Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOTE TO REPORTERS: Do the math! Domestic Spying + ???? = Stolen Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:40 PM
Original message
NOTE TO REPORTERS: Do the math! Domestic Spying + ???? = Stolen Election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. History repeats itself. Think Watergate break-in.
That was about the election, not the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Of course it was.
And we know Rove has always done this; it is his one trick pony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fitzgeralds cell and office too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow! That would be so f-upped!!!
Geez. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. the possiblities are endless....
this is why we have the checks and balances, so we don't end up in a situation of plausible deniability

Bush can claim it was to protect and we can claim anything else and it can never be proven either way.

it is a sad sad day when America got a king.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Right. Because the rationalizations are endless, like...
...wasn't the Watergate break-in necessary to protect us from McGovern winning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. No Shit (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes
Seems getting the courts to approve a wiretap is as easy as feeding steak to your dog, why would they neglect to gain court approval? Illegal wiretapping can be most advantageous while campaigning, or listening in on anti-war patriots eh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. REPORTERS: Visit DU's Election reform forum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And you, too, can be the next Woodward. Make that, Bernstein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balbus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. What; does the ????? stand for?
Tinfoil hat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What does "tinfoil hat" stand for? Trying to undermine discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. Ding ding ding ding!!!
Tin foil hat = straying outside of the 'official story'

The official explanation for the mysterious results of 2004 is : "people hate faggots"

And any other explanation is tin foil hat.

Question everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Let's challenge the t-word when it's used to suppress discussion.
Tin foil is a slur. Code for crazy and paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. What I posted about the NYTs sealed it for me, any way.
They sat there and called us dissidents and internet conspiracy theorists and all the while, we were right. The only thing we didn't know was just how dirty our press was.

Man, that's a really sad thing to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Notice the "tinfoil" comment on this thread? I think...
...anytime we mention election fraud, there are people ready to make that idiotic tinfoil crack, and if it isn't a deliberate attempt to suppress the truth, it's about Dems who've sadly been influenced by the Luntz spin machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I can't notice what I can't see.
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 08:45 PM by sfexpat2000
:)

On edit: Last year we were fighting two huge forces. The strength of the conspirators, yes, conspirators that subverted our election AND the denial of a lot of people for whom even considering election fraud was too painful.

We did a lot this year. We've made huge inroads. This isn't going away anytime soon.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. People were embarrassed by the tinfoil slur.
It's an effective tool. Whenever anyone says "tinfoil", I think we should question their motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I agree. That slur made me back off more than once
as early as 11/3/2004.

I've come to understand that it's code for, "You're right and we're going to make you back down."

Especially when it is levelled against election reform activists -- with all we've had to handle this year -- check it out: being slandered in the press, being discounted BY OUR OWN PEOPLE who didn't bother to look, being locked out in Ohio after spending an arm and a leg making that recount happen, having our activists harrassed, even hounded.

And, *WE* have a problem? :shrug:

I don't think so.

If we were delusional, Ken Blackwell would have laughed and let OH be recounted. I notice, that didn't happen.

We were right, are still right, and every day, our peeps are getting it.

Beth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. LOL
I can't see that either!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. How does that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Go here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks. btw, why would someone "hide a thread"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. sometimes there are a lot of threads on one issue that may not interest
you. For example, when the Pope passed away, there were a lot of Pope threads that did not interest me. Hiding them got them off my list view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. k & r fer sure


Everyone should know how to put 2 and 2 together.

Leave no citizen behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Especially when 1 vote (for Kerry) = 0 vote
Is it denial... or innumeracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Voter Confidence Resolution
Whereas an election is a competition for the privilege of representing the people; and

Whereas each voter is entitled to cast a single ballot to record his or her preferences for representation; and

Whereas the records of individual votes are the basis for counting and potentially re-counting a collective total and declaring a winner; and

Whereas an election's outcome is a matter of public record, based on a finite collection of immutable smaller records; and

Whereas a properly functioning election system should produce unanimous agreement about the results indicated by a fixed set of unchanging records; and

Whereas recent U.S. federal elections have been conducted under conditions that have not produced unanimous agreement about the outcome; and

Whereas future U.S. federal elections cannot possibly produce unanimous agreement as long as any condition permits an inconclusive count or re-count of votes; and

Whereas inconclusive counts and re-counts have occurred during recent U.S. federal elections due in part to electronic voting devices that do not produce a paper record of votes to be re -counted if necessary; and

Whereas inconclusive results have also been caused by election machines losing data, producing negative vote totals, showing more votes than there are registered voters, and persistently and automatically swapping a voter's vote from his or her chosen candidate to an opponent; and

Whereas inconclusive results make it impossible to measure the will of the people in their preferences for representation; and

Whereas the Declaration of Independence refers to the Consent of the Governed as the self-evident truth from which Government derives "just Power";

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Because inconclusive results, by definition, mean that the true outcome of an election cannot be known, there is no basis for confidence in the results reported from U.S. federal elections; and

Be it also resolved:

The following is a comprehensive election reform platform likely to ensure conclusive election results and create a basis for confidence in U.S. federal elections:

1) voting processes owned and operated entirely in the public domain, and
2) clean money laws to keep all corporate funds out of campaign financing, and
3) a voter verified paper ballot for every vote cast and additional uniform standards determined by a non-partisan nationally recognized commission, and
4) declaring election day a national holiday, and
5) counting all votes publicly and locally in the presence of citizen witnesses and credentialed members of the media, and
6) equal time provisions to be restored by the media along with a measurable increase in local, public control of the airwaves, and
7) presidential debates containing a minimum of three candidates, run by a non-partisan commission comprised of representatives of publicly owned media outlets, and
8) preferential voting and proportional representation to replace the winner-take-all system for federal elections;

Be it further resolved:

When elections are conducted under conditions that prevent conclusive outcomes, the Consent of the Governed is not being sought. Absent this self-evident source of legitimacy, such Consent is not to be assumed or taken for granted.

http://guvwurld.blogspot.com/2005/04/voter-confidence-resolution.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC