Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the Republican House tried to hide.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:33 PM
Original message
What the Republican House tried to hide.
As many of you already know, the House of Representatives had a clandestine meeting late at night to pass the Defense Appropriations Bill for 2006. Bypassing the usual one-day requirement between releasing and voting on a bill, the Republicans enacted the little-used "marital law" provision that resulted in only 40 minutes of debate over the bill that gives the Defense department it's budget. See this issue expertly posted here by mcjoan.

What were they trying to hide? Concerned about the late-night "martial law" house passage of the Defense Appropriations bill, I examined the differences between the 2005 and 2006 bills. Curious as to why the Republican leadership would want to suppress debate about the bill, I searched for possible red flags.

(more)

<http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/20/182943/17>

This guy needs some input to his findings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it amazing how the most peace loving nation on the earth
spends the most (dozens of times over) the rest of the world on get this, defense. Let's call it what it is, it is offense, and it is used to shore up a flagging economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's a disgrace, Americans are in tents
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 08:50 PM by MissWaverly
and there they go on their predetermined flight plan of no contractor left behind. I smell
outsource! More drones, remote control toys from the air for Rummie's virtual war and
more mercenaries (excuse me I forgot to say contractors).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. shows how they "support the troops"
The numbers below expose the House slashing 16-30% of the funds devoted to paying our military personnel, depending on military branch. Funding to pay reserve personnel suffered a greater loss than active-duty personnel, with the Navy Reserve losing 30% compared to last year.

Listed below are the funds devoted to paying our military personnel in 2006 compared to 2005.

Branch Year 2005 Year 2006 Change %Change

Army $29,507,672,000 $24,357,895,000 (-)$5,149,777,000 (-)17.5%
Navy $24,416,157,000 $19,417,696,000 (-)$4,998,461,000 (-)20.5%
Marines $9,591,102,000 $7,839,813,000 (-)$1,751,289,000 (-)18.3%
Air Force $24,291,411,000 $20,083,037,000 (-)$4,208,374,000 (-)17.3%

Army Reserve $3,719,990,000 $2,862,103,000 (-)$857,887,000 (-)23.1%
Navy Reserve $2,108,232,000 $1,486,061,000 (-)$622,171,000 (-)29.5%
Marine Res. $653,073,000 $472,392,000 (-)$180,681,000 (-)27.7%
Air Force Res. $1,451,950,000 $1,225,360,000 (-)$226,590,000 (-)15.6%

Army Nat'l $5,915,229,000 $4,359,704,000 (-)1,555,525,000 (-)26.3%
Guard
Air Force $2,536,742,000 $2,028,215,000 (-)508,527,000 (-)20.0%
Nat'l Guard

WHY is the Republican-led House gutting our military personnel's pay? Do we have less personnel? Are they paid by some other avenue? Or, as I fear, is Congress simply slashing pay?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. HAH
And at the same time they are pushing through US70 billion in tax cut for the rich.
In the same bill that is cutting US40 million from the poor
And borrowing another 700 billion from other countries.

Gee 70 billion in tax cut for the rich while screwing the army with a war on.
How sick do the US need to be before they wake up to reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. What the hell? That can't be right, can it??n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is no more money...
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 09:10 PM by C_U_L8R
Bush plundered the treasury.

Next year they can declare bankruptcy and auction off
what's left of the government to their corporate pals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC