....America was helpless without the military might of the Government to keep the nation safe. The intent was to create a psychologically broken, weary and docile populace that would be easier to lead into war.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/130534_focusecond13.html

Fear became the Administration's strategic tactic for reprogramming the public into accepting the PNAC's militaristic designs. Still shell-shocked and exhausted from the enormity of the WTC and Pentagon tragedies, the public's panic shifted into frenzied over-drive when anthrax-laced envelopes arrived in government and media offices, killing five people. A perpetrator was never identified but the investigation eventually centered around the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, one of the nation's main anthrax research centers.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,126244,00.html

Using classic "operant learning" techniques from the realm of consumer psychology, the public was purposely kept on High Alert and continually "shaped" with ominous sound bites on the nightly news and "Level Orange Terror Alerts" at regularly scheduled but discrete intervals.

http://www.consumerpsychologist.com/#Perception


October 2001 - With flags waving, crowds cheering, and anthems playing, the "War On Terror" and the hunt for Osama began when Afghanistan was attacked right on schedule of July's secret meeting.

Immediately afterwards the PNAC and White House collaboration of "GET SADDAM" played relentlessly on televisions and in newspapers across the nation and the World as the "War on Terror" waged on and the litany of lies began.


The only terrorists we have to fear are those that occupy the White House.



Pass It On

This has been a presentation of The Whispering Campaign - an opportunity to become ACTIVELY involved in educating the American public without drawing attention to yourself. This is a game of Political "Gossip" where the story of our Government's deception and betrayal gets passed from one person to another.

Anyone can play. The rules are simple: make ten copies of this timeline and leave it in a public place where someone else will find it and read it. Ideal locations for maximum exposure include book stores, copy shops, libraries and train stations. Buses, taxis, laundromats, and check-out lines at the grocery store. Hair salons, rest rooms, gas stations and convenience stores. Anywhere you happen to be will work just fine. The American public deserves to know the TRUTH!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone should know about this..
I'd say the vast majority of Americans have never even heard of PNAC, let alone who their members are and what their objective is. I think it's vital that we get the word out about these thugs.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Doin' my best - here's how you can help....
Repost this on other discussion groups you may frequent and/or get other websites to host the full piece for reference.

Thanks for your interest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. the Leo Strauss/UChicago connection
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 02:41 PM by dusmcj
a short note about the philosophical underpinnings of PNAC:

several PNAC adherents, for example Wolfowitz, were students at the University of Chicago and were strongly influenced by the philosophy of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish emigre who escaped the Nazis in 1938 and taught there after the war. (A side note is that UChi was established by David Rockfeller at the end of the 1800's using his oil money, at a time when exalted captains of industry were not yet viewed with suspicion.) The experience of the Holocaust, including his own loss of many family members, strongly influenced the formation of Strauss' personal philosophical direction, so that he combined his original classicist (Platonian ? Sorry, I'm iggerant of the classic philosophical schools here) training involving the Athenian notion of a superior (because more supportive and generative of more culturally and ethically evolved human beings) society with a here-and-now observation that a society which is superior to others has an obligation to ensure that its culture not only survive, but replace other comparatively deficient ones. This obligation implies that such a leadership grouping has the right to use whatever means necessary, including those traditionally frowned upon and ascribed to the deficient opposition such as lying and other subterfuge, in order to ensure the higher culture's success. Further, that the optimal structural organization for such a society is that a leadership elite operate in secret and keep its mass public ignorant of its activities; it acts in their interest, shaping the culture as patricians for their own good.

The PNAC adherents have taken this and updated it to answer the question of how America should position itself in the 21st century with its advantages (last superpower, rich, democratic, "free")and limitations (5% of world pop, resource overconsumer, high defence costs, neutered but recalcitrant political opposition, etc.). We can see the parallels between the administration's proclamations that whatever they do is OK, and the Straussian notion that anything goes in defence of a culture we "know" is "better".

Disclaim: this is my own summation of information I've gathered from publicly available sources online and in other media. I believe it is an accurate representation of facts and espoused positions. Note that the New Yorker magazine's archive of articles on Iraq is a truly extraordinary information resource for this issue; they are doing a service to the nation with their reportage and information presentation. Web searching on "Leo Strauss Chicago" or similar strings will bring forth a wealth of information as well.

You're doing a service with this information; I'd suggest that it should be moved to or duplicated in the research forum as a live document if there isn't one there already, or integrated with any that does already exist there. Then you can periodically post a link to it for new readers.

Onwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. One step ahead of you
It‘s already in the Research forum and also in Demopedias but sometimes newbies/lurkers won’t click a blind link and are more likely to read what’s right in front of them.

Thanks for providing the additional background info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The use of whatever means necessary constitutes dictatorship,...
,...not only at home but also globally.

They are anti-democratic, anti-democracy ideologues and should not be in leadership positions here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. More info on Strauss, the Necons and Dominionism


From the article "The Despoiling of America" at www.Yuricareport.com


Strauss’s teaching incorporated much of Machiavelli’s. Significantly, his philosophy is unfriendly to democracy—even antagonistic. At the same time Strauss upheld the necessity for a national religion not because he favored religious practices, but because religion in his view is necessary in order to control the population. Since neo-conservatives influenced by Strauss are in control of the Bush administration, I have prepared a brief list that shows the radical unchristian basis of neo-conservatism. I am indebted to Shadia Drury’s book (Leo Strauss and the American Right) and published interviews for the following:

First: Strauss believed that a leader had to perpetually deceive the citizens he ruled.

Secondly: Those who lead must understand there is no morality, there is only the right of the superior to rule the inferior.

Thirdly: According to Drury, Religion “is the glue that holds society together.”<40> It is a handle by which the ruler can manipulate the masses. Any religion will do. Strauss is indifferent to them all.

Fourthly: “Secular society…is the worst possible thing,” because it leads to individualism, liberalism, and relativism, all of which encourage dissent and rebellion. As Drury sums it up: “You want a crowd that you can manipulate like putty.”<41>

Fifthly: “Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat; and following Machiavelli, he maintains that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured.”<42>

Sixthly: “In Strauss’s view, the trouble with liberal society is that it dispenses with noble lies and pious frauds. It tries to found society on secular rational foundations.”

http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/TheDespoilingOfAmerica.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick, for your own good. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Easiest way to learn about PNAC: "The Power of Nightmares" video
Scroll down this page until you get to the picture of Osama --
<http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/video_september11.htm>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thanks for that link n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. self-serving kickedly-doo-dah
Damn, things are fallin' off the main page faster than usual!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-24-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good post...kick.
Everyone should read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks, LunaC! Rember CIA scrubbed Scoop Jackson records?
The neo-cons from University of Rockefeller-Chicago had a friend in the heart of the military industrial complex, Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a hawkish Democrat who I believe would be first in line to call for impeaching these bed-wetting Bush bastards who ransacked the records to make it harder to discover the close connections as well as figure out these PNAC turds' actual plans.



CIA seizes Sen. Jackson papers

by Lara Bain
Herald Writer

SEATTLE - Five federal government officials, including three from the CIA, have removed several documents from the archival papers of the late Sen. Henry M. "Scoop" Jackson housed at the University of Washington.

Last week the federal document security team spent three days in the special collections division of the UW Suzzallo-Allen library. The officials, which also included people from the Department of Defense and Department of Energy, combed through 1,200 boxes of material using a five-binder index to find the targeted papers.

Carla Rickerson, head of special collections, said the team removed up to 10 documents.

She would not disclose the exact number or subject matter of the documents because of the university's privacy policies.

Rickerson said the papers, now considered classified, are being held in a secure location on campus until federal authorities declassify them.

The majority of the Jackson papers span his years in Congress, the period of 1940 to 1983. A portion are drawn from his pre-congressional years when he worked as a private attorney in Everett and as the Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney.

Jackson was born in Everett and earned his lifelong nickname "Scoop" as a paper boy for The Everett Daily Herald.

CONTINUED...

http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/05/02/15/100loc_jackson001.cfm

More at...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4535175&sourceCode=RSS



PS: Sorry for the run-on sentence. It's just that Porter Goss never sleeps.

Most important: Happy Holidays, LunaC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. What in the hell are they hiding now?
I didn’t know anything about ”Scoop”J ackson until you brought him to my attention. Rooting around on Google I’m blown away to discover that he was the father of the DLC, that Wolfowitz, Perle and Gaffney come from his office and that Rumsfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Abramowitz, Carlucci were part of the Balkan Action Committee which brought us the war against Yugoslavia just because the Caspian region has the world's largest untapped oil reserves. These bastards have been fucking up the world in the pursuit of oil for a long time!

So what tracks were they trying to cover by raiding Jackson’s library? If only we knew……DAMN.

Thanks for the background info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. WMD
Seeing how there's a lot of interest on the part of the Bush Crime Family in gumming up America's ability to stop the spread of nukes (outing Valerie Plame and Brewster Jennings & Assoc.; ignoring Pakistani father of the Islamic H-Bomb Dr. A.Q. Khan; protecting BCCI connections... I guess WMDs are why they're so interested in hiding some connections somewhere.



Why are the feds probing long-dead "Scoop" Jackson?

EXCERPT...

"Scoop" Jackson was a Democratic "Cold Warrior" in Hubert H. Humphrey mode who twice ran unsuccessfully for president and who was a major player in American foreign policy during the 1960s and 1970s. He died in 1983 -- or more than two decades ago.

The federal team apparently found what it was looking for, after culling through some 1,200 boxes of Jackson's papers over several days. A library official (who's probably in a heap o' trouble right now for spilling the beans) said that 10 documents were removed and classified as top secret.

The paper doesn't know what the feds were looking for, and neither do we. Given the make-up of the team, including a DOE official, it's always possible there was concern about information related to nuclear weapons (the Hanford nuclear site is in Jackson's home state) getting in the hands of terrorists.

OR, this could be connected to the hottest under-the-radar story inside the Beltway right now, an FBI probe over whether insiders were passing policy secrets regarding Iran to the D.C.-based American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC. A Pentagon official named Larry Franklin has been targeted in the probe, but many suspect the investigation goes much deeper into the neo-con movement. Franklin worked for another Pentagon neo-con, Douglas Feith, who was the No. 3 official in the Defense Department but surprised many by abruptly quitting "to spend more time with his family."

Where does "Scoop" Jackson come in? Feith's mentor was former Pentagon official and influential conservative policy advisor Richard Perle. And from 1969 to 1980 Perle was a member of Jackson's staff and at times his most influential advisor, dubbed by some "the Prince of Darkness" during that era. Perle is so close to the Jackson legacy that he remains a member of the Henry M. Jackson Foundation that the senator established.

CONTINUED...

http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/archives/001462.html



These guys are something else -- patriots or traitors, or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. CHEMICAL and BIOLOGICAL WMD's!
Edited on Sun Dec-25-05 06:05 PM by LunaC
I goggled "Scoop" Jackson and DOE out of curiosity. Now follow the bouncing ball….


Contract for Hanord Laboratories puts Pacific Northwest Laboratory on the Map

On April 27, 1964, Battelle submitted a proposal to the Atomic Energy Commission to run the Hanford Laboratories….Thirty days after submitting the proposal, Battelle was awarded the contract. Senators Henry "Scoop" Jackson and Warren Magnuson announced the news in the Tri-City Herald the next day.



Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), is one of nine U.S. Department of Energy multiprogram national laboratories.


http://www.tridec.org/index.cfm?regid=%23%2F0%2C%28%0A&fwnavid=%23%2F0%24%2B%0A&navMode=%28%3FT%3D%3A%28Y%3EJ%3B1%5C%20%0A
==========================

Today, Battelle Memorial Institute runs the Chemical and Biological Defense Information Analysis Center (CBIAC).

http://www.battelle.org/solutions/fall04/SpecialReport.stm
====================================

The CBIAC is supported by Horne Engineering Services, Inc., Innovative Emergency Management, Inc., MTS Technologies, Inc., QuickSilver Analytics, Inc., and SciTech, Inc., is a full service Department of Defense (DoD) Information Analysis Center (IAC) under contract to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E) and administratively managed by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) under the DoD IAC Program Office (Contract No.SPO700-00-D-3180). The CBIAC serves as the focal point for DoD Chemical and Biological Defense (CBD) scientific and technical information. It provides services to DoD organizations, other government groups, and their approved contractors. Service to other parties is limited to the publicly accessible information on this web site.

http://www.cbiac.apgea.army.mil/
==========================================

Horne Engineering works with Bechtel National, Inc., and the Department of Defense dealing with “lethal legacies of twentieth century warfare”. Services include - Chemical/biological/radiological/explosive detection and decontamination

http://www.horne.com/company/index.html
==========================================

Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.- Client - United States Army Chemical Materials Agency (formerly the Soldier and Biological Chemical Command)

http://www.ieminc.com/About/fed_clients.htm
==========================================

QuickSilver Analytics, Inc., - Services - Worldwide On-Site Sampling and Analysis for Chemical Warfare Materials (CWM)

http://www.chembiokits.com/laboratory_services.html
==========================================
SciTech, Inc. - “The forte of the company is its expertise in chemical weapons and chemical agents, including, data collection, data management, monitoring and demilitarization operations.” Client: U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (MRICD)

http://www.scitechinc.com/about.htm
==========================================

Now get this (and remember those anthrax attacks of 2001)……

The U.S. anthrax project (is) run by the nonprofit Battelle Memorial Institute in Columbus, Ohio. Considered the DIA's and the CIA's favorite nonprofit contractor, Battelle has been involved, according to the New York Times and the Columbus Dispatch, with manufacturing the infamous trillion spores per gram Ames (as in Iowa) silica-impregnated anthrax. Officially, the work is done for "defensive" purposes in order to produce a vaccine.

Battelle was in partnership with BioPort of Lansing, Michigan in officially producing the anthrax vaccine for the United States.


http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/10/326234.shtml

====================

Man, oh man, look at how those dots connect!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. The PNAC and DLC connection originates with "Scoop"
The PNAC and DLC share the same origin

Current PNAC members were proteges of Henry ('Scoop”) Jackson and Daniel Patrick (“Pat”) Moynihan


“…look at the 1970s, when the neo-conservatives in the Democratic Party grouped themselves into the Coalition for a Democratic Majority (CDM). The CDM's two leading lights in Congress were the Democratic Senators Henry "Scoop" Jackson and Patrick Moynihan. The Cold Warrior and fanatically pro-Israel Jackson remains the model for the DLC crowd today. The DLC's former President, Sen. Joe Lieberman declares he is proud to be identified as a " 'Scoop' Jackson Democrat." It was these two Senators' offices that housed the Leo Straussian "Children of Satan" behind the no-exit Iraq War.

From Jackson's staff came:

* Paul Wolfowitz, now Deputy Secretary of Defense and a leading
Straussian chicken-hawk;

* Richard Perle (on Jackson's staff from 1969 until going into
the Defense Department in 1981), and until his recent forced
resignation, chairman of Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board. It
is reported that Perle maintains Democratic Party membership
to this day, out of fealty to Scoop. Perle later brought along
Doug Feith, now Rumsfeld's Undersecretary for Policy, who has
been a Perle "groupie" since the late 1970s, largely due to
Feith's family background deep in the terrorist movement
founded by Zionist fascist Vladimir Jabotinsky. In the 1980s,
Feith financed Perle through the International Advisers Inc.,
a firm in which Feith was the only stockholder;

* Frank Gaffney, who heads the Center for Security Policy, a
"private" neo-con group which cheerleads for imperial wars and
brutally anti-Palestinian policies;

From Moynihan's office came:

* Elliott Abrams, an Iran/Contra convict who now tries to shape
Administration Middle East policy from the National Security
Council staff;

* Abram Shulsky, who heads the Office of Special Plans under
Feith in the Pentagon, which concocted fraudulent intelligence
estimates used by the Administration to justify the Iraq War;

* Gary Schmitt, the head of the empire-promoting Project for a
New American Century and a close collaborator of Shulsky.
Schmitt worked under Roy Godson of the National Strategy
Information Center in the early 1980s. Anti-LaRouche operative
Godson was active in the CDM in the 1970s, narrowly escaped
prosecution in the Iran-Contra scandals of the 1980s, and now
is a consultant to Feith and Shulsky's Office of Special
Plans.


http://www.leftgatekeepers.com/articles/MissingLinkHowRightWingNeoConsCreatedDemocraticLeadershipCouncilByMicheleSteinberg.htm






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Neocon 101
From Christian Science Monitor, a core class for your excellent course of study, LunaC...



EXCERPT...

What are the roots of neoconservative beliefs?

The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals who, in the 1960s and 70s, grew disenchanted with what they saw as the American left's social excesses and reluctance to spend adequately on defense. Many of these neocons worked in the 1970s for Democratic Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a staunch anti-communist. By the 1980s, most neocons had become Republicans, finding in President Ronald Reagan an avenue for their aggressive approach of confronting the Soviet Union with bold rhetoric and steep hikes in military spending. After the Soviet Union's fall, the neocons decried what they saw as American complacency. In the 1990s, they warned of the dangers of reducing both America's defense spending and its role in the world.

Unlike their predecessors, most younger neocons never experienced being left of center. They've always been "Reagan" Republicans.

CONTINUED...

http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html



Gee. What could be worse for America than an entire generation of young people raised on Reagan?

Another generation raised on Poppy Doc Bush.

Worse still is another generation raised on Baby Doc Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kick for knowledge...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Good post.
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. nominated
Edited on Sun Dec-25-05 06:25 PM by sweetheart
Yes, what is the truth?

on edit, well i guess i ain't nominating an old thread... but "imagine" a
+1 on the nomination. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-25-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. An important link
I hope everyone pays attention to Post #17 that describes how the PNAC and DLC share the same origin. This is important to keep in mind when considering the political landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It sure as hell is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC