XM ad for AirAmerica Radio: "More lies and distortion..."

"...but this time, it's OUR lies and distortion."

So, what they're insinuating is that AAR is full of liars and distortions.

Sorry, but this has been a small bug up my ass since I first heard it about a month ago...:grr:

Also, when is XM going to play Mike Malloy's full show on his normal time slot?

that is just wrong on so many levels

in January...so I hope Malloy will get his correct time slot on XM!

Mike has been great filling in for Randi Rhodes this week.

All should call XM and write XM to get rid of that fucked up promo ad!!!!

XM is going to have TWO conservative talk channels, versus ONE liberal/progressive?
:wtf:

but you need to let them know you want it... Schultz dosen't 'Fit' on the ASK! channel...

A second channel? And Sirius is still fucking up their first channel?!?

Geez, keep that up and I may have to finally break down.

If I'm going to do it, it's going to be all the way.

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-BvOmzCFT3ZU/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=168550&I=500IVAD310

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-BvOmzCFT3ZU/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?i=700XMALPIN

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-BvOmzCFT3ZU/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?i=607SIRALP1

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-BvOmzCFT3ZU/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?i=500KCA420I

http://www.crutchfield.com/S-BvOmzCFT3ZU/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=400&I=065S85

Can you tell I've been thinking about this? ;)

Now, if you'll excuse, there's a fat guy in a red suit I gotta mug.

.. there's a POLK XRt12 Reference Receiver in there for about 1/2 price.

All the Crutchfield links were for a sweet Alpine system. At home, I have a Sirius deck (similar to the Polk, but no video or coaxial, just optical) and a Soundbridge which gives me what I need there.

Via internet:
http://www.xmradio.com/contact_us/contact_us.jsp


Via telephone:
1-800-XM-RADIO (1-800-967-2346) during the following hours:

Mon - Sat: 6AM - 2 AM ET
Sun: 8 AM - 8 PM ET

The text of my email:
To whom it may concern;

Your advertisements for AirAmerica Radio state that AAR is "more lies and distortion." Do you advertise your America Right and Fox News channels in the same way?

I humbly ask that you cease this strange and transparent attack ad about AAR. I switched to XM from Sirius SPECIFICALLY for AAR. I can easliy podcast AAR programming if you fail to correct this.

Thank you.

And I believe I do. It's the RW that engages in "lies and distortions." It's the only way that they can manage to keep their believers in line. But we have the truth on our side. I prefer hearing the truth, though it's often far from pleasant, especially now...:shrug:

In light of this, as well as the claim that AAR is place to "Get your daily marching orders"...

http://www.xmradio.com/programming/channel_page.jsp?ch=167

...in addition to XM's failure to promote AAR as a valued exclusive...

http://www.xmradio.com/learn/programming.jsp

...it is obvious that XM doesn't value AAR and AAR's listeners.

You mean like the voice-overs from the AAR staff saying "ONLY on XM"??

No, really.

I had a feeling I'd be seeing you post. And I was itching for a little pro-XM-AAR-deal/anti-XM-AAR-deal jousting ;)

You mean the voiceovers that I don't hear on the AAR internet stream? You mean the voiceovers that I doubt (although please tell me if I'm wrong) are heard on the AAR terrestrial radio stations? You mean the voiceovers that are only heard on XM's AAR station?

No, I don't mean the voiceovers that are only heard by people already sold on the product AND program. I mean items like the ones I posted...

http://www.xmradio.com/programming/channel_page.jsp?ch=167

http://www.xmradio.com/learn/programming.jsp

The key word: "PROMOTE". As in promote to people who might buy the product to get quality liberal talk programming, not promote to the very small population of XM-AAR listeners who have already been sold on the product.

XM should be proud of their AAR deal. They should want to shout it from the proverbial rooftops. And yet, I, as a non-XM subscriber, don't see it. I don't see it on their web site. I don't see Al hanging with Ellen, Derek, and Snoop on the TV ads. Yes, I know there was an obscure little press release that almost nobody saw when all this XM-AAR shit went down. But really, what has XM done to promote their exclusivity with AAR? Hell, how hard would it have been to buy ad space on DU and other progressive web sites where it would have been beneficial on more than one level?

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe there is a place in XM's advertising that actively promotes the AAR deal to people considering buying the product. Maybe I just haven't seen it. But I know you're involved with all of XM's movements, so if you know of a place where XM promotes AAR to people who might buy XM, please tell me.

(And while you're at it, feel free to tell us about the latest, greatest deal to buy XM. No, seriously. I've seen your posts and I know some folks around here, who don't feel burned, really do appreciate it. And with Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Festivus, National Falafel Day, et cetera coming up, I'm sure there are a few last minute shoppers here who would like to help a real liberal in need, or a person who needs to hear a real liberal. Plus, since XM's ads don't do it, someone should. You're really the main man, the only man that I've seen, to promote XM to this very important demographic.)

Finally, and most importantly, happy holidays, Rosco.

No, really.

"You mean the voiceovers that I don't hear on the AAR internet stream? You mean the voiceovers that I doubt (although please tell me if I'm wrong) are heard on the AAR terrestrial radio stations? You mean the voiceovers that are only heard on XM's AAR station?"

Well, since this thread is about the XM broadcast, why should stream or OTR broadcasts be an issue??? Stick with the point man :)

"feel free to tell us about the latest, greatest deal to buy XM. No, seriously. I've seen your posts and I know some folks around here, who don't feel burned, really do appreciate it."

I did a coupla of days ago...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5640995&mesg_id=5640995

the RoadyXT for FREE or the Sportspack XMtoGo for $49 is pretty smoking...

"so if you know of a place where XM promotes AAR to people who might buy XM, please tell me"

how about the AAR website???

Now that reply disappointed me.

Because this subthread, which you replied to, started with the issue of what XM does to "promote". In any event, it all still deals with the issue of respect for AAR by XM.

C'mon, Rosco. Don't let me down. ;)



:7

Oh, that is too funny!

Nice to know there are things in life we can count on. The sky is blue, Two plus two is four, and Rosco has a new XM deal.

You really should be paid by XM.



Oh, good! XM managed to do the bare minimum, something that is better than nothing. I'd imagine that's a freebie ad that was part of the XM-AAR deal? Maybe. Maybe not. In any event, thank you for that. Any more?

Of course, that brings to mind what I think is a significant tangent (Warning: tangent approaching. Some folks may want to get off this ride now.). I decided to look elsewhere for similar XM promotion for other broadcasts. And so, I decided to go....HERE! (WARNING! DANGER WILL ROBINSON! EVIL LINKS AHEAD!!!)

http://www.foxnews.com/

http://www.foxnews.com/access/radio.html

http://shop.ecompanystore.com/foxnews/FOX_shop.asp

Man, I need a shower, and a virus scan!

Anyway, I didn't find a XM ad there. Surely, after the brand new XM-Fox News deal, there would be a MUTUAL interest in getting XM ads readily seen on the Fox web site? Wouldn't there?

...Or...

Maybe Fox needs to get people instead to other outlets, where ratings translates into advertising dollars?

The point? Of course, XM should try to promote AAR on AAR's web site as it is in XM's interest. That's the bare minimum. But if AAR gets a flat, non-ratings-based fee from XM, this may not be in AAR's long term interest. AAR should be more aggressively promoting outlets that would drive up ratings and thus ad dollars, not just a banner that links to a page that pushes XM at the top of it. Perhaps a pop-up on mouse rollover of that banner that gives a state-by-state listing would be better, with links to the stations as well. Of course, this would require more management skills that are not currently present at AAR.

Yep, definately a tangent. Sorry. (At least it proves I don't get stuck in a rut in dinner party conversations ;) )

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

that deal was put forth by AIR AMERICA as part of their advertising partners deal.

with regard to your last post to me in the subthread that got nuked.

well, that explains everything, yet very few would understand.

I'd talk more, but I gotta work. I'll give a proper PM later.
Thanks.

hopelessly meaningless interview with someone about the maze of various Iraqi political parties, burning up enough time to avoid the impeachment issue.

.. so it's nothing new.

They also have one that says "The Most Important Talk In The Country".

I can't believe that AAR isn't apoplectic about that @#$%& ad!

before you go off on a rant.

Personally, I see the humor in it, turning around the charges of 'lies and distortion' that the Reich-wing throws at the left..

but then, I have a sense of humor...

..."lies and distortions."

In this particular case, a rant is warranted.:eyes:

As far as asking AAR, the ads are being generated FROM XM, not AAR.

AAR or at least be approved by AAR? Your gripe might actually be with AAR.

Happy Holidays to you and yours.

..in any way they see fit (although I don't know that to be a fact). Admittedly, I'm a bit surprised that AAR isn't angry about it - the statement insinuates that AAR and its hosts are liars and distorters.

And a very Happy Holidays to you, too! :hi:

it is still WRONG. I don't care if it is 'nothing new' - it is WRONG. AAR rightly prides itself on fact-checking and being accurate - Limbaugh and co pride themselves on getting away with lying.

It is WRONG. :grr:

.. if it was so 'wrong', why hasn't AAR told XM to pull it???

Your beef is with AAR I would think...

which I *highly* doubt. AAR got a good deal from XM in terms of increasing size of audience and getting good studio space. AAR is still the little kid on the talk radio block that everyone can shove around. Just because you can beat up the kid next door and humiliate him/her in front of everybody does *not* mean that you should do so.

I have no beef with XM - no opinions about them whatsoever - other than: this 'ad' they have created for AAR is disgusting. My hunch is that you do understand this situation. No entity can be all 'right' and they are wrong on this.

I started my XM subscription the DAY BEFORE AAR premiered on XM (in exclusivity). I NEVER heard that ad until a month ago. Never - not once.

Prove to me that the ad's been on AAR's XM feed "from day 1." Better yet, if ANYONE who listens to AAR on XM can confirm Rosco's claim, please do so and I will publicly apologize to Rosco. Until then, Rosco, your corporate shill is showing...:eyes:

so I tell you to take your bullshit and stuff it in your ass... It's been there since the day AAR started and I personally don't give a fricking rat's ass if you believe it or not....

go straight to hell with your apology...

Prove it, or STFU. :):rofl:

I don't have to prove a damn thing... and gee, you notice someone else above made the comment about your original post "I've wondered about that for a LONG TIME".

I don't have to prove a damn thing to you or anyone else... I've never made a dime off XM and unless YOUR can prove otherwise YOU STFUAH.

As far as your claim:
-I've never made a dime off XM-

That makes your exuberance for XM really freaking creepy! :rofl:

By the way, it's fun watching you become unglued about something you have no financial stake in... :spray:

Oh, and "a long time" could be a week, or a month.:eyes:

P.S. thank you for kicking my thread repeatedly!:thumbsup:

... you're being a little troll and snarking on this..

You bother to contact AAR to ask about it? No.
You bother to contact XM and ask about it? No.
If you have, you waited till you got an answer about it? No.

When you got something to backup your PERSONAL ATTTACKS ON ME, bring it out..

thill then... FOAD.

You bother to contact AAR to ask about it? Yes.
You bother to contact XM and ask about it? Why, yes again!

Waited for an answer? No - why should I? Surely, I'm not the first to notice this, and the ad still plays.

As far as personal attacks go, you have three posts in this thread that could be pulled for "personal attacks" (including the post I'm replying to right now). I haven't alerted, because I want all of DU to see your behavior.

:hi:

"ranting" and "shallow name-calling". AAR, with some exceptions, is a lot like right-wing radio in that it also avoids much in-depth discussion of issues, or resorts to mind-numbing repetition of mantra. It isn't a surprise that once we got a talk network that it would emulate right-wing methodology, its just a disappointment.

In North Texas, we don't have an outlet for Pacifica, although I do listen to it on the Internet. I also have Sirius, which although losing AAR, does have news sources that I do appreciate, including BBC, CBC, NPR, PRI and World Radio Network. I guess, I'm not scared to listening to a fairly balanced broadcast (I'm not implying others are). I am just not a fan of rah-rah talk radio coming from either side.

Thanks for responding.

I have to confess that, when I listen to radio, I am normally only half-listening or half-asleep, so NPR and Pacifica can be rough for me. The inanity and repetition of AAR (and even RW radio) work better for me because of that.

I am lucky to have a local Pacifica outlet, though. Just need to use it.

from the time I started listening to AAR about a year and a half ago. I always assumed it was meant to be a humorous, pre-emptive strike at those on the right, who were doubtless poised to launch that exact accusation at AAR. Sort of in the same spirit of March Maron reading that daily liberal marching orders faxed in from "the Streisand compound."

Perhaps next time I'll know enough to take it seriously and get all huffy.

...but that's XM's ad, so that's why I got all "huffy." :eyes:

it's on XM's BROADCAST, do you DEFINATIVELY KNOW IT WAS ONLY XM'S AD?

I don't, neither do you, till then, it's conjecture.

...I have no idea what you're talking about.:shrug::crazy:

was it written by XM and APPROVED by AAR or
was it written by AAR??

devil is in the details.

...the same DG that let Maron go. However, if I worked at AAR the LAST thing I would want is to have insinuations placed on AAR in regards to its credibilty. Joke, or no joke.

See when you're polite, you get a polite answer, Rosco. :D

since people have TOLD YOU they heard it a year and a half ago (hmmm... yeah and a half, 22-24 months... why.. that's how long AAR had been on the air) it existed WELL BEFORE GOLDBERG CAME ALONG..

thanks for playing, try again..

That's not "people," that's "person."

Try again, XM boy! :rofl:

"Better yet, if ANYONE who listens to AAR on XM can confirm Rosco's claim, please do so and I will publicly apologize to Rosco"

Me+someone else = two = plural = people

Changing the rules again? How Republican of you :D

You said "people," and there's only one person who said you were correct. I kept to my word and apologized. However, your statement - since people have TOLD YOU they heard it a year and a half ago - is incorrect, as there's been only one person who agreed with you.

Sorry, you're just plain wrong. :D

The Advertising 101 axiom: Say Good, Say Bad, Just Say. For most some it may be offensive, for others it may be cute and for a certain number it will sell.

The fact there's a reaction to this ad has done what it was intended to do. I don't listen to XM, thus I've never heard this commercial. Now I'm aware of it...and curious to hear what it sounds like so I can determine if it's as offensive as others claim. Again, the design of the ad...to get ears to listen is accomplish. (Actually, I'm not gonna listen, cause I don't care about XM or in subscribing...just having some fun here).

I've seen AAR stations that like to tweak wingnuts on their billboards and promotional advertising...one I saw in LA said "For people who can stand the truth". I found that great...but I could imagine a wingnut fuming if he saw that thing. 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other.

AAR is an opinion and personality network. It works hard to be as accurate and factual as possible, but the bottom line is the shows are red meat for us who have little else on the radio dial to listen to. Can AAR present opinions that appear to be "lies or distortions"...sure...it depends on the ears that listen. Viva La Difference. Aren't we fighting for diversity of opinion...even the wingnuts? We just don't want them to have any real power...just their little soap boxes to brood in.

Merry Holidays...

you're making too much sense... you'll be attacked any moment now..

thinks this ad is of recent vintage, is because it did seem to disappear for awhile. I noticed it's reappearance a couple of weeks ago. Brought back memories of summer before last, when I started listening to Liz and Rachel in the morning on my way in to work. The "now it's OUR lies and distortion" bit was a daily bumper between segments on their show.

...I heard it.

:D

:rofl:

Us crumundgeons live a lonely existance out here...

:hi:

:hi:

Thanks!

What's the point? I get enough RW bias from CNN! The only time I listen to Rush is when Al Franken dissects his diatribe and points out the lies he's spewing. As for Hannity, I hear him when "The Daily Show" has his lies and distortions read by children... Anyway, it's great to have you with us!:hi:

Sirius used to run ads for Hannity's radio show on another Sirius channel.

I always wondered what the hell Sirius was thinking. Did they actually think lots of AAR listeners would want to tune into Hannity?

...talk about wasting ad space!

It's not often, but when it does, I think why don't they run ads for a KKK channel as well. Makes as much sense.

If this is true it should be yanked immediately.