Freepers ABSOLUTELY ENRAGED about FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION

I dont think they get it

Its not the damn name were mad about its the corruption of the fourth and our privacy

I wonder if they know what the CONSTITUTION is ?

To: sendtoscott
Thanks for this post. I have been chilled at the speech that Ashcorft gives over and over in order to grab new power. Let us win the war and solve the true problem and leave liberty intact. Also, that new cabinet post sounds dangerously close to a national police force.
4 posted on 09/21/2001 8:47:29 AM PDT by major-pelham

To: tex-oma
Someone explain to me what is 'patriotic' about wanting to diminish America's freedoms. Patriotic or demagogic?
9 posted on 09/21/2001 9:08:16 AM PDT by al-andalus

To: al-andalus
Someone explain to me what is 'patriotic' about wanting to diminish America's freedoms. Patriotic or demagogic?

Careful, if you question the amazing expansion of the state of this past week you might get labeled a "terrorist." When I question this particular trojan horse that is what I am called.

22 posted on 09/21/2001 9:34:15 AM PDT by Zviadist
To: Sandy
Imagine if this attack had happened a year ago. Can't you just see everyone here rallying around President Clinton and cheering to push this exact same "reasonable" legislation through? Nooo? Funny...me neither.

Anyone here want President Hillary to have these powers?
50 posted on 09/21/2001 11:15:33 AM PDT by sendtoscott

To: Neil E. Wright
This is insane...
3 posted on 03/14/2004 2:49:42 PM PST by Rams82

To: Neil E. Wright
"A far-reaching FBI proposal would require all broadband Net providers, including cable modem and DSL companies, to rewire their networks to support easy wiretapping by police."
At whose expense?

Amendment V

"...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."

This action, regulation, or law is blatantly unconstitutional.

If we U.S. citzens wish to have this type of access for wiretapping broadband data conveyance, then we citizens have to compensate the private property owners for that cost for public use.

7 posted on 03/14/2004 3:09:08 PM PST by tahiti

To: templar
If you have nothing to hide from President Hillary, you have nothing to fear.
9 posted on 03/14/2004 5:10:46 PM PST by Tangerine Time Machine (Orange you glad it's not a lemon?)

To: Neil E. Wright


CAN YOU SAY POLICE STATE!!!
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!

13 posted on 03/14/2004 8:24:31 PM PST by Patriot1998

To: Patriot1998
Bad Bad Bad

This is all very bad...

14 posted on 03/14/2004 8:40:11 PM PST by Cheetah1

To: Neil E. Wright
Ever since the "anthrax" scare at the U.S. Supremes, there has been a judicial blank check for anything couched as "homeland security." Congress will pass unconstitutional laws, the president will sign the laws doubting the constitutionality, and 5 clymers in black robes will declare the laws to be constitutional. The inmates are running the asylum. Could be worse. Could be living in Spain and surrendering to terrorists at the ballot box.
15 posted on 03/14/2004 8:42:50 PM PST by Young Rhino (http://www.artofdivorce.com)