|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:38 PM Original message |
The FISA Judge who quit learned of it through news reports! Dammit all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:39 PM Original message |
I wish he hadn't quit - we need people of integrity more than ever now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 11:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. The post suggest that he was "retired" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't see why expanded, unchecked executive powers are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It's smart ass law school profs vs. protection for the gullable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. He didn't know he was fronting for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. Please, pretty please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. with sugar on top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. meaning he didn't really quit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, of course. The purpose is to avoid the court, not inform it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-21-05 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. Is this judge going to make a public statement sometime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostexpectation (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-22-05 10:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. they asked, were refused and did it anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nanbrown (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-22-05 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
11. link please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC