Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AGENCIES TOLD TO STANDARDIZE "SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:38 PM
Original message
AGENCIES TOLD TO STANDARDIZE "SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED"
In an initiative with potentially significant implications for public
access to government information, the White House has told executive
branch agencies to develop standard procedures for handling of
"sensitive but unclassified" information.

"To promote and enhance the effective and efficient acquisition, access,
retention, production, use, management, and sharing of Sensitive But
Unclassified (SBU) information, including homeland security information,
law enforcement information, and terrorism information, procedures and
standards for designating, marking, and handling SBU information must be
standardized across the Federal Government," according to a December 16
White House memorandum.

...

As a result of the White House initiative, the category of "sensitive
but unclassified" is poised to become the government's largest single
information control category.

Yet there is no generally accepted definition of "sensitive."

...

The President's December 16 memorandum, "Guidelines and Requirements in
Support of the Information Sharing Environment," including Guideline 3
on Standard Procedures for SBU, is available here:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2005/12/wh121605-memo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Yet there is no generally accepted definition of "sensitive."= SECRET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. or anything they do not want seen by us outsiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. wonder if a new stamper with the word 'sensitive' is needed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why have definitions, rules, and laws. Dictators don't need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC