Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

". . . when Americans wake up on January 1, we will not be as safe."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:43 PM
Original message
". . . when Americans wake up on January 1, we will not be as safe."
Transcript of Attorney General Gonzales, DHS Sec. Chertoff Press Briefing on Need for Senate to Reauthorize USA PATRIOT Act
12/21/2005

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=58545

Attorney General Gonzales:

"There are critics, some critics of the Patriot Act who say this is about civil liberties. They present a false choice to the American people. This is not a choice between civil liberties and the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act includes many protections for liberties, and that's why the Department of Justice has been outstanding these past four years. The conference bill includes 30 additional safeguards of civil liberties. If you look at what some people consider the most controversial provisions, section 215, business records provision, and national security letters, under the conference bill it is now clear that you can consult an attorney when you receive one of these orders, or letters. It is now clear that you can challenge these in court. It is now clear the Department of Justice has to make a public disclosure of the use of these authorities. It is now clear that the Inspector General of the Department of Justice is going to be auditing the way that these authorities are used. But this is not enough for some of the critics.

Their fear of abuse is so great that they want to impose additional burdens on these authorities. Burdens that are so great that it will in essence make them meaningless, useless, for the law enforcement community, even though these tools have been effective, and even though these tools have been used in a way that is protective of civil liberties. If the impasse continues, when Americans wake up on January 1, we will not be as safe. This may not be evident those first few weeks, or even the first few months, but we will not be as safe because we are facing an enemy, as the President reminded us this morning, that's very patient, and very diabolical. And so that is what is at stake in the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, and that is why the Senate needs to act to reauthorize the Patriot Act and vote on the conference bill. As the President said, the house has left town. We do not have the opportunity for an extension. The options are to either let the Patriot Act expire or to vote to allow the reauthorization of these provisions."



Gonzales just spent two days telling all who would listen that the congressional authorization for war gave the president the authority to bypass the laws with respect to detention and wiretaps. In effect, the president would have the authority to bypass any law that hindered him from fighting his 'war on terror'.

The obvious result of that reasoning is that the terror war would go on indefinitely, without end, leaving the authority to ignore legislation passed by Congress in the hands of future presidents for centuries to come, so long as they declared that the terror war continued. By that reasoning, since the president delegates everything, all of his surrogates, operatives, agencies, and agents would be free to ignore the law while claiming to be in pursuit of the 'enemy'.

This entire Patriot Act fear campaign by the White House is nothing more than an attempt to deflect from the criminal sidestepping of the FISA court, and a ploy to foist responsibility for Bush's failed terror war onto Democrats. If we do get attacked, the first thing out of the White House would be a mealy-mouthed excuse about tied hands. But, in the face of their indifference to congressional restrictions and established constitutional principles and law, it should seem incredulous that anything Congress did stopped them from doing what they wanted to anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did anyone hear Chertoff when he said, 'I lie awake in bed
some nights and worry about when the next attack will occur', to paraphrase it?

These morons have to know that none of us buy this nonsense anymore.

And, I am loving all of the callers on CSPAN who mention the fact that illegals continue to pour over our borders. How much longer can * co. cont to think that the sheeples feel safer??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It could be worse. Chertoff could be an agnostic insomniac with dyslexia
Edited on Wed Dec-21-05 05:52 PM by ticapnews
and lie awake at night wondering if there is a dog.

It does say something about how safe we are NOW with the Patriot Act in place if the DHS Secretary lies awake at night worrying. If we aren't safe with it, how less safe will we really be without it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think he was talking about New Orleans, Katrina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have their unlimited power and STILL prospectively blaming dems
for the inevitable terror attack.

Shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Admin Keeping the Fear Vigil going...that's all they do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. fanning the flames of fear that first flashed from the WTC
jingoistic appeals to patriotism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC