Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Appeals panel says Bush played them to keep Padilla in custody

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:45 AM
Original message
Appeals panel says Bush played them to keep Padilla in custody
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 09:47 AM by bigtree
Court rejects Bush request

In what amounts to a sharp rebuke of the Bush administration, a U.S. appeals court has rejected a request to transfer Jose Padilla, the accused terrorist who has been held for three years as an "enemy combatant," from military custody to face charges in a civilian court, the International Herald Tribune reported from Washington.

Last month, the panel issued a brief order suggesting it might withdraw an earlier opinion that gave Bush sweeping powers to detain Padilla, an American, indefinitely without trial. But the administration then shifted course and said it would no longer hold Padilla as an enemy combatant but try him on criminal charges in a civilian court.

On Wednesday, the appeals panel said that the Justice Department's effort to transfer Padilla gave the appearance that the government was trying to manipulate the court system to prevent the Supreme Court from reviewing the case.

The original allegation that Padilla was part of a bomb plot was not mentioned in a Justice Department indictment on Nov. 22, which said only that Padilla was part of a terror cell that supported violent acts overseas.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/12/22/news/policy.php

slick, slick, slick. What kind of free nation holds one of its citizens indefinitely without trial? What type of free nation manipulates its own courts tyring to hold one of ita citizens indefinitely without trial, satisfied, from their self-appointed perch as judge, jury, and executioner, that their verdict is correct and incorruptable? sick, sick, sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. What was the words he use for Delay
Innocent until proven guilty... or something like this.
Oh well different standard apply I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It just amazes me that Bush, not the police, not the military, Bush . . .
. . . can hold this fellow indefinitely without charges. How are we to believe that he's a threat just from this unbelievable government's accusations? They are the proven liars. Padilla deserves the presumption of innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why Does the Court...
...hate America?

We don't need no stinking habeus corpus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Freedom of religion, freedom of the press,
and freedom of person under the protection of habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation.
-Thomas Jefferson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why does Thomas Jefferson...
...hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. the kind of administration that only wants to win win win
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 12:06 PM by librechik
no matter who they have to step on or what laws they have to break to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC