Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Democratic lawmakers BELIEVE there is voting machine fraud?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:31 PM
Original message
What Democratic lawmakers BELIEVE there is voting machine fraud?
It seems to me that needs to be established before we can get much further on this issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Conyers and possibly Maxine Waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you mean
believe it is possible to hack the machines or believe they have the evidence to prove the machines were hacked? (These could be the same thing or could be different things.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Believe the machines can be and possibly were hacked in the past.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hasn't the evidence moved past 'belief' and into 'knowledge'? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Beyond knowledge and into "deal cutting", imo
Gotta let a few "win" so it looks kosher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well, there are guys like Dodd and Richardson who don't believe it at all.
And I am wondering who exactly IS on record for even believing it's possible, at least, if they don't believe it happened already.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Most probably "know" it, but are not interested in opening up
that can of worms.. Worst case scenario for THEM?? They lose their seat in congress and can then move on to a multi-million dollar job as a lobbyist or board of director's gig.. The only personal losses are those of the ordinary folks like us, who have little or no say in much of anything:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. You'd think they'd understand by now that democracy, itself, is at risk.
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 02:13 PM by blm
I personally think that not many believe it and they are beating down those who do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rush Holt and everyone who signed his resolution?
Why else would they want a paper trail/receit/audit? Conyers, for sure. The CBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunshinekathy Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. To Restore democracy, candidates must stop conceding
There is no way to stop the tampering of elections today, unless candidates stop conceding and demand to obtain and analyze their own detailed election results data and, if it looks suspicious, fight for hand recounts or even re-elections where necessary.

A group of professionals, mostly PhDs, at US Count Votes wrote this concise "History of the Debate Surrounding the 2004 Presidential Election" to help politicians and the public understand elections in America today. The Washington State governor's race and other information in our history show that election tampering is not restricted to presidential races.

Please make copies to give to politicians you know:

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Presidential-Election-2004.pdf

US Count Votes has authored basic common sense methods to ensure that vote counts accurately reflect voter intent (because there never will be a perfectly tamper-proof voting system):

1. Election data analyzation. (I'm amazed that any candidate would concede without first analyzing their election data, but Gore, Kerry, and the DNC did - even in Ohio. Even though they have every legal right to the data - they didn't even bother to obtain it!)

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/election_officials/ElectionArchive_advice.pdf

2. Independent Audits of Vote Counts. We audit banks, churches, and businesses to detect errors and prevent insider embezzlement. Vote count winners control budgets and issues worth millions to trillion, yet we "trust" the insiders not to tamper or make errors! (Due to many years of vote count manipulation and the new DRE voting machines that are trivial to use to manipulate vote counts without leaving a trace, it may not be possible to implement independent audits until after doing election data analysis to put honestly elected candidates into office for a few election cycles):

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/Paper_Audits.pdf

Unless we can educate politicians to stop conceding until after investigating the accuracy of their own vote counts, we will not live in a democracy and millions of lives will be lost, just like when Hitler got rid of the German Republic.

Educating politicians to stop conceding elections is vital to restoring democracy and may be the most difficult task due to the arrogance of some politicians who cause their own demise by implementing measures like the Help America Vote Act law which was the largest bonanza for election tamperers in the history of America.

Please pass out this scientific academic history:

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Presidential-Election-2004.pdf




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Amen!.. they make out their supporters to be dopes!
The days before the elections, they come to us begging for more money, and keep promising how they will FIGHT for us, and then a day later, they brush their hands together, and hug the bastard who cheated them out of an election, and tell us how we need to "move forward".. BULLSHIT.

Pols are so afraid of being labeled a "sore loser", yet you are only a loser if you give in willingly. People admire leaders who take a stand, and at least demand an accounting.

The same people (who lose) seem to always be running, and keep asking people for more money. They don;t use the money they were given, to account for the election they just had...they "hoard it" for the NEXT election, which in all likelihood, they will again be cheated out of..

and they wonder why the public is apathetic and disconnected....like our "leader" said.."fool me..can't get fooled again"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The machines need securing BEFORE the election - after is too late.
The machines are setup for onetime use and then they automatically erase.

The DNC needs to secure the machines and verify their programs BEFORE elections because after is too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The rigged machines are set up for onetime use so there's NO EVIDENCE.
The machines need securing BEFORE the election.

After is too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Max Cleland came up short in 2002 after having a lead in the polls
over Saxby Chambliss. 23,000 Diebold voting machines were installed throughout the state of Georgia before that election.

Cleland most likely believes the election was stolen but he has to be confronted with the question in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. and if he were confronted in public, he would be a "gentleman"
and back away from the issue, because there is no PROOF..

Voting is not rocket science, and COULD be made transparent and easy, but it only gets more complicated ..why??..because the MORE layers, the easier it is to fudge the numbers..

Dems are probably reluctant to "fix it" because they still see themselves as pozssibly getting back in the leadership, and they probably want to utilize the same weaknesses to their advantage someday.. The sad truth?..It's probably too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Dems don't want to be painted conspiracy theorists or "Sore Losermen".
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. How do you know that Mr. Cleland 'most likely believes'
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 03:21 PM by Freddie Stubbs
that the election was stolen? What has he said or done to cause you to draw that conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Because he was the victim of an obvious stolen election. He's a
national figure so it would be "irresponsible" for him to claim election fraud with no proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. What makes you think that he actually believes this?
:shurg:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I never said "actually believes". Take a look at your original question.
If you don't think he could or should believe there was fraud I'm okay with that.

It would be hard for a person involved in a close election to ignore so much of the data that points to a Diebold theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I think he believes it -privately for now -
I think when Teresa spoke up about it a while back that she was saying what many in the Kerry camp believe happened, including Cleland.

I think they just won't speak out publicly until they find the most effective way to do it, and I think that means having some Sec of State in office that believe in machine fraud, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC